All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ian Munsie <imunsie@au1.ibm.com>, mpe <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: cbe-oss-dev <cbe-oss-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	mikey <mikey@neuling.org>, arnd <arnd@arndb.de>,
	greg <greg@kroah.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>, anton <anton@samba.org>,
	imunsie <imunsie@au1.ibm.com>, jk <jk@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] powerpc/copro: Use appropriate ESID mask in copro_calculate_slb
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 13:43:28 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877fzky5lj.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1414466730-15591-4-git-send-email-imunsie@au.ibm.com>

Ian Munsie <imunsie@au1.ibm.com> writes:

> From: Ian Munsie <imunsie@au1.ibm.com>
>
> This patch makes copro_calculate_slb mask the ESID by the correct mask
> for 1T vs 256M segments.
>
> This has no effect by itself as the extra bits were ignored, but it
> makes debugging the segment table entries easier and means that we can
> directly compare the ESID values for duplicates without needing to worry
> about masking in the comparison.
>
> This will be used to simplify a comparison in the following patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Munsie <imunsie@au1.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

> ---
>  arch/powerpc/mm/copro_fault.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/copro_fault.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/copro_fault.c
> index 0f9939e..5a236f0 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/copro_fault.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/copro_fault.c
> @@ -99,8 +99,6 @@ int copro_calculate_slb(struct mm_struct *mm, u64 ea, struct copro_slb *slb)
>  	u64 vsid;
>  	int psize, ssize;
>  
> -	slb->esid = (ea & ESID_MASK) | SLB_ESID_V;
> -
>  	switch (REGION_ID(ea)) {
>  	case USER_REGION_ID:
>  		pr_devel("%s: 0x%llx -- USER_REGION_ID\n", __func__, ea);
> @@ -133,6 +131,7 @@ int copro_calculate_slb(struct mm_struct *mm, u64 ea, struct copro_slb *slb)
>  	vsid |= mmu_psize_defs[psize].sllp |
>  		((ssize == MMU_SEGSIZE_1T) ? SLB_VSID_B_1T : 0);
>  
> +	slb->esid = (ea & (ssize == MMU_SEGSIZE_1T ? ESID_MASK_1T : ESID_MASK)) | SLB_ESID_V;
>  	slb->vsid = vsid;
>  
>  	return 0;
> -- 
> 2.1.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ian Munsie <imunsie@au1.ibm.com>, mpe <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: greg <greg@kroah.com>, arnd <arnd@arndb.de>,
	benh <benh@kernel.crashing.org>, mikey <mikey@neuling.org>,
	anton <anton@samba.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>, jk <jk@ozlabs.org>,
	imunsie <imunsie@au1.ibm.com>,
	cbe-oss-dev <cbe-oss-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] powerpc/copro: Use appropriate ESID mask in copro_calculate_slb
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 13:43:28 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877fzky5lj.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1414466730-15591-4-git-send-email-imunsie@au.ibm.com>

Ian Munsie <imunsie@au1.ibm.com> writes:

> From: Ian Munsie <imunsie@au1.ibm.com>
>
> This patch makes copro_calculate_slb mask the ESID by the correct mask
> for 1T vs 256M segments.
>
> This has no effect by itself as the extra bits were ignored, but it
> makes debugging the segment table entries easier and means that we can
> directly compare the ESID values for duplicates without needing to worry
> about masking in the comparison.
>
> This will be used to simplify a comparison in the following patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Munsie <imunsie@au1.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

> ---
>  arch/powerpc/mm/copro_fault.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/copro_fault.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/copro_fault.c
> index 0f9939e..5a236f0 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/copro_fault.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/copro_fault.c
> @@ -99,8 +99,6 @@ int copro_calculate_slb(struct mm_struct *mm, u64 ea, struct copro_slb *slb)
>  	u64 vsid;
>  	int psize, ssize;
>  
> -	slb->esid = (ea & ESID_MASK) | SLB_ESID_V;
> -
>  	switch (REGION_ID(ea)) {
>  	case USER_REGION_ID:
>  		pr_devel("%s: 0x%llx -- USER_REGION_ID\n", __func__, ea);
> @@ -133,6 +131,7 @@ int copro_calculate_slb(struct mm_struct *mm, u64 ea, struct copro_slb *slb)
>  	vsid |= mmu_psize_defs[psize].sllp |
>  		((ssize == MMU_SEGSIZE_1T) ? SLB_VSID_B_1T : 0);
>  
> +	slb->esid = (ea & (ssize == MMU_SEGSIZE_1T ? ESID_MASK_1T : ESID_MASK)) | SLB_ESID_V;
>  	slb->vsid = vsid;
>  
>  	return 0;
> -- 
> 2.1.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-28  8:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-28  3:25 [PATCH v2] CXL: Fix PSL error due to duplicate segment table entries Ian Munsie
2014-10-28  3:25 ` Ian Munsie
2014-10-28  3:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] CXL: Disable secondary hash in segment table Ian Munsie
2014-10-28  3:25   ` Ian Munsie
2014-10-28  8:12   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-10-28  8:12     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-10-28  3:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] CXL: Refactor cxl_load_segment and find_free_sste Ian Munsie
2014-10-28  3:25   ` Ian Munsie
2014-10-28  8:13   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-10-28  8:13     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-10-28  3:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] powerpc/copro: Use appropriate ESID mask in copro_calculate_slb Ian Munsie
2014-10-28  3:25   ` Ian Munsie
2014-10-28  8:13   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2014-10-28  8:13     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-10-28  3:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] CXL: Fix PSL error due to duplicate segment table entries Ian Munsie
2014-10-28  3:25   ` Ian Munsie
2014-10-28  8:16   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2014-10-28  8:16     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877fzky5lj.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=cbe-oss-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=imunsie@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=jk@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.