[PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: PPC: MMIO fixes

[PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: PPC: MMIO fixes

[Fabiano Rosas]

The change from v1 is that I have altered the MMIO size check to fail
the emulation in case the size exceeds 8 bytes. That brought some
cleanups and another fix along with it, we were returning to userspace
in case of failure instead of the guest.

This has now become an MMIO series, but since the first commit has
been reviewed already, I'm leaving it here.

v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211223211528.3560711-1-farosas@linux.ibm.com

Fabiano Rosas (7):
  KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Stop returning internal values to userspace
  KVM: PPC: Fix vmx/vsx mixup in mmio emulation
  KVM: PPC: Fix mmio length message
  KVM: PPC: Don't use pr_emerg when mmio emulation fails
  KVM: PPC: mmio: Queue interrupt at kvmppc_emulate_mmio
  KVM: PPC: mmio: Return to guest after emulation failure
  KVM: PPC: mmio: Reject instructions that access more than mmio.data
    size

 arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate_loadstore.c |  4 +---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c           | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

-- 
2.33.1

[PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: PPC: MMIO fixes

[Fabiano Rosas]

The change from v1 is that I have altered the MMIO size check to fail
the emulation in case the size exceeds 8 bytes. That brought some
cleanups and another fix along with it, we were returning to userspace
in case of failure instead of the guest.

This has now become an MMIO series, but since the first commit has
been reviewed already, I'm leaving it here.

v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211223211528.3560711-1-farosas@linux.ibm.com

Fabiano Rosas (7):
  KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Stop returning internal values to userspace
  KVM: PPC: Fix vmx/vsx mixup in mmio emulation
  KVM: PPC: Fix mmio length message
  KVM: PPC: Don't use pr_emerg when mmio emulation fails
  KVM: PPC: mmio: Queue interrupt at kvmppc_emulate_mmio
  KVM: PPC: mmio: Return to guest after emulation failure
  KVM: PPC: mmio: Reject instructions that access more than mmio.data
    size

 arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate_loadstore.c |  4 +---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c           | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

-- 
2.33.1

[PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Stop returning internal values to userspace

[Fabiano Rosas]

Our kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run currently returns the RESUME_HOST values
to userspace, against the API of the KVM_RUN ioctl which returns 0 on
success.

Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
---
This was noticed while enabling the kvm selftests for powerpc. There's
an assert at the _vcpu_run function when we return a value different
from the expected.
---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
index a72920f4f221..1e130bb087c4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
@@ -1849,6 +1849,14 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 #ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC
 out:
 #endif
+
+	/*
+	 * We're already returning to userspace, don't pass the
+	 * RESUME_HOST flags along.
+	 */
+	if (r > 0)
+		r = 0;
+
 	vcpu_put(vcpu);
 	return r;
 }
-- 
2.33.1

[PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Stop returning internal values to userspace

[Fabiano Rosas]

Our kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run currently returns the RESUME_HOST values
to userspace, against the API of the KVM_RUN ioctl which returns 0 on
success.

Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
---
This was noticed while enabling the kvm selftests for powerpc. There's
an assert at the _vcpu_run function when we return a value different
from the expected.
---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
index a72920f4f221..1e130bb087c4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
@@ -1849,6 +1849,14 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 #ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC
 out:
 #endif
+
+	/*
+	 * We're already returning to userspace, don't pass the
+	 * RESUME_HOST flags along.
+	 */
+	if (r > 0)
+		r = 0;
+
 	vcpu_put(vcpu);
 	return r;
 }
-- 
2.33.1

[PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: PPC: Fix vmx/vsx mixup in mmio emulation

[Fabiano Rosas]

The MMIO emulation code for vector instructions is duplicated between
VSX and VMX. When emulating VMX we should check the VMX copy size
instead of the VSX one.

Fixes: acc9eb9305fe ("KVM: PPC: Reimplement LOAD_VMX/STORE_VMX instruction ...")
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
index 1e130bb087c4..92e552ab5a77 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ int kvmppc_handle_vmx_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 {
 	enum emulation_result emulated = EMULATE_DONE;
 
-	if (vcpu->arch.mmio_vsx_copy_nums > 2)
+	if (vcpu->arch.mmio_vmx_copy_nums > 2)
 		return EMULATE_FAIL;
 
 	while (vcpu->arch.mmio_vmx_copy_nums) {
@@ -1604,7 +1604,7 @@ int kvmppc_handle_vmx_store(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	unsigned int index = rs & KVM_MMIO_REG_MASK;
 	enum emulation_result emulated = EMULATE_DONE;
 
-	if (vcpu->arch.mmio_vsx_copy_nums > 2)
+	if (vcpu->arch.mmio_vmx_copy_nums > 2)
 		return EMULATE_FAIL;
 
 	vcpu->arch.io_gpr = rs;
-- 
2.33.1

[PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: PPC: Fix vmx/vsx mixup in mmio emulation

[Fabiano Rosas]

The MMIO emulation code for vector instructions is duplicated between
VSX and VMX. When emulating VMX we should check the VMX copy size
instead of the VSX one.

Fixes: acc9eb9305fe ("KVM: PPC: Reimplement LOAD_VMX/STORE_VMX instruction ...")
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
index 1e130bb087c4..92e552ab5a77 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ int kvmppc_handle_vmx_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 {
 	enum emulation_result emulated = EMULATE_DONE;
 
-	if (vcpu->arch.mmio_vsx_copy_nums > 2)
+	if (vcpu->arch.mmio_vmx_copy_nums > 2)
 		return EMULATE_FAIL;
 
 	while (vcpu->arch.mmio_vmx_copy_nums) {
@@ -1604,7 +1604,7 @@ int kvmppc_handle_vmx_store(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	unsigned int index = rs & KVM_MMIO_REG_MASK;
 	enum emulation_result emulated = EMULATE_DONE;
 
-	if (vcpu->arch.mmio_vsx_copy_nums > 2)
+	if (vcpu->arch.mmio_vmx_copy_nums > 2)
 		return EMULATE_FAIL;
 
 	vcpu->arch.io_gpr = rs;
-- 
2.33.1

[PATCH v2 3/7] KVM: PPC: Fix mmio length message

[Fabiano Rosas]

We check against 'bytes' but print 'run->mmio.len' which at that point
has an old value.

e.g. 16-byte load:

before:
__kvmppc_handle_load: bad MMIO length: 8

now:
__kvmppc_handle_load: bad MMIO length: 16

Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
index 92e552ab5a77..0b0818d032e1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
@@ -1246,7 +1246,7 @@ static int __kvmppc_handle_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 
 	if (bytes > sizeof(run->mmio.data)) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bad MMIO length: %d\n", __func__,
-		       run->mmio.len);
+		       bytes);
 	}
 
 	run->mmio.phys_addr = vcpu->arch.paddr_accessed;
@@ -1335,7 +1335,7 @@ int kvmppc_handle_store(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 
 	if (bytes > sizeof(run->mmio.data)) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bad MMIO length: %d\n", __func__,
-		       run->mmio.len);
+		       bytes);
 	}
 
 	run->mmio.phys_addr = vcpu->arch.paddr_accessed;
-- 
2.33.1

[PATCH v2 3/7] KVM: PPC: Fix mmio length message

[Fabiano Rosas]

We check against 'bytes' but print 'run->mmio.len' which at that point
has an old value.

