From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
KVMARM <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] KVM: selftests: Add vgic initialization for dirty log perf test for ARM
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 10:30:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a6g2tvia.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220110210441.2074798-4-jingzhangos@google.com>
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 21:04:41 +0000,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com> wrote:
>
> For ARM64, if no vgic is setup before the dirty log perf test, the
> userspace irqchip would be used, which would affect the dirty log perf
> test result.
Doesn't it affect *all* performance tests? How much does this change
contributes to the performance numbers you give in the cover letter?
>
> Signed-off-by: Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c
> index 1954b964d1cf..b501338d9430 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,12 @@
> #include "test_util.h"
> #include "perf_test_util.h"
> #include "guest_modes.h"
> +#ifdef __aarch64__
> +#include "aarch64/vgic.h"
> +
> +#define GICD_BASE_GPA 0x8000000ULL
> +#define GICR_BASE_GPA 0x80A0000ULL
How did you pick these values?
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, KVMARM <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] KVM: selftests: Add vgic initialization for dirty log perf test for ARM
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 10:30:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a6g2tvia.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220110210441.2074798-4-jingzhangos@google.com>
On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 21:04:41 +0000,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com> wrote:
>
> For ARM64, if no vgic is setup before the dirty log perf test, the
> userspace irqchip would be used, which would affect the dirty log perf
> test result.
Doesn't it affect *all* performance tests? How much does this change
contributes to the performance numbers you give in the cover letter?
>
> Signed-off-by: Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c
> index 1954b964d1cf..b501338d9430 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,12 @@
> #include "test_util.h"
> #include "perf_test_util.h"
> #include "guest_modes.h"
> +#ifdef __aarch64__
> +#include "aarch64/vgic.h"
> +
> +#define GICD_BASE_GPA 0x8000000ULL
> +#define GICR_BASE_GPA 0x80A0000ULL
How did you pick these values?
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-11 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-10 21:04 [RFC PATCH 0/3] ARM64: Guest performance improvement during dirty Jing Zhang
2022-01-10 21:04 ` Jing Zhang
2022-01-10 21:04 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] KVM: arm64: Use read/write spin lock for MMU protection Jing Zhang
2022-01-10 21:04 ` Jing Zhang
2022-01-11 10:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-11 10:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-11 22:12 ` Jing Zhang
2022-01-11 22:12 ` Jing Zhang
2022-01-10 21:04 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] KVM: arm64: Add fast path to handle permission relaxation during dirty logging Jing Zhang
2022-01-10 21:04 ` Jing Zhang
2022-01-11 10:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-11 10:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-11 10:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-11 10:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-11 22:12 ` Jing Zhang
2022-01-11 22:12 ` Jing Zhang
2022-01-10 21:04 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] KVM: selftests: Add vgic initialization for dirty log perf test for ARM Jing Zhang
2022-01-10 21:04 ` Jing Zhang
2022-01-11 9:55 ` Andrew Jones
2022-01-11 9:55 ` Andrew Jones
2022-01-11 22:12 ` Jing Zhang
2022-01-11 22:12 ` Jing Zhang
2022-01-11 10:30 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2022-01-11 10:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-11 22:16 ` Jing Zhang
2022-01-11 22:16 ` Jing Zhang
2022-01-12 11:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-12 11:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-12 17:40 ` Jing Zhang
2022-01-12 17:40 ` Jing Zhang
2022-01-11 11:54 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] ARM64: Guest performance improvement during dirty Marc Zyngier
2022-01-11 11:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-01-11 22:12 ` Jing Zhang
2022-01-11 22:12 ` Jing Zhang
2022-01-13 2:49 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-13 2:49 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-13 3:50 ` Jing Zhang
2022-01-13 3:50 ` Jing Zhang
2022-01-13 6:12 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-13 6:12 ` Ricardo Koller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a6g2tvia.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.