From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Catalin Marinas" <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
"Linux-sh list" <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
"Benjamin Herrenschmidt" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"Chen Gang" <gang.chen@asianux.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
"paulus@samba.org" <paulus@samba.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Michel Lespinasse" <walken@google.com>,
"Hans-Christian Egtvedt" <egtvedt@samfundet.no>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
"Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"Yoshinori Sato" <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
"Helge Deller" <deller@gmx.de>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
"Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"Paul McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: configuration, deleting 'CONFIG_BUG' since always need it.
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 03:09:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878v369fdd.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201305231139.38233.arnd@arndb.de> (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Thu, 23 May 2013 11:39:37 +0200")
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:
> On Thursday 23 May 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > The problem is: trying to fix that will mean the result is a larger
>> > kernel than if you just do the usual arch-implemented thing of placing
>> > an defined faulting instruction at the BUG() site - which defeats the
>> > purpose of turning off CONFIG_BUG.
>>
>> Is __builtin_unreachable() working well these days?
>>
>
> Hmm, I just tried the trivial patch below, which seemed to do the right thing.
> Needs a little more investigation, but that might actually be the correct
> solution. I thought that at some point __builtin_unreachable() was the same
> as "do {} while (1)", but this is not the case with the gcc I was using --
> it just tells gcc that we don't expect to ever get here.
Yes.
We already have this abstracted in compiler.h as the macro unreachable,
so the slight modification of your patch below should handle this case.
For compilers without __builtin_unreachable() unreachable() expands to
do {} while(1) but an infinite loop seems reasonable and preserves the
semantics of the code, unlike the current noop that is do {} while(0).
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bug.h b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
index 7d10f96..9afff7d 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/bug.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
@@ -108,11 +108,11 @@ extern void warn_slowpath_null(const char *file, const int line);
#else /* !CONFIG_BUG */
#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
-#define BUG() do {} while(0)
+#define BUG() unreachable ()
#endif
#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG_ON
-#define BUG_ON(condition) do { if (condition) ; } while(0)
+#define BUG_ON(condition) do { if (condition) unreachable(); } while(0)
#endif
#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_WARN_ON
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
"Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"Chen Gang" <gang.chen@asianux.com>,
"Håvard Skinnemoen" <hskinnemoen@gmail.com>,
"Hans-Christian Egtvedt" <egtvedt@samfundet.no>,
"Mike Frysinger" <vapier@gentoo.org>,
"Yoshinori Sato" <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
"Richard Kuo" <rkuo@codeaurora.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
"Helge Deller" <deller@gmx.de>,
"Benjamin Herrenschmidt" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"paulus@samba.org" <paulus@samba.org>,
"Martin Schwidefsky" <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
linux390@de.ibm.com, "Paul Mundt" <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
"Jeff Dike" <jdike@addtoit.com>,
"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
"Serge Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>,
"Paul McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Akinobu Mita" <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>,
"Catalin Marinas" <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
"Michel Lespinasse" <walken@google.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org"
<uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org>,
linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
"Parisc List" <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
"Linux-sh list" <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
uml-devel <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
uml-user <user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: configuration, deleting 'CONFIG_BUG' since always need it.
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 03:09:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878v369fdd.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201305231139.38233.arnd@arndb.de> (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Thu, 23 May 2013 11:39:37 +0200")
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:
> On Thursday 23 May 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > The problem is: trying to fix that will mean the result is a larger
>> > kernel than if you just do the usual arch-implemented thing of placing
>> > an defined faulting instruction at the BUG() site - which defeats the
>> > purpose of turning off CONFIG_BUG.
>>
>> Is __builtin_unreachable() working well these days?
>>
>
> Hmm, I just tried the trivial patch below, which seemed to do the right thing.
> Needs a little more investigation, but that might actually be the correct
> solution. I thought that at some point __builtin_unreachable() was the same
> as "do {} while (1)", but this is not the case with the gcc I was using --
> it just tells gcc that we don't expect to ever get here.
Yes.
We already have this abstracted in compiler.h as the macro unreachable,
so the slight modification of your patch below should handle this case.
For compilers without __builtin_unreachable() unreachable() expands to
do {} while(1) but an infinite loop seems reasonable and preserves the
semantics of the code, unlike the current noop that is do {} while(0).
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bug.h b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
index 7d10f96..9afff7d 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/bug.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
@@ -108,11 +108,11 @@ extern void warn_slowpath_null(const char *file, const int line);
#else /* !CONFIG_BUG */
#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
-#define BUG() do {} while(0)
+#define BUG() unreachable ()
#endif
#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG_ON
-#define BUG_ON(condition) do { if (condition) ; } while(0)
+#define BUG_ON(condition) do { if (condition) unreachable(); } while(0)
#endif
#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_WARN_ON
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Catalin Marinas" <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
"Linux-sh list" <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
"Chen Gang" <gang.chen@asianux.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
"paulus@samba.org" <paulus@samba.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Michel Lespinasse" <walken@google.com>,
"Hans-Christian Egtvedt" <egtvedt@samfundet.no>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
"Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"Yoshinori Sato" <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
"Helge Deller" <deller@gmx.de>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
"Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"Paul McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Håvard Skinnemoen" <hskinnemoen@gmail.com>,
"Serge Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>,
"Mike Frysinger" <vapier@gentoo.org>,
uml-devel <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"Jeff Dike" <jdike@addtoit.com>,
"Akinobu Mita" <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>,
uml-user <user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net>,
"uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org"
<uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"Parisc List" <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Richard Kuo" <rkuo@codeaurora.org>,
"Paul Mundt" <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin Schwidefsky" <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
linux390@de.ibm.com, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: configuration, deleting 'CONFIG_BUG' since always need it.
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 03:09:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878v369fdd.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201305231139.38233.arnd@arndb.de> (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Thu, 23 May 2013 11:39:37 +0200")
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:
> On Thursday 23 May 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > The problem is: trying to fix that will mean the result is a larger
>> > kernel than if you just do the usual arch-implemented thing of placing
>> > an defined faulting instruction at the BUG() site - which defeats the
>> > purpose of turning off CONFIG_BUG.
>>
>> Is __builtin_unreachable() working well these days?
>>
>
> Hmm, I just tried the trivial patch below, which seemed to do the right thing.
> Needs a little more investigation, but that might actually be the correct
> solution. I thought that at some point __builtin_unreachable() was the same
> as "do {} while (1)", but this is not the case with the gcc I was using --
> it just tells gcc that we don't expect to ever get here.
Yes.
We already have this abstracted in compiler.h as the macro unreachable,
so the slight modification of your patch below should handle this case.
For compilers without __builtin_unreachable() unreachable() expands to
do {} while(1) but an infinite loop seems reasonable and preserves the
semantics of the code, unlike the current noop that is do {} while(0).
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bug.h b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
index 7d10f96..9afff7d 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/bug.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
@@ -108,11 +108,11 @@ extern void warn_slowpath_null(const char *file, const int line);
#else /* !CONFIG_BUG */
#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
-#define BUG() do {} while(0)
+#define BUG() unreachable ()
#endif
#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG_ON
-#define BUG_ON(condition) do { if (condition) ; } while(0)
+#define BUG_ON(condition) do { if (condition) unreachable(); } while(0)
#endif
#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_WARN_ON
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arch: configuration, deleting 'CONFIG_BUG' since always need it.
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 03:09:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878v369fdd.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201305231139.38233.arnd@arndb.de> (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Thu, 23 May 2013 11:39:37 +0200")
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:
> On Thursday 23 May 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > The problem is: trying to fix that will mean the result is a larger
>> > kernel than if you just do the usual arch-implemented thing of placing
>> > an defined faulting instruction at the BUG() site - which defeats the
>> > purpose of turning off CONFIG_BUG.
>>
>> Is __builtin_unreachable() working well these days?
>>
>
> Hmm, I just tried the trivial patch below, which seemed to do the right thing.
> Needs a little more investigation, but that might actually be the correct
> solution. I thought that at some point __builtin_unreachable() was the same
> as "do {} while (1)", but this is not the case with the gcc I was using --
> it just tells gcc that we don't expect to ever get here.
Yes.
We already have this abstracted in compiler.h as the macro unreachable,
so the slight modification of your patch below should handle this case.
For compilers without __builtin_unreachable() unreachable() expands to
do {} while(1) but an infinite loop seems reasonable and preserves the
semantics of the code, unlike the current noop that is do {} while(0).
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bug.h b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
index 7d10f96..9afff7d 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/bug.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
@@ -108,11 +108,11 @@ extern void warn_slowpath_null(const char *file, const int line);
#else /* !CONFIG_BUG */
#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG
-#define BUG() do {} while(0)
+#define BUG() unreachable ()
#endif
#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_BUG_ON
-#define BUG_ON(condition) do { if (condition) ; } while(0)
+#define BUG_ON(condition) do { if (condition) unreachable(); } while(0)
#endif
#ifndef HAVE_ARCH_WARN_ON
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-23 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 127+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-23 7:57 [PATCH] arch: configuration, deleting 'CONFIG_BUG' since always need it Chen Gang
2013-05-23 7:57 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-23 7:57 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-23 7:57 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-23 7:57 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-23 7:57 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-23 8:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-05-23 8:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-05-23 8:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-05-23 8:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-05-23 8:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-23 8:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-23 8:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-23 8:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <CAMuHMdU7QuzgmWCH145p8PVebBzPo8DBAvbY+0AZa2cmGXmRHw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-23 9:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-23 9:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-23 9:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-23 9:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-23 9:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-23 9:12 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-05-23 9:12 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-05-23 9:12 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-05-23 9:12 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-05-23 9:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-23 9:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-23 9:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-23 9:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <201305231139.38233.arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-23 10:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-23 10:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-23 10:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-23 10:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-23 10:41 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-23 10:41 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-23 10:41 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-23 10:41 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-23 10:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-23 10:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-23 10:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-23 10:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <201305231259.43750.arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-23 11:19 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-23 11:19 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-23 11:19 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-23 11:19 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-23 11:19 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-23 11:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-23 11:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-23 11:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-23 11:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
[not found] ` <20130523112401.GO18614-l+eeeJia6m9vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-23 12:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-23 12:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-23 12:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-23 12:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-23 12:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-23 12:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-23 12:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-23 12:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-23 14:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-05-23 14:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-05-23 14:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-05-23 14:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-05-24 2:13 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-24 2:13 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-24 2:13 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-24 2:13 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-24 4:17 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-24 4:17 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-24 4:17 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-24 4:17 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-26 4:43 ` [PATCH v2] arch: configuration issue, random return value when disable 'CONFIG_BUG' Chen Gang
2013-05-26 4:43 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-26 4:43 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-26 4:43 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-28 8:19 ` [PATCH] arch: configuration, deleting 'CONFIG_BUG' since always need it Ingo Molnar
2013-05-28 8:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-28 8:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-28 8:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-28 8:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-28 8:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-28 8:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-28 10:25 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-28 10:25 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-28 10:25 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-28 10:25 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-28 10:25 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-28 14:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-28 14:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-28 14:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-28 14:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-28 14:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <20130528081910.GA29557-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-28 14:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-05-28 14:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-05-28 14:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-05-28 14:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-05-28 14:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-05-28 15:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-28 15:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-28 15:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-28 15:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-28 15:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <201305281743.52649.arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-28 16:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-05-28 16:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-05-28 16:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-05-28 16:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-05-28 16:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
[not found] ` <51A4D618.3080208-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-28 17:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-28 17:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-28 17:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-28 17:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-28 17:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-23 10:09 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2013-05-23 10:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-05-23 10:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-05-23 10:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <878v369fdd.fsf-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2013-05-23 10:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-23 10:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-23 10:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-23 10:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-23 10:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-23 10:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-23 10:05 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-23 10:05 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-23 10:05 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-23 10:05 ` Chen Gang
2013-05-24 5:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-05-24 5:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-05-24 5:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-05-24 5:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878v369fdd.fsf@xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=egtvedt@samfundet.no \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gang.chen@asianux.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=walken@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.