e.g. 16-byte load:

before:
__kvmppc_handle_load: bad MMIO length: 8

now:
__kvmppc_handle_load: bad MMIO length: 16

Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
index 92e552ab5a77..0b0818d032e1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
@@ -1246,7 +1246,7 @@ static int __kvmppc_handle_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 
 	if (bytes > sizeof(run->mmio.data)) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bad MMIO length: %d\n", __func__,
-		       run->mmio.len);
+		       bytes);
 	}
 
 	run->mmio.phys_addr = vcpu->arch.paddr_accessed;
@@ -1335,7 +1335,7 @@ int kvmppc_handle_store(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 
 	if (bytes > sizeof(run->mmio.data)) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bad MMIO length: %d\n", __func__,
-		       run->mmio.len);
+		       bytes);
 	}
 
 	run->mmio.phys_addr = vcpu->arch.paddr_accessed;
-- 
2.33.1

Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] KVM: PPC: Fix mmio length message

[Alexey Kardashevskiy]

On 07/01/2022 07:03, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> We check against 'bytes' but print 'run->mmio.len' which at that point
> has an old value.
> 
> e.g. 16-byte load:
> 
> before:
> __kvmppc_handle_load: bad MMIO length: 8
> 
> now:
> __kvmppc_handle_load: bad MMIO length: 16
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> index 92e552ab5a77..0b0818d032e1 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> @@ -1246,7 +1246,7 @@ static int __kvmppc_handle_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>   
>   	if (bytes > sizeof(run->mmio.data)) {
>   		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bad MMIO length: %d\n", __func__,
> -		       run->mmio.len);
> +		       bytes);


"return EMULATE_FAIL;" here and below as there is really no point in 
trashing kvm_run::mmio (not much harm too but still) and this code does 
not handle more than 8 bytes anyway.



>   	}
>   
>   	run->mmio.phys_addr = vcpu->arch.paddr_accessed;
> @@ -1335,7 +1335,7 @@ int kvmppc_handle_store(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>   
>   	if (bytes > sizeof(run->mmio.data)) {
>   		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bad MMIO length: %d\n", __func__,
> -		       run->mmio.len);
> +		       bytes);
>   	}
>   
>   	run->mmio.phys_addr = vcpu->arch.paddr_accessed;

-- 
Alexey

Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] KVM: PPC: Fix mmio length message

[Alexey Kardashevskiy]

On 07/01/2022 07:03, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> We check against 'bytes' but print 'run->mmio.len' which at that point
> has an old value.
> 
> e.g. 16-byte load:
> 
> before:
> __kvmppc_handle_load: bad MMIO length: 8
> 
> now:
> __kvmppc_handle_load: bad MMIO length: 16
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> index 92e552ab5a77..0b0818d032e1 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> @@ -1246,7 +1246,7 @@ static int __kvmppc_handle_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>   
>   	if (bytes > sizeof(run->mmio.data)) {
>   		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bad MMIO length: %d\n", __func__,
> -		       run->mmio.len);
> +		       bytes);


"return EMULATE_FAIL;" here and below as there is really no point in 
trashing kvm_run::mmio (not much harm too but still) and this code does 
not handle more than 8 bytes anyway.



>   	}
>   
>   	run->mmio.phys_addr = vcpu->arch.paddr_accessed;
> @@ -1335,7 +1335,7 @@ int kvmppc_handle_store(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>   
>   	if (bytes > sizeof(run->mmio.data)) {
>   		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bad MMIO length: %d\n", __func__,
> -		       run->mmio.len);
> +		       bytes);
>   	}
>   
>   	run->mmio.phys_addr = vcpu->arch.paddr_accessed;

-- 
Alexey

[PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: PPC: Don't use pr_emerg when mmio emulation fails

[Fabiano Rosas]

If MMIO emulation fails we deliver a Program interrupt to the
guest. This is a normal event for the host, so use pr_info.

Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
index 0b0818d032e1..3fc8057db4b4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ int kvmppc_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 		kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &last_inst);
 		/* XXX Deliver Program interrupt to guest. */
-		pr_emerg("%s: emulation failed (%08x)\n", __func__, last_inst);
+		pr_info("%s: emulation failed (%08x)\n", __func__, last_inst);
 		r = RESUME_HOST;
 		break;
 	}
-- 
2.33.1

[PATCH v2 4/7] KVM: PPC: Don't use pr_emerg when mmio emulation fails

[Fabiano Rosas]

If MMIO emulation fails we deliver a Program interrupt to the
guest. This is a normal event for the host, so use pr_info.

Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
index 0b0818d032e1..3fc8057db4b4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ int kvmppc_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 		kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &last_inst);
 		/* XXX Deliver Program interrupt to guest. */
-		pr_emerg("%s: emulation failed (%08x)\n", __func__, last_inst);
+		pr_info("%s: emulation failed (%08x)\n", __func__, last_inst);
 		r = RESUME_HOST;
 		break;
 	}
-- 
2.33.1

[PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: PPC: mmio: Queue interrupt at kvmppc_emulate_mmio

[Fabiano Rosas]

If MMIO emulation fails, we queue a Program interrupt to the
guest. Move that line up into kvmppc_emulate_mmio, which is where we
set RESUME_GUEST/HOST.

No functional change, just separation of responsibilities.

Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate_loadstore.c | 4 +---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c           | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate_loadstore.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate_loadstore.c
index 48272a9b9c30..ef50e8cfd988 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate_loadstore.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate_loadstore.c
@@ -355,10 +355,8 @@ int kvmppc_emulate_loadstore(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (emulated = EMULATE_FAIL) {
+	if (emulated = EMULATE_FAIL)
 		advance = 0;
-		kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, 0);
-	}
 
 	trace_kvm_ppc_instr(inst, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu), emulated);
 
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
index 3fc8057db4b4..a2e78229d645 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ int kvmppc_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		u32 last_inst;
 
 		kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &last_inst);
-		/* XXX Deliver Program interrupt to guest. */
+		kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, 0);
 		pr_info("%s: emulation failed (%08x)\n", __func__, last_inst);
 		r = RESUME_HOST;
 		break;
-- 
2.33.1

[PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: PPC: mmio: Queue interrupt at kvmppc_emulate_mmio

[Fabiano Rosas]

If MMIO emulation fails, we queue a Program interrupt to the
guest. Move that line up into kvmppc_emulate_mmio, which is where we
set RESUME_GUEST/HOST.

No functional change, just separation of responsibilities.

Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate_loadstore.c | 4 +---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c           | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate_loadstore.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate_loadstore.c
index 48272a9b9c30..ef50e8cfd988 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate_loadstore.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate_loadstore.c
@@ -355,10 +355,8 @@ int kvmppc_emulate_loadstore(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (emulated == EMULATE_FAIL) {
+	if (emulated == EMULATE_FAIL)
 		advance = 0;
-		kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, 0);
-	}
 
 	trace_kvm_ppc_instr(inst, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu), emulated);
 
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
index 3fc8057db4b4..a2e78229d645 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ int kvmppc_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		u32 last_inst;
 
 		kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &last_inst);
-		/* XXX Deliver Program interrupt to guest. */
+		kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, 0);
 		pr_info("%s: emulation failed (%08x)\n", __func__, last_inst);
 		r = RESUME_HOST;
 		break;
-- 
2.33.1

Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: PPC: mmio: Queue interrupt at kvmppc_emulate_mmio

[Alexey Kardashevskiy]

On 07/01/2022 07:03, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> If MMIO emulation fails, we queue a Program interrupt to the
> guest. Move that line up into kvmppc_emulate_mmio, which is where we
> set RESUME_GUEST/HOST.
> 
> No functional change, just separation of responsibilities.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate_loadstore.c | 4 +---
>   arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c           | 2 +-
>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate_loadstore.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate_loadstore.c
> index 48272a9b9c30..ef50e8cfd988 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate_loadstore.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate_loadstore.c
> @@ -355,10 +355,8 @@ int kvmppc_emulate_loadstore(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> -	if (emulated = EMULATE_FAIL) {
> +	if (emulated = EMULATE_FAIL)
>   		advance = 0;


You can now drop @advance by moving the "if" few lines down.


