Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/2] i965: Make intel_emit_linear_blit handle Gen8+ alignment restrictions.

[Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>]

Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:38:44PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:13:31PM -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
>> > The BLT engine on Gen8+ requires linear surfaces to be cacheline
>> > aligned.  This restriction was added as part of converting the BLT to
>> > use 48-bit addressing.
>> > 
>> > intel_emit_linear_blit needs to handle blits that are not cacheline
>> > aligned, as we use it for arbitrary glBufferSubData calls and subrange
>> > mappings.
>> > 
>> > Since intel_emit_linear_blit uses 1 byte per pixel, we can use the src/dst
>> > pixel X offset field to represent the unaligned portion, and subtract
>> > that from the address so it's cacheline aligned.
>> > 
>> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88521
>> > Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
>> > Cc: mesa-stable@lists.freedesktop.org
>> 
>> s/cacheline/page/ afaik, and nope it's not documented. Chris&Mika learned
>> that the hard way. Adding them to correct me in case I make a mess again.
>
> It's cacheline.
>
> Issue: if the 1st pixel in XY_SRC_COPY  is not CL aligned when SRC or
> DST are linear that will cause failure.
>
> https://vthsd.fm.intel.com/hsd/bdwgfx/bug_de/default.aspx?bug_de_id=1912704
> -Chris
>

FWIF, I ended up doing it like this in igt:

http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-January/059191.html

And I think the documentation was updated on the restrictions.

-Mika
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx