* ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP"
2018-05-16 17:21 [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP" Lucas De Marchi
@ 2018-05-16 17:37 ` Patchwork
2018-05-16 17:52 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-05-16 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lucas De Marchi; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP"
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/43278/
State : warning
== Summary ==
$ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip
0b54952e8cb7 Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP"
-:10: WARNING:COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
#10:
[drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
-:34: WARNING:BAD_SIGN_OFF: Duplicate signature
#34:
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 checks, 31 lines checked
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP"
2018-05-16 17:21 [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP" Lucas De Marchi
2018-05-16 17:37 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
@ 2018-05-16 17:52 ` Patchwork
2018-05-16 21:09 ` [PATCH] " Manasi Navare
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-05-16 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lucas De Marchi; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP"
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/43278/
State : success
== Summary ==
= CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4193 -> Patchwork_9021 =
== Summary - WARNING ==
Minor unknown changes coming with Patchwork_9021 need to be verified
manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_9021, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/43278/revisions/1/mbox/
== Possible new issues ==
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_9021:
=== IGT changes ===
==== Warnings ====
igt@gem_exec_gttfill@basic:
fi-pnv-d510: SKIP -> PASS
== Known issues ==
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_9021 that come from known issues:
=== IGT changes ===
==== Issues hit ====
igt@kms_chamelium@dp-edid-read:
fi-kbl-7500u: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#103841)
==== Possible fixes ====
igt@gem_mmap_gtt@basic-small-bo-tiledx:
fi-gdg-551: FAIL (fdo#102575) -> PASS
igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@nonblocking-crc-pipe-a-frame-sequence:
fi-cfl-s3: FAIL (fdo#103481) -> PASS +1
igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
fi-cnl-psr: DMESG-WARN (fdo#104951) -> PASS
fdo#102575 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102575
fdo#103481 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103481
fdo#103841 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103841
fdo#104951 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104951
== Participating hosts (41 -> 36) ==
Missing (5): fi-ctg-p8600 fi-ilk-m540 fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-skl-6700hq
== Build changes ==
* Linux: CI_DRM_4193 -> Patchwork_9021
CI_DRM_4193: 9322e3903ce6c89bde0c24877fe730b808427caf @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_4485: eccae1360d6d01e73c6af2bd97122cef708207ef @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_9021: 0b54952e8cb7b3bf9f4fe1ce697223e446573767 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
piglit_4485: 62ef6b0db8967e7021fd3e0b57d03ff164b984fe @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit
== Linux commits ==
0b54952e8cb7 Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP"
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_9021/issues.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP"
2018-05-16 17:21 [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP" Lucas De Marchi
2018-05-16 17:37 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2018-05-16 17:52 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
@ 2018-05-16 21:09 ` Manasi Navare
2018-05-17 9:54 ` Jani Nikula
2018-05-17 2:04 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Manasi Navare @ 2018-05-16 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lucas De Marchi; +Cc: Daniel Vetter, intel-gfx, Dave Airlie
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:21:10AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> This reverts commit c0cfb10d9e1de490e36d3b9d4228c0ea0ca30677.
>
> This fails on a Dell XPS13 9350 machine giving me just a black screen.
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
>
> On a working kernel, previous to this commit I have:
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 270000, Lane count = 4
>
> Cc: Clinton Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
> Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> ---
>
> I'm sending this for reference and discussion only, but it doesn't seem
> to be the right fix. Not only because it would mean IGT failing on CI,
> but also because we seem to be having several link training running
> concurrently and the last one failing leaves the panel at that state.
I just looked at the full log of the failing case and in that case it first tries training
at the highest link rate, lane count for eDP and passes before enabling pipe A.
But then the panel soon sends a short pulse indicating loss of signal which
causes the driver to call intel_dp_check_link_status() where drm_dp_channel_eq_ok() check
fails and thats why you see multiple link training attempts there which fail and eventually result in a
black screen.
Now in case of passing case, whats interesting is that it starts with same highest link rate 5.4Gbps
but fails the very first time and now the fallback code kicks in and lowers the link rate to 2.7Gbps.
Now in this particular case, the edp panel's native resolution of 3200 x 1800 fits even for the lowered
link rate of 2.7Gbps and it retrains at that and passes so we get a recovered modeset.
So I am thinking because of such cases, we should probably not asusme that the native mode will not
fit the lowered fallback link rate. So I guess we should still try fallback for eDP as long
as its not pruning the native mode on the panel.
Alternatively I think if we start from lowest link rate and lane count like we do
for DP then it will pick the lowest possible link rate required for the native mode and we might
not run into this situation.
Jani, Ville any thoughts on which approach should be chosen?
Regards
Manasi
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c | 26 +++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> index f59b59bb0a21..78f1fe934da3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> @@ -330,22 +330,14 @@ intel_dp_start_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> return;
>
> failure_handling:
> - /* Dont fallback and prune modes if its eDP */
> - if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Link Training failed at link rate = %d, lane count = %d",
> - intel_connector->base.base.id,
> - intel_connector->base.name,
> - intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
> - if (!intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(intel_dp,
> - intel_dp->link_rate,
> - intel_dp->lane_count))
> - /* Schedule a Hotplug Uevent to userspace to start modeset */
> - schedule_work(&intel_connector->modeset_retry_work);
> - } else {
> - DRM_ERROR("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Link Training failed at link rate = %d, lane count = %d",
> - intel_connector->base.base.id,
> - intel_connector->base.name,
> - intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
> - }
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Link Training failed at link rate = %d, lane count = %d",
> + intel_connector->base.base.id,
> + intel_connector->base.name,
> + intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
> + if (!intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(intel_dp,
> + intel_dp->link_rate,
> + intel_dp->lane_count))
> + /* Schedule a Hotplug Uevent to userspace to start modeset */
> + schedule_work(&intel_connector->modeset_retry_work);
> return;
> }
> --
> 2.17.0
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP"
2018-05-16 21:09 ` [PATCH] " Manasi Navare
@ 2018-05-17 9:54 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2018-05-17 9:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manasi Navare, Lucas De Marchi; +Cc: Daniel Vetter, intel-gfx, Dave Airlie
On Wed, 16 May 2018, Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:21:10AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> This reverts commit c0cfb10d9e1de490e36d3b9d4228c0ea0ca30677.
>>
>> This fails on a Dell XPS13 9350 machine giving me just a black screen.
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
>>
>> On a working kernel, previous to this commit I have:
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
>> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 270000, Lane count = 4
>>
>> Cc: Clinton Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
>> Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
>> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
>> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>> ---
>>
>> I'm sending this for reference and discussion only, but it doesn't seem
>> to be the right fix. Not only because it would mean IGT failing on CI,
>> but also because we seem to be having several link training running
>> concurrently and the last one failing leaves the panel at that state.
>
> I just looked at the full log of the failing case and in that case it
> first tries training at the highest link rate, lane count for eDP and
> passes before enabling pipe A. But then the panel soon sends a short
> pulse indicating loss of signal which causes the driver to call
> intel_dp_check_link_status() where drm_dp_channel_eq_ok() check fails
> and thats why you see multiple link training attempts there which fail
> and eventually result in a black screen.
We also have a bug [1] where the link training succeeds after the hpd,
but the display starts to flicker.
[1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105267
> Now in case of passing case, whats interesting is that it starts with
> same highest link rate 5.4Gbps but fails the very first time and now
> the fallback code kicks in and lowers the link rate to 2.7Gbps. Now
> in this particular case, the edp panel's native resolution of 3200 x
> 1800 fits even for the lowered link rate of 2.7Gbps and it retrains at
> that and passes so we get a recovered modeset.
>
> So I am thinking because of such cases, we should probably not asusme
> that the native mode will not fit the lowered fallback link rate. So I
> guess we should still try fallback for eDP as long as its not pruning
> the native mode on the panel.
>
> Alternatively I think if we start from lowest link rate and lane count
> like we do for DP then it will pick the lowest possible link rate
> required for the native mode and we might not run into this situation.
>
> Jani, Ville any thoughts on which approach should be chosen?
See [2].
BR,
Jani.
[2] http://marc.info/?i=87sh6qzqpp.fsf@intel.com
>
> Regards
> Manasi
>
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c | 26 +++++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
>> index f59b59bb0a21..78f1fe934da3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
>> @@ -330,22 +330,14 @@ intel_dp_start_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> return;
>>
>> failure_handling:
>> - /* Dont fallback and prune modes if its eDP */
>> - if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
>> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Link Training failed at link rate = %d, lane count = %d",
>> - intel_connector->base.base.id,
>> - intel_connector->base.name,
>> - intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
>> - if (!intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(intel_dp,
>> - intel_dp->link_rate,
>> - intel_dp->lane_count))
>> - /* Schedule a Hotplug Uevent to userspace to start modeset */
>> - schedule_work(&intel_connector->modeset_retry_work);
>> - } else {
>> - DRM_ERROR("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Link Training failed at link rate = %d, lane count = %d",
>> - intel_connector->base.base.id,
>> - intel_connector->base.name,
>> - intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
>> - }
>> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Link Training failed at link rate = %d, lane count = %d",
>> + intel_connector->base.base.id,
>> + intel_connector->base.name,
>> + intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
>> + if (!intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(intel_dp,
>> + intel_dp->link_rate,
>> + intel_dp->lane_count))
>> + /* Schedule a Hotplug Uevent to userspace to start modeset */
>> + schedule_work(&intel_connector->modeset_retry_work);
>> return;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.17.0
>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP"
2018-05-16 17:21 [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP" Lucas De Marchi
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2018-05-16 21:09 ` [PATCH] " Manasi Navare
@ 2018-05-17 2:04 ` Patchwork
2018-05-17 7:20 ` [PATCH] " Jani Nikula
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-05-17 2:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lucas De Marchi; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP"
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/43278/
State : success
== Summary ==
= CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4193_full -> Patchwork_9021_full =
== Summary - WARNING ==
Minor unknown changes coming with Patchwork_9021_full need to be verified
manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_9021_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/43278/revisions/1/mbox/
== Possible new issues ==
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_9021_full:
=== IGT changes ===
==== Warnings ====
igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-render:
shard-kbl: SKIP -> PASS
igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-flip-before-cursor-atomic:
shard-snb: PASS -> SKIP
== Known issues ==
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_9021_full that come from known issues:
=== IGT changes ===
==== Issues hit ====
igt@gem_eio@execbuf:
shard-glk: PASS -> DMESG-WARN (fdo#106523) +1
igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-immediate:
shard-hsw: PASS -> DMESG-WARN (fdo#106523)
igt@gem_eio@suspend:
shard-apl: PASS -> DMESG-WARN (fdo#106523) +1
igt@kms_cursor_crc@cursor-64x64-suspend:
shard-glk: PASS -> INCOMPLETE (k.org#198133, fdo#103359)
igt@kms_flip@2x-dpms-vs-vblank-race:
shard-glk: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#103060)
igt@kms_flip@2x-plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible:
shard-hsw: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#100368)
igt@kms_flip@2x-plain-flip-ts-check:
shard-glk: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#100368)
==== Possible fixes ====
igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vecs0-s3:
shard-kbl: INCOMPLETE (fdo#103665) -> PASS
igt@gem_eio@execbuf:
shard-hsw: DMESG-WARN (fdo#106523) -> PASS
shard-snb: DMESG-WARN (fdo#106523) -> PASS
igt@gem_eio@wait-wedge-1us:
shard-apl: DMESG-WARN (fdo#106523) -> PASS +1
shard-glk: DMESG-WARN (fdo#106523) -> PASS
igt@kms_atomic_transition@1x-modeset-transitions-nonblocking-fencing:
shard-glk: FAIL (fdo#105703) -> PASS
igt@kms_cursor_legacy@2x-nonblocking-modeset-vs-cursor-atomic:
shard-glk: FAIL (fdo#105454) -> PASS
igt@kms_flip@2x-plain-flip-ts-check-interruptible:
shard-glk: FAIL (fdo#100368) -> PASS
igt@kms_flip@dpms-vs-vblank-race:
shard-hsw: FAIL (fdo#103060) -> PASS
igt@kms_setmode@basic:
shard-apl: FAIL (fdo#99912) -> PASS
fdo#100368 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100368
fdo#103060 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103060
fdo#103359 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103359
fdo#103665 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103665
fdo#105454 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105454
fdo#105703 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105703
fdo#106523 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106523
fdo#99912 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99912
k.org#198133 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198133
== Participating hosts (5 -> 5) ==
No changes in participating hosts
== Build changes ==
* Linux: CI_DRM_4193 -> Patchwork_9021
CI_DRM_4193: 9322e3903ce6c89bde0c24877fe730b808427caf @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_4485: eccae1360d6d01e73c6af2bd97122cef708207ef @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_9021: 0b54952e8cb7b3bf9f4fe1ce697223e446573767 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
piglit_4485: 62ef6b0db8967e7021fd3e0b57d03ff164b984fe @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_9021/shards.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP"
2018-05-16 17:21 [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP" Lucas De Marchi
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2018-05-17 2:04 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2018-05-17 7:20 ` Jani Nikula
2018-05-18 12:13 ` Jani Nikula
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2018-05-17 7:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lucas De Marchi, intel-gfx; +Cc: Daniel Vetter, Dave Airlie
On Wed, 16 May 2018, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> wrote:
> This reverts commit c0cfb10d9e1de490e36d3b9d4228c0ea0ca30677.
