All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Baochen Qiang <bqiang@codeaurora.org>
Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org,  linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ath11k: support one MSI vector
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 12:30:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878rxpiudp.fsf@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211026041616.4956-1-bqiang@codeaurora.org> (Baochen Qiang's message of "Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:16:16 +0800")

Baochen Qiang <bqiang@codeaurora.org> writes:

> This patch set is to support one MSI vector for QCA6390.
>
> Depends-On:
>   1. ath11k: Fix crash caused by uninitialized TX ring
>   https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20211026011605.58615-1-quic_bqiang@quicinc.com/
>
> Baochen Qiang (1):
>   ath11k: Set IRQ affinity to CPU0 in case of one MSI vector
>
> Carl Huang (6):
>   ath11k: get msi_data again after request_irq is called
>   ath11k: add CE and ext IRQ flag to indicate irq_handler
>   ath11k: use ATH11K_PCI_IRQ_DP_OFFSET for DP IRQ
>   ath11k: refactor multiple MSI vector implementation
>   ath11k: supports one MSI vector
>   ath11k: do not restore ASPM in case of single MSI vector

I assume this is v2 of Carl's patchset:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/cover/20201223030225.2345-1-cjhuang@codeaurora.org/

Can you provide a changelog? No need to resend because of that, just a
reply to this thread enough.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

-- 
ath11k mailing list
ath11k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Baochen Qiang <bqiang@codeaurora.org>
Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ath11k: support one MSI vector
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 12:30:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878rxpiudp.fsf@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211026041616.4956-1-bqiang@codeaurora.org> (Baochen Qiang's message of "Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:16:16 +0800")

Baochen Qiang <bqiang@codeaurora.org> writes:

> This patch set is to support one MSI vector for QCA6390.
>
> Depends-On:
>   1. ath11k: Fix crash caused by uninitialized TX ring
>   https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20211026011605.58615-1-quic_bqiang@quicinc.com/
>
> Baochen Qiang (1):
>   ath11k: Set IRQ affinity to CPU0 in case of one MSI vector
>
> Carl Huang (6):
>   ath11k: get msi_data again after request_irq is called
>   ath11k: add CE and ext IRQ flag to indicate irq_handler
>   ath11k: use ATH11K_PCI_IRQ_DP_OFFSET for DP IRQ
>   ath11k: refactor multiple MSI vector implementation
>   ath11k: supports one MSI vector
>   ath11k: do not restore ASPM in case of single MSI vector

I assume this is v2 of Carl's patchset:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/cover/20201223030225.2345-1-cjhuang@codeaurora.org/

Can you provide a changelog? No need to resend because of that, just a
reply to this thread enough.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-15 10:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-26  4:16 [PATCH 0/7] ath11k: support one MSI vector Baochen Qiang
2021-10-26  4:16 ` Baochen Qiang
2021-11-15 10:30 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2021-11-15 10:30   ` Kalle Valo
2021-11-16  2:50   ` Baochen Qiang
2021-11-16  2:50     ` Baochen Qiang
2021-11-19 12:31     ` Kalle Valo
2021-11-19 12:31       ` Kalle Valo
2021-11-22  2:03       ` Baochen Qiang
2021-11-22  2:03         ` Baochen Qiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878rxpiudp.fsf@codeaurora.org \
    --to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=bqiang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.