From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Pan@freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] drm/amdgpu: prefer snprintf over sprintf
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 11:07:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878r4uudgq.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202401121126.i9VGrvMb-lkp@intel.com>
On Fri, 12 Jan 2024, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Jani,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on drm-misc/drm-misc-next]
> [also build test WARNING on drm-intel/for-linux-next drm-intel/for-linux-next-fixes drm-tip/drm-tip linus/master v6.7 next-20240111]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jani-Nikula/drm-nouveau-acr-ga102-remove-unused-but-set-variable/20240111-014206
> base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc drm-misc-next
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fea7a52924f98b1ac24f4a7e6ba21d7754422430.1704908087.git.jani.nikula%40intel.com
> patch subject: [PATCH 3/6] drm/amdgpu: prefer snprintf over sprintf
> config: sparc64-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240112/202401121126.i9VGrvMb-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240112/202401121126.i9VGrvMb-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401121126.i9VGrvMb-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c: In function 'amdgpu_gfx_kiq_init_ring':
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c:332:61: warning: '%d' directive output may be truncated writing between 1 and 10 bytes into a region of size between 0 and 8 [-Wformat-truncation=]
> 332 | snprintf(ring->name, sizeof(ring->name), "kiq_%d.%d.%d.%d",
> | ^~
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c:332:50: note: directive argument in the range [0, 2147483647]
> 332 | snprintf(ring->name, sizeof(ring->name), "kiq_%d.%d.%d.%d",
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c:332:9: note: 'snprintf' output between 12 and 41 bytes into a destination of size 16
> 332 | snprintf(ring->name, sizeof(ring->name), "kiq_%d.%d.%d.%d",
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 333 | xcc_id, ring->me, ring->pipe, ring->queue);
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
As the commit message says,
This will trade the W=1 warning -Wformat-overflow to
-Wformat-truncation. This lets us enable -Wformat-overflow subsystem
wide.
BR,
Jani.
>
>
> vim +332 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c
>
> 306
> 307 int amdgpu_gfx_kiq_init_ring(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> 308 struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
> 309 struct amdgpu_irq_src *irq, int xcc_id)
> 310 {
> 311 struct amdgpu_kiq *kiq = &adev->gfx.kiq[xcc_id];
> 312 int r = 0;
> 313
> 314 spin_lock_init(&kiq->ring_lock);
> 315
> 316 ring->adev = NULL;
> 317 ring->ring_obj = NULL;
> 318 ring->use_doorbell = true;
> 319 ring->xcc_id = xcc_id;
> 320 ring->vm_hub = AMDGPU_GFXHUB(xcc_id);
> 321 ring->doorbell_index =
> 322 (adev->doorbell_index.kiq +
> 323 xcc_id * adev->doorbell_index.xcc_doorbell_range)
> 324 << 1;
> 325
> 326 r = amdgpu_gfx_kiq_acquire(adev, ring, xcc_id);
> 327 if (r)
> 328 return r;
> 329
> 330 ring->eop_gpu_addr = kiq->eop_gpu_addr;
> 331 ring->no_scheduler = true;
> > 332 snprintf(ring->name, sizeof(ring->name), "kiq_%d.%d.%d.%d",
> 333 xcc_id, ring->me, ring->pipe, ring->queue);
> 334 r = amdgpu_ring_init(adev, ring, 1024, irq, AMDGPU_CP_KIQ_IRQ_DRIVER0,
> 335 AMDGPU_RING_PRIO_DEFAULT, NULL);
> 336 if (r)
> 337 dev_warn(adev->dev, "(%d) failed to init kiq ring\n", r);
> 338
> 339 return r;
> 340 }
> 341
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
Pan@freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] drm/amdgpu: prefer snprintf over sprintf
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 11:07:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878r4uudgq.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202401121126.i9VGrvMb-lkp@intel.com>
On Fri, 12 Jan 2024, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Jani,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on drm-misc/drm-misc-next]
> [also build test WARNING on drm-intel/for-linux-next drm-intel/for-linux-next-fixes drm-tip/drm-tip linus/master v6.7 next-20240111]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jani-Nikula/drm-nouveau-acr-ga102-remove-unused-but-set-variable/20240111-014206
> base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc drm-misc-next
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fea7a52924f98b1ac24f4a7e6ba21d7754422430.1704908087.git.jani.nikula%40intel.com
> patch subject: [PATCH 3/6] drm/amdgpu: prefer snprintf over sprintf
> config: sparc64-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240112/202401121126.i9VGrvMb-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240112/202401121126.i9VGrvMb-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401121126.i9VGrvMb-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c: In function 'amdgpu_gfx_kiq_init_ring':
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c:332:61: warning: '%d' directive output may be truncated writing between 1 and 10 bytes into a region of size between 0 and 8 [-Wformat-truncation=]
> 332 | snprintf(ring->name, sizeof(ring->name), "kiq_%d.%d.%d.%d",
> | ^~
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c:332:50: note: directive argument in the range [0, 2147483647]
> 332 | snprintf(ring->name, sizeof(ring->name), "kiq_%d.%d.%d.%d",
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c:332:9: note: 'snprintf' output between 12 and 41 bytes into a destination of size 16
> 332 | snprintf(ring->name, sizeof(ring->name), "kiq_%d.%d.%d.%d",
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 333 | xcc_id, ring->me, ring->pipe, ring->queue);
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
As the commit message says,
This will trade the W=1 warning -Wformat-overflow to
-Wformat-truncation. This lets us enable -Wformat-overflow subsystem
wide.