>
> This fails on a Dell XPS13 9350 machine giving me just a black screen.
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
>
> On a working kernel, previous to this commit I have:
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 270000, Lane count = 4
>
> Cc: Clinton Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
> Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> ---
>
> I'm sending this for reference and discussion only, but it doesn't seem
> to be the right fix. Not only because it would mean IGT failing on CI,
> but also because we seem to be having several link training running
> concurrently and the last one failing leaves the panel at that state.
Try http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180509071321.28563-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
BR,
Jani.
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c | 26 +++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> index f59b59bb0a21..78f1fe934da3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
> @@ -330,22 +330,14 @@ intel_dp_start_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> return;
>
> failure_handling:
> - /* Dont fallback and prune modes if its eDP */
> - if (!intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Link Training failed at link rate = %d, lane count = %d",
> - intel_connector->base.base.id,
> - intel_connector->base.name,
> - intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
> - if (!intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(intel_dp,
> - intel_dp->link_rate,
> - intel_dp->lane_count))
> - /* Schedule a Hotplug Uevent to userspace to start modeset */
> - schedule_work(&intel_connector->modeset_retry_work);
> - } else {
> - DRM_ERROR("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Link Training failed at link rate = %d, lane count = %d",
> - intel_connector->base.base.id,
> - intel_connector->base.name,
> - intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
> - }
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[CONNECTOR:%d:%s] Link Training failed at link rate = %d, lane count = %d",
> + intel_connector->base.base.id,
> + intel_connector->base.name,
> + intel_dp->link_rate, intel_dp->lane_count);
> + if (!intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(intel_dp,
> + intel_dp->link_rate,
> + intel_dp->lane_count))
> + /* Schedule a Hotplug Uevent to userspace to start modeset */
> + schedule_work(&intel_connector->modeset_retry_work);
> return;
> }
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP"
2018-05-16 17:21 [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP" Lucas De Marchi
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2018-05-17 7:20 ` [PATCH] " Jani Nikula
@ 2018-05-18 12:13 ` Jani Nikula
2018-05-18 12:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP" (rev2) Patchwork
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2018-05-18 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lucas De Marchi, intel-gfx; +Cc: Daniel Vetter, Dave Airlie
On Wed, 16 May 2018, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> wrote:
> This reverts commit c0cfb10d9e1de490e36d3b9d4228c0ea0ca30677.
>
> This fails on a Dell XPS13 9350 machine giving me just a black screen.
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] *ERROR* [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
>
> On a working kernel, previous to this commit I have:
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training failed at link rate = 540000, lane count = 4
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 270000, Lane count = 4
We had this kind of issues *before* any link fallback, way back when we
just plunged on ignoring issues. Actually I imagined we were going to do
that for eDP when c0cfb10d9e1d ("drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training
fallback or prune modes on EDP") was introduced, but looks like we
don't.
Does this work? It might not, because way back we used to have a full
clock recovery step within channel eq error path, and that then worked
just fine.
