From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, daniel@ffwll.ch,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, airlied@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: use sysfs_emit() to instead of scnprintf()
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 12:50:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878rjm2kfm.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202212011053265568903@zte.com.cn>
On Thu, 01 Dec 2022, <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn> wrote:
> From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
>
> Replace the open-code with sysfs_emit() to simplify the code.
I was going to push this, but noticed the function has a third
scnprintf(), and the last two play together with count. It would be
confusing to have a mix of sysfs_emit() and scnprintf(). The third one
can't be blindly converted to sysfs_emit() because it writes at an
offset not aligned by PAGE_SIZE.
So I'm not taking this.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mitigations.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mitigations.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mitigations.c
> index def7302ef7fe..2b7aaaefb3a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mitigations.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mitigations.c
> @@ -102,10 +102,10 @@ static int mitigations_get(char *buffer, const struct kernel_param *kp)
> bool enable;
>
> if (!local)
> - return scnprintf(buffer, PAGE_SIZE, "%s\n", "off");
> + return sysfs_emit(buffer, "%s\n", "off");
>
> if (local & BIT(BITS_PER_LONG - 1)) {
> - count = scnprintf(buffer, PAGE_SIZE, "%s,", "auto");
> + count = sysfs_emit(buffer, "%s,", "auto");
> enable = false;
> } else {
> enable = true;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com
Cc: tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: use sysfs_emit() to instead of scnprintf()
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 12:50:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878rjm2kfm.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202212011053265568903@zte.com.cn>
On Thu, 01 Dec 2022, <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn> wrote:
> From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
>
> Replace the open-code with sysfs_emit() to simplify the code.
I was going to push this, but noticed the function has a third
scnprintf(), and the last two play together with count. It would be
confusing to have a mix of sysfs_emit() and scnprintf(). The third one
can't be blindly converted to sysfs_emit() because it writes at an
offset not aligned by PAGE_SIZE.
So I'm not taking this.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mitigations.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mitigations.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mitigations.c
> index def7302ef7fe..2b7aaaefb3a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mitigations.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mitigations.c
> @@ -102,10 +102,10 @@ static int mitigations_get(char *buffer, const struct kernel_param *kp)
> bool enable;
>
> if (!local)
> - return scnprintf(buffer, PAGE_SIZE, "%s\n", "off");
> + return sysfs_emit(buffer, "%s\n", "off");
>
> if (local & BIT(BITS_PER_LONG - 1)) {
> - count = scnprintf(buffer, PAGE_SIZE, "%s,", "auto");
> + count = sysfs_emit(buffer, "%s,", "auto");
> enable = false;
> } else {
> enable = true;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn, joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com
Cc: rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com,
airlied@gmail.com, daniel@ffwll.ch,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: use sysfs_emit() to instead of scnprintf()
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 12:50:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878rjm2kfm.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202212011053265568903@zte.com.cn>
On Thu, 01 Dec 2022, <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn> wrote:
> From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
>
> Replace the open-code with sysfs_emit() to simplify the code.
I was going to push this, but noticed the function has a third
scnprintf(), and the last two play together with count. It would be
confusing to have a mix of sysfs_emit() and scnprintf(). The third one
can't be blindly converted to sysfs_emit() because it writes at an
offset not aligned by PAGE_SIZE.
So I'm not taking this.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mitigations.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mitigations.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mitigations.c
> index def7302ef7fe..2b7aaaefb3a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mitigations.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_mitigations.c
> @@ -102,10 +102,10 @@ static int mitigations_get(char *buffer, const struct kernel_param *kp)
> bool enable;
>
> if (!local)
> - return scnprintf(buffer, PAGE_SIZE, "%s\n", "off");
> + return sysfs_emit(buffer, "%s\n", "off");
>
> if (local & BIT(BITS_PER_LONG - 1)) {
> - count = scnprintf(buffer, PAGE_SIZE, "%s,", "auto");
> + count = sysfs_emit(buffer, "%s,", "auto");
> enable = false;
> } else {
> enable = true;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-05 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-01 2:53 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: use sysfs_emit() to instead of scnprintf() ye.xingchen
2022-12-01 2:53 ` ye.xingchen
2022-12-01 2:53 ` ye.xingchen
2022-12-01 17:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2022-12-02 5:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2022-12-05 10:50 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2022-12-05 10:50 ` [PATCH] " Jani Nikula
2022-12-05 10:50 ` Jani Nikula
2022-12-06 4:26 ` [Intel-gfx] " Bagas Sanjaya
2022-12-06 4:26 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-12-06 4:26 ` Bagas Sanjaya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878rjm2kfm.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.