BR,
Jani.
>
>
> vim +332 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_gfx.c
>
> 306
> 307 int amdgpu_gfx_kiq_init_ring(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> 308 struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
> 309 struct amdgpu_irq_src *irq, int xcc_id)
> 310 {
> 311 struct amdgpu_kiq *kiq = &adev->gfx.kiq[xcc_id];
> 312 int r = 0;
> 313
> 314 spin_lock_init(&kiq->ring_lock);
> 315
> 316 ring->adev = NULL;
> 317 ring->ring_obj = NULL;
> 318 ring->use_doorbell = true;
> 319 ring->xcc_id = xcc_id;
> 320 ring->vm_hub = AMDGPU_GFXHUB(xcc_id);
> 321 ring->doorbell_index =
> 322 (adev->doorbell_index.kiq +
> 323 xcc_id * adev->doorbell_index.xcc_doorbell_range)
> 324 << 1;
> 325
> 326 r = amdgpu_gfx_kiq_acquire(adev, ring, xcc_id);
> 327 if (r)
> 328 return r;
> 329
> 330 ring->eop_gpu_addr = kiq->eop_gpu_addr;
> 331 ring->no_scheduler = true;
> > 332 snprintf(ring->name, sizeof(ring->name), "kiq_%d.%d.%d.%d",
> 333 xcc_id, ring->me, ring->pipe, ring->queue);
> 334 r = amdgpu_ring_init(adev, ring, 1024, irq, AMDGPU_CP_KIQ_IRQ_DRIVER0,
> 335 AMDGPU_RING_PRIO_DEFAULT, NULL);
> 336 if (r)
> 337 dev_warn(adev->dev, "(%d) failed to init kiq ring\n", r);
> 338
> 339 return r;
> 340 }
> 341
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-12 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-10 17:39 [PATCH 0/6] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem Jani Nikula
2024-01-10 17:39 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/nouveau/acr/ga102: remove unused but set variable Jani Nikula
2024-01-10 17:39 ` Jani Nikula
2024-01-31 12:50 ` Jani Nikula
2024-01-31 12:50 ` Jani Nikula
2024-01-31 19:01 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-01-31 19:01 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-02-01 9:41 ` Jani Nikula
2024-02-01 9:41 ` Jani Nikula
2024-01-10 17:39 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/nouveau/svm: remove unused but set variables Jani Nikula
2024-01-10 17:39 ` Jani Nikula
2024-01-31 12:51 ` Jani Nikula
2024-01-31 12:51 ` Jani Nikula
2024-01-31 19:10 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-01-31 19:10 ` Danilo Krummrich
2024-02-01 9:42 ` Jani Nikula
2024-02-01 9:42 ` Jani Nikula
2024-01-10 17:39 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/amdgpu: prefer snprintf over sprintf Jani Nikula
2024-01-12 4:09 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-12 4:09 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-12 9:07 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-01-12 9:07 ` Jani Nikula
2024-01-12 14:57 ` Alex Deucher
2024-01-31 12:48 ` Jani Nikula
2024-01-31 12:48 ` Jani Nikula
2024-01-10 17:39 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/imx: " Jani Nikula
2024-01-10 17:39 ` Jani Nikula
2024-01-12 10:49 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-12 10:49 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-12 14:20 ` Philipp Zabel
2024-01-31 12:49 ` Jani Nikula
2024-01-10 17:39 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm: enable (most) W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem Jani Nikula
2024-01-10 17:39 ` Jani Nikula
2024-01-10 20:15 ` Hamza Mahfooz
2024-01-10 20:15 ` Hamza Mahfooz
2024-01-11 9:43 ` Jani Nikula
2024-01-11 9:43 ` Jani Nikula
2024-01-10 17:39 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm: Add CONFIG_DRM_WERROR Jani Nikula
2024-01-10 20:17 ` Hamza Mahfooz
2024-01-10 18:52 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem (rev2) Patchwork
2024-01-10 18:52 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2024-01-10 19:03 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2024-01-10 23:00 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2024-04-04 15:16 ` [PATCH 0/6] drm: enable W=1 warnings by default across the subsystem Aishwarya TCV
2024-04-05 9:57 ` Jani Nikula
2024-04-05 10:28 ` Aishwarya TCV
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878r4uudgq.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=Pan@freedesktop.org \
--cc=Xinhui.Pan@amd.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.