> -		kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, 0);
> -	}
>   
>   	trace_kvm_ppc_instr(inst, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu), emulated);
>   
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> index 3fc8057db4b4..a2e78229d645 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ int kvmppc_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   		u32 last_inst;
>   
>   		kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &last_inst);
> -		/* XXX Deliver Program interrupt to guest. */
> +		kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, 0);
>   		pr_info("%s: emulation failed (%08x)\n", __func__, last_inst);
>   		r = RESUME_HOST;
>   		break;

-- 
Alexey

Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] KVM: PPC: mmio: Queue interrupt at kvmppc_emulate_mmio

[Alexey Kardashevskiy]

On 07/01/2022 07:03, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> If MMIO emulation fails, we queue a Program interrupt to the
> guest. Move that line up into kvmppc_emulate_mmio, which is where we
> set RESUME_GUEST/HOST.
> 
> No functional change, just separation of responsibilities.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate_loadstore.c | 4 +---
>   arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c           | 2 +-
>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate_loadstore.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate_loadstore.c
> index 48272a9b9c30..ef50e8cfd988 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate_loadstore.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate_loadstore.c
> @@ -355,10 +355,8 @@ int kvmppc_emulate_loadstore(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> -	if (emulated == EMULATE_FAIL) {
> +	if (emulated == EMULATE_FAIL)
>   		advance = 0;


You can now drop @advance by moving the "if" few lines down.


> -		kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, 0);
> -	}
>   
>   	trace_kvm_ppc_instr(inst, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu), emulated);
>   
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> index 3fc8057db4b4..a2e78229d645 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ int kvmppc_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   		u32 last_inst;
>   
>   		kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &last_inst);
> -		/* XXX Deliver Program interrupt to guest. */
> +		kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, 0);
>   		pr_info("%s: emulation failed (%08x)\n", __func__, last_inst);
>   		r = RESUME_HOST;
>   		break;

-- 
Alexey

[PATCH v2 6/7] KVM: PPC: mmio: Return to guest after emulation failure

[Fabiano Rosas]

If MMIO emulation fails we don't want to crash the whole guest by
returning to userspace.

The original commit bbf45ba57eae ("KVM: ppc: PowerPC 440 KVM
implementation") added a todo:

  /* XXX Deliver Program interrupt to guest. */

and later the commit d69614a295ae ("KVM: PPC: Separate loadstore
emulation from priv emulation") added the Program interrupt injection
but in another file, so I'm assuming it was missed that this block
needed to be altered.

Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
index a2e78229d645..50e08635e18a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ int kvmppc_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &last_inst);
 		kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, 0);
 		pr_info("%s: emulation failed (%08x)\n", __func__, last_inst);
-		r = RESUME_HOST;
+		r = RESUME_GUEST;
 		break;
 	}
 	default:
-- 
2.33.1

[PATCH v2 6/7] KVM: PPC: mmio: Return to guest after emulation failure

[Fabiano Rosas]

If MMIO emulation fails we don't want to crash the whole guest by
returning to userspace.

The original commit bbf45ba57eae ("KVM: ppc: PowerPC 440 KVM
implementation") added a todo:

  /* XXX Deliver Program interrupt to guest. */

and later the commit d69614a295ae ("KVM: PPC: Separate loadstore
emulation from priv emulation") added the Program interrupt injection
but in another file, so I'm assuming it was missed that this block
needed to be altered.

Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
index a2e78229d645..50e08635e18a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ int kvmppc_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &last_inst);
 		kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, 0);
 		pr_info("%s: emulation failed (%08x)\n", __func__, last_inst);
-		r = RESUME_HOST;
+		r = RESUME_GUEST;
 		break;
 	}
 	default:
-- 
2.33.1

Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] KVM: PPC: mmio: Return to guest after emulation failure

[Alexey Kardashevskiy]

On 07/01/2022 07:03, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> If MMIO emulation fails we don't want to crash the whole guest by
> returning to userspace.
> 
> The original commit bbf45ba57eae ("KVM: ppc: PowerPC 440 KVM
> implementation") added a todo:
> 
>    /* XXX Deliver Program interrupt to guest. */
> 
> and later the commit d69614a295ae ("KVM: PPC: Separate loadstore
> emulation from priv emulation") added the Program interrupt injection
> but in another file, so I'm assuming it was missed that this block
> needed to be altered.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>


Looks right.
Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>

but this means if I want to keep debugging those kvm selftests in 
comfort, I'll have to have some exception handlers in the vm as 
otherwise the failing $pc is lost after this change :)

> ---
>   arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> index a2e78229d645..50e08635e18a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ int kvmppc_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   		kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &last_inst);
>   		kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, 0);
>   		pr_info("%s: emulation failed (%08x)\n", __func__, last_inst);
> -		r = RESUME_HOST;
> +		r = RESUME_GUEST;
>   		break;
>   	}
>   	default:

-- 
Alexey

Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] KVM: PPC: mmio: Return to guest after emulation failure

[Alexey Kardashevskiy]

On 07/01/2022 07:03, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> If MMIO emulation fails we don't want to crash the whole guest by
> returning to userspace.
> 
> The original commit bbf45ba57eae ("KVM: ppc: PowerPC 440 KVM
> implementation") added a todo:
> 
>    /* XXX Deliver Program interrupt to guest. */
> 
> and later the commit d69614a295ae ("KVM: PPC: Separate loadstore
> emulation from priv emulation") added the Program interrupt injection
> but in another file, so I'm assuming it was missed that this block
> needed to be altered.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>


Looks right.
Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>

but this means if I want to keep debugging those kvm selftests in 
comfort, I'll have to have some exception handlers in the vm as 
otherwise the failing $pc is lost after this change :)

> ---
>   arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> index a2e78229d645..50e08635e18a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ int kvmppc_emulate_mmio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>   		kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu, INST_GENERIC, &last_inst);
>   		kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, 0);
>   		pr_info("%s: emulation failed (%08x)\n", __func__, last_inst);
> -		r = RESUME_HOST;
> +		r = RESUME_GUEST;
>   		break;
>   	}
>   	default:

-- 
Alexey

Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] KVM: PPC: mmio: Return to guest after emulation failure

[Fabiano Rosas]

Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> writes:

> On 07/01/2022 07:03, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> If MMIO emulation fails we don't want to crash the whole guest by
>> returning to userspace.
>> 
>> The original commit bbf45ba57eae ("KVM: ppc: PowerPC 440 KVM
>> implementation") added a todo:
>> 
>>    /* XXX Deliver Program interrupt to guest. */
>> 
>> and later the commit d69614a295ae ("KVM: PPC: Separate loadstore
>> emulation from priv emulation") added the Program interrupt injection
>> but in another file, so I'm assuming it was missed that this block
>> needed to be altered.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
>
>
> Looks right.
> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
>
> but this means if I want to keep debugging those kvm selftests in 
> comfort, I'll have to have some exception handlers in the vm as 
> otherwise the failing $pc is lost after this change :)

Yes! But that will be a problem for any test. These kinds of issues is
why I wanted a trial period before sending the test infrastructure
upstream. Maybe we don't need exception handlers, but just a way to
force the test to crash if it tries to fetch from 0x700.

Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] KVM: PPC: mmio: Return to guest after emulation failure

[Fabiano Rosas]

Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru> writes:

> On 07/01/2022 07:03, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
>> If MMIO emulation fails we don't want to crash the whole guest by
>> returning to userspace.
>> 
>> The original commit bbf45ba57eae ("KVM: ppc: PowerPC 440 KVM
>> implementation") added a todo:
>> 
>>    /* XXX Deliver Program interrupt to guest. */
>> 
>> and later the commit d69614a295ae ("KVM: PPC: Separate loadstore
>> emulation from priv emulation") added the Program interrupt injection
>> but in another file, so I'm assuming it was missed that this block
>> needed to be altered.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
>
>
> Looks right.
> Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
>
> but this means if I want to keep debugging those kvm selftests in 
> comfort, I'll have to have some exception handlers in the vm as 
> otherwise the failing $pc is lost after this change :)

Yes! But that will be a problem for any test. These kinds of issues is
why I wanted a trial period before sending the test infrastructure
upstream. Maybe we don't need exception handlers, but just a way to
force the test to crash if it tries to fetch from 0x700.

[PATCH v2 7/7] KVM: PPC: mmio: Reject instructions that access more than mmio.data size

[Fabiano Rosas]

The MMIO interface between the kernel and userspace uses a structure
that supports a maximum of 8-bytes of data. Instructions that access
more than that need to be emulated in parts.

We currently don't have generic support for splitting the emulation in
parts and each set of instructions needs to be explicitly included.

There's already an error message being printed when a load or store
exceeds the mmio.data buffer but we don't fail the emulation until
later at kvmppc_complete_mmio_load and even then we allow userspace to
make a partial copy of the data, which ends up overwriting some fields
of the mmio structure.

This patch makes the emulation fail earlier at kvmppc_handle_load|store,
which will send a Program interrupt to the guest. This is better than
allowing the guest to proceed with partial data.

Note that this was caught in a somewhat artificial scenario using
quadword instructions (lq/stq), there's no account of an actual guest
in the wild running instructions that are not properly emulated.

Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
index 50e08635e18a..a1643ca988e0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
@@ -1247,6 +1247,7 @@ static int __kvmppc_handle_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	if (bytes > sizeof(run->mmio.data)) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bad MMIO length: %d\n", __func__,
 		       bytes);
+		return EMULATE_FAIL;
 	}
 
 	run->mmio.phys_addr = vcpu->arch.paddr_accessed;
@@ -1336,6 +1337,7 @@ int kvmppc_handle_store(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	if (bytes > sizeof(run->mmio.data)) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bad MMIO length: %d\n", __func__,
 		       bytes);
+		return EMULATE_FAIL;
 	}
 
 	run->mmio.phys_addr = vcpu->arch.paddr_accessed;
-- 
2.33.1

[PATCH v2 7/7] KVM: PPC: mmio: Reject instructions that access more than mmio.data size

[Fabiano Rosas]

The MMIO interface between the kernel and userspace uses a structure
that supports a maximum of 8-bytes of data. Instructions that access
more than that need to be emulated in parts.

We currently don't have generic support for splitting the emulation in
parts and each set of instructions needs to be explicitly included.

There's already an error message being printed when a load or store
exceeds the mmio.data buffer but we don't fail the emulation until
later at kvmppc_complete_mmio_load and even then we allow userspace to
make a partial copy of the data, which ends up overwriting some fields
of the mmio structure.

This patch makes the emulation fail earlier at kvmppc_handle_load|store,
which will send a Program interrupt to the guest. This is better than
allowing the guest to proceed with partial data.

Note that this was caught in a somewhat artificial scenario using
quadword instructions (lq/stq), there's no account of an actual guest
in the wild running instructions that are not properly emulated.

Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
index 50e08635e18a..a1643ca988e0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
@@ -1247,6 +1247,7 @@ static int __kvmppc_handle_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	if (bytes > sizeof(run->mmio.data)) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bad MMIO length: %d\n", __func__,
 		       bytes);
+		return EMULATE_FAIL;
 	}
 
 	run->mmio.phys_addr = vcpu->arch.paddr_accessed;
@@ -1336,6 +1337,7 @@ int kvmppc_handle_store(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	if (bytes > sizeof(run->mmio.data)) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bad MMIO length: %d\n", __func__,
 		       bytes);
+		return EMULATE_FAIL;
 	}
 
 	run->mmio.phys_addr = vcpu->arch.paddr_accessed;
-- 
2.33.1

Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] KVM: PPC: mmio: Reject instructions that access more than mmio.data size

[Alexey Kardashevskiy]

On 07/01/2022 07:03, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> The MMIO interface between the kernel and userspace uses a structure
> that supports a maximum of 8-bytes of data. Instructions that access
> more than that need to be emulated in parts.
> 
> We currently don't have generic support for splitting the emulation in
> parts and each set of instructions needs to be explicitly included.
> 
> There's already an error message being printed when a load or store
> exceeds the mmio.data buffer but we don't fail the emulation until
> later at kvmppc_complete_mmio_load and even then we allow userspace to
> make a partial copy of the data, which ends up overwriting some fields
> of the mmio structure.
> 
> This patch makes the emulation fail earlier at kvmppc_handle_load|store,
> which will send a Program interrupt to the guest. This is better than
> allowing the guest to proceed with partial data.
> 
> Note that this was caught in a somewhat artificial scenario using
> quadword instructions (lq/stq), there's no account of an actual guest
> in the wild running instructions that are not properly emulated.



Ah thereee it is :-)
I'd merge it into 3/7.

anyway,
Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>


> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> index 50e08635e18a..a1643ca988e0 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> @@ -1247,6 +1247,7 @@ static int __kvmppc_handle_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>   	if (bytes > sizeof(run->mmio.data)) {
>   		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bad MMIO length: %d\n", __func__,
>   		       bytes);
> +		return EMULATE_FAIL;
>   	}
>   
>   	run->mmio.phys_addr = vcpu->arch.paddr_accessed;
> @@ -1336,6 +1337,7 @@ int kvmppc_handle_store(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>   	if (bytes > sizeof(run->mmio.data)) {
>   		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bad MMIO length: %d\n", __func__,
>   		       bytes);
> +		return EMULATE_FAIL;
>   	}
>   
>   	run->mmio.phys_addr = vcpu->arch.paddr_accessed;

-- 
Alexey

Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] KVM: PPC: mmio: Reject instructions that access more than mmio.data size

[Alexey Kardashevskiy]

On 07/01/2022 07:03, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
> The MMIO interface between the kernel and userspace uses a structure
> that supports a maximum of 8-bytes of data. Instructions that access
> more than that need to be emulated in parts.
> 
> We currently don't have generic support for splitting the emulation in
> parts and each set of instructions needs to be explicitly included.
> 
> There's already an error message being printed when a load or store
> exceeds the mmio.data buffer but we don't fail the emulation until
> later at kvmppc_complete_mmio_load and even then we allow userspace to
> make a partial copy of the data, which ends up overwriting some fields
> of the mmio structure.
> 
> This patch makes the emulation fail earlier at kvmppc_handle_load|store,
> which will send a Program interrupt to the guest. This is better than
> allowing the guest to proceed with partial data.
> 
> Note that this was caught in a somewhat artificial scenario using
> quadword instructions (lq/stq), there's no account of an actual guest
> in the wild running instructions that are not properly emulated.



Ah thereee it is :-)
I'd merge it into 3/7.

anyway,
Reviewed-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>


> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> index 50e08635e18a..a1643ca988e0 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
> @@ -1247,6 +1247,7 @@ static int __kvmppc_handle_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>   	if (bytes > sizeof(run->mmio.data)) {
>   		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bad MMIO length: %d\n", __func__,
>   		       bytes);
> +		return EMULATE_FAIL;
>   	}
>   
>   	run->mmio.phys_addr = vcpu->arch.paddr_accessed;
> @@ -1336,6 +1337,7 @@ int kvmppc_handle_store(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>   	if (bytes > sizeof(run->mmio.data)) {
>   		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bad MMIO length: %d\n", __func__,
>   		       bytes);
> +		return EMULATE_FAIL;
>   	}
>   
>   	run->mmio.phys_addr = vcpu->arch.paddr_accessed;

-- 
Alexey