BR,
Jani.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
index 3fcaa98b9055..7315ee01f984 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c
@@ -323,7 +323,8 @@ intel_dp_start_link_train(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
struct intel_connector *intel_connector = intel_dp->attached_connector;
- if (!intel_dp_link_training_clock_recovery(intel_dp))
+ if (!intel_dp_link_training_clock_recovery(intel_dp) &&
+ !intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
goto failure_handling;
if (!intel_dp_link_training_channel_equalization(intel_dp))
goto failure_handling;
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP" (rev2)
2018-05-16 17:21 [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP" Lucas De Marchi
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2018-05-18 12:13 ` Jani Nikula
@ 2018-05-18 12:31 ` Patchwork
2018-05-18 12:51 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-05-18 16:52 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-05-18 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP" (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/43278/
State : warning
== Summary ==
$ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip
4217d2e38954 Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP"
-:8: ERROR:GIT_COMMIT_ID: Please use git commit description style 'commit <12+ chars of sha1> ("<title line>")' - ie: 'commit c0cfb10d9e1d ("drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP")'
#8:
> This reverts commit c0cfb10d9e1de490e36d3b9d4228c0ea0ca30677.
-:11: WARNING:COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
#11:
> [drm:intel_dp_start_link_train [i915]] [CONNECTOR:59:eDP-1] Link Training Passed at Link Rate = 540000, Lane count = 4
-:30: ERROR:GIT_COMMIT_ID: Please use git commit description style 'commit <12+ chars of sha1> ("<title line>")' - ie: 'commit c0cfb10d9e1d ("drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP")'
#30:
that for eDP when c0cfb10d9e1d ("drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training
-:54: ERROR:MISSING_SIGN_OFF: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)
total: 3 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 9 lines checked
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP" (rev2)
2018-05-16 17:21 [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP" Lucas De Marchi
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2018-05-18 12:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP" (rev2) Patchwork
@ 2018-05-18 12:51 ` Patchwork
2018-05-18 16:52 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-05-18 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP" (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/43278/
State : success
== Summary ==
= CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4206 -> Patchwork_9049 =
== Summary - WARNING ==
Minor unknown changes coming with Patchwork_9049 need to be verified
manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_9049, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/43278/revisions/2/mbox/
== Possible new issues ==
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_9049:
=== IGT changes ===
==== Warnings ====
igt@gem_exec_gttfill@basic:
fi-pnv-d510: PASS -> SKIP
== Known issues ==
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_9049 that come from known issues:
=== IGT changes ===
==== Issues hit ====
igt@gem_mmap_gtt@basic-small-bo-tiledx:
fi-gdg-551: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#102575)
igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic:
fi-cnl-y3: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#104724, fdo#103167)
igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-b:
fi-snb-2520m: PASS -> INCOMPLETE (fdo#103713)
igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-c:
fi-bxt-dsi: PASS -> INCOMPLETE (fdo#103927)
==== Possible fixes ====
igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@read-crc-pipe-b-frame-sequence:
fi-hsw-4770r: FAIL (fdo#103481) -> PASS
fdo#102575 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102575
fdo#103167 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103167
fdo#103481 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103481
fdo#103713 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103713
fdo#103927 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103927
fdo#104724 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104724
== Participating hosts (43 -> 39) ==
Missing (4): fi-ilk-m540 fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-skl-6700hq
== Build changes ==
* Linux: CI_DRM_4206 -> Patchwork_9049
CI_DRM_4206: e84f2b258f41e62419c58fcf0b85d917abbe849e @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_4487: eccae1360d6d01e73c6af2bd97122cef708207ef @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_9049: 4217d2e389544979635223f9364b6a26ff525760 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
piglit_4487: 6ab75f7eb5e1dccbb773e1739beeb2d7cbd6ad0d @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit
== Linux commits ==
4217d2e38954 Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP"
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_9049/issues.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP" (rev2)
2018-05-16 17:21 [PATCH] Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP" Lucas De Marchi
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2018-05-18 12:51 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
@ 2018-05-18 16:52 ` Patchwork
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2018-05-18 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: Revert "drm/i915/edp: Do not do link training fallback or prune modes on EDP" (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/43278/
State : success
== Summary ==
= CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4206_full -> Patchwork_9049_full =
== Summary - WARNING ==
Minor unknown changes coming with Patchwork_9049_full need to be verified
manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_9049_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/43278/revisions/2/mbox/
== Possible new issues ==
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_9049_full:
=== IGT changes ===
==== Warnings ====
igt@gem_exec_schedule@deep-bsd2:
shard-kbl: PASS -> SKIP +2
igt@gem_mocs_settings@mocs-rc6-dirty-render:
shard-kbl: SKIP -> PASS +1
igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursora-vs-flipa-atomic:
shard-apl: SKIP -> PASS +28
igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-query-forked-busy-hang:
shard-apl: PASS -> SKIP +76
== Known issues ==
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_9049_full that come from known issues:
=== IGT changes ===
==== Issues hit ====
igt@gem_ctx_isolation@rcs0-s3:
shard-apl: PASS -> DMESG-WARN (fdo#103558)
igt@kms_atomic_transition@1x-modeset-transitions-nonblocking-fencing:
shard-glk: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#105703)
igt@kms_cursor_crc@cursor-64x64-suspend:
shard-snb: PASS -> DMESG-WARN (fdo#102365)
igt@kms_cursor_legacy@2x-long-flip-vs-cursor-atomic:
shard-hsw: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#104873)
igt@kms_cursor_legacy@2x-nonblocking-modeset-vs-cursor-atomic:
shard-glk: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#106509, fdo#105454)
igt@kms_flip@dpms-vs-vblank-race-interruptible:
shard-hsw: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#103060)
igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-ts-check-interruptible:
shard-glk: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#100368)
igt@kms_flip_tiling@flip-to-x-tiled:
shard-glk: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#104724)
igt@kms_flip_tiling@flip-to-y-tiled:
shard-glk: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#103822, fdo#104724)
igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-scndscrn-pri-indfb-draw-pwrite:
shard-hsw: PASS -> DMESG-WARN (fdo#102614)
igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-accuracy-idle:
shard-hsw: PASS -> FAIL (fdo#102583)
==== Possible fixes ====
igt@drv_selftest@live_hangcheck:
shard-apl: DMESG-FAIL (fdo#106560) -> PASS
igt@kms_ccs@pipe-b-crc-sprite-planes-basic:
shard-apl: FAIL (fdo#106510) -> SKIP
igt@kms_cursor_legacy@2x-long-flip-vs-cursor-legacy:
shard-glk: FAIL (fdo#104873) -> PASS
igt@kms_flip@2x-flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible:
shard-glk: FAIL (fdo#105707) -> PASS
igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank:
shard-hsw: FAIL (fdo#105707) -> PASS
shard-apl: FAIL (fdo#105363, fdo#102887) -> SKIP
igt@kms_flip_tiling@flip-x-tiled:
shard-glk: FAIL (fdo#104724) -> PASS
igt@kms_flip_tiling@flip-y-tiled:
shard-glk: FAIL (fdo#103822, fdo#104724) -> PASS
igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-offscren-pri-indfb-draw-blt:
shard-kbl: DMESG-WARN (fdo#103313, fdo#103558, fdo#105602) -> PASS +3
igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-offscren-pri-indfb-draw-mmap-gtt:
shard-kbl: DMESG-WARN (fdo#103558, fdo#105602) -> PASS +28
igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-suspend:
shard-kbl: DMESG-WARN (fdo#103841, fdo#103558, fdo#105602) -> PASS
igt@perf_pmu@rc6-runtime-pm-long:
shard-apl: DMESG-WARN (fdo#103558, fdo#105602) -> PASS +34
fdo#100368 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100368
fdo#102365 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102365
fdo#102583 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102583
fdo#102614 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102614
fdo#102887 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102887
fdo#103060 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103060
fdo#103313 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103313
fdo#103558 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103558
fdo#103822 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103822
fdo#103841 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103841
fdo#104724 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104724
fdo#104873 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104873
fdo#105363 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105363
fdo#105454 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105454
fdo#105602 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105602
fdo#105703 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105703
fdo#105707 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105707
fdo#106509 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106509
fdo#106510 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106510
fdo#106560 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106560
== Participating hosts (9 -> 9) ==
No changes in participating hosts
== Build changes ==
* Linux: CI_DRM_4206 -> Patchwork_9049
CI_DRM_4206: e84f2b258f41e62419c58fcf0b85d917abbe849e @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_4487: eccae1360d6d01e73c6af2bd97122cef708207ef @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_9049: 4217d2e389544979635223f9364b6a26ff525760 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
piglit_4487: 6ab75f7eb5e1dccbb773e1739beeb2d7cbd6ad0d @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_9049/shards.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread