From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: wi nk <wink@technolu.st>
Cc: Govind Singh <govinds@codeaurora.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Devin Bayer <dev@doubly.so>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Thomas Krause <thomaskrause@posteo.de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
ath11k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: pci_alloc_irq_vectors fails ENOSPC for XPS 13 9310
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 21:45:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a6vn4r02.fsf@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHUdJJVVj3y-mHxAyUx=P51hG=NspuHe=cOWWRxEjYF0nVquyw@mail.gmail.com> (wi nk's message of "Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:30:33 +0100")
(please don't top post, makes it harder to read emails)
wi nk <wink@technolu.st> writes:
> Ok with 7fef431be9c9 reverted, it doesn't seem to change the initialization any:
>
> [ 7.961867] ath11k_pci 0000:55:00.0: WARNING: ath11k PCI support is
> experimental!
> [ 7.961913] ath11k_pci 0000:55:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem
> 0x8e300000-0x8e3fffff 64bit]
> [ 7.961930] ath11k_pci 0000:55:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
> [ 7.962009] ath11k_pci 0000:55:00.0: MSI vectors: 1
> [ 8.461553] ath11k_pci 0000:55:00.0: Respond mem req failed,
> result: 1, err: 48
> [ 8.461556] ath11k_pci 0000:55:00.0: qmi failed to respond fw mem req:-22
I also see this -22 error (see my logs in [1]), even when the firmware
reboots normally. Do you see anything after these messages?
The problem which reverting 7fef431be9c9 helps has these errors:
ath11k_pci 0000:06:00.0: qmi failed memory request, err = -110
ath11k_pci 0000:06:00.0: qmi failed to respond fw mem req:-110
[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/ath11k/2020-November/000641.html
> and just for thoroughness, here are my firmware file checksums (sha256):
>
> 9cc48d1dce819ead4112c6a8051c51e4d75e2b11f99ba9d8738cf8108967b70e amss.bin
> 5081930c3b207f8ed82ff250f9b90fb77e87b2a92c3cf80ad020a58dea0bc5b7 board.bin
> 596482f780d21645f72a48acd9aed6c6fc8cf2d039ac31552a19800674d253cc m3.bin
But these do not look same. I have:
a101dc90f8e876f39383b60c9da64ec4 /lib/firmware/ath11k/QCA6390/hw2.0/amss.bin
4c0781f659d2b7d6bef10a2e3d457728 /lib/firmware/ath11k/QCA6390/hw2.0/board-2.bin
d4c912a3501a3694a3f460d13de06d28 /lib/firmware/ath11k/QCA6390/hw2.0/m3.bin
Download them like this:
wget https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/raw/master/QCA6390/hw2.0/1.0.1/WLAN.HST.1.0.1-01740-QCAHSTSWPLZ_V2_TO_X86-1/amss.bin
wget https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/raw/master/QCA6390/hw2.0/1.0.1/WLAN.HST.1.0.1-01740-QCAHSTSWPLZ_V2_TO_X86-1/m3.bin
wget https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/raw/master/QCA6390/hw2.0/board-2.bin
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
--
ath11k mailing list
ath11k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: wi nk <wink@technolu.st>
Cc: Govind Singh <govinds@codeaurora.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Devin Bayer <dev@doubly.so>,
ath11k@lists.infradead.org,
Thomas Krause <thomaskrause@posteo.de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: pci_alloc_irq_vectors fails ENOSPC for XPS 13 9310
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 21:45:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a6vn4r02.fsf@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHUdJJVVj3y-mHxAyUx=P51hG=NspuHe=cOWWRxEjYF0nVquyw@mail.gmail.com> (wi nk's message of "Wed, 11 Nov 2020 20:30:33 +0100")
(please don't top post, makes it harder to read emails)
wi nk <wink@technolu.st> writes:
> Ok with 7fef431be9c9 reverted, it doesn't seem to change the initialization any:
>
> [ 7.961867] ath11k_pci 0000:55:00.0: WARNING: ath11k PCI support is
> experimental!
> [ 7.961913] ath11k_pci 0000:55:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem
> 0x8e300000-0x8e3fffff 64bit]
> [ 7.961930] ath11k_pci 0000:55:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
> [ 7.962009] ath11k_pci 0000:55:00.0: MSI vectors: 1
> [ 8.461553] ath11k_pci 0000:55:00.0: Respond mem req failed,
> result: 1, err: 48
> [ 8.461556] ath11k_pci 0000:55:00.0: qmi failed to respond fw mem req:-22
I also see this -22 error (see my logs in [1]), even when the firmware
reboots normally. Do you see anything after these messages?
The problem which reverting 7fef431be9c9 helps has these errors:
ath11k_pci 0000:06:00.0: qmi failed memory request, err = -110
ath11k_pci 0000:06:00.0: qmi failed to respond fw mem req:-110
[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/ath11k/2020-November/000641.html
> and just for thoroughness, here are my firmware file checksums (sha256):
>
> 9cc48d1dce819ead4112c6a8051c51e4d75e2b11f99ba9d8738cf8108967b70e amss.bin
> 5081930c3b207f8ed82ff250f9b90fb77e87b2a92c3cf80ad020a58dea0bc5b7 board.bin
> 596482f780d21645f72a48acd9aed6c6fc8cf2d039ac31552a19800674d253cc m3.bin
But these do not look same. I have:
a101dc90f8e876f39383b60c9da64ec4 /lib/firmware/ath11k/QCA6390/hw2.0/amss.bin
4c0781f659d2b7d6bef10a2e3d457728 /lib/firmware/ath11k/QCA6390/hw2.0/board-2.bin
d4c912a3501a3694a3f460d13de06d28 /lib/firmware/ath11k/QCA6390/hw2.0/m3.bin
Download them like this:
wget https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/raw/master/QCA6390/hw2.0/1.0.1/WLAN.HST.1.0.1-01740-QCAHSTSWPLZ_V2_TO_X86-1/amss.bin
wget https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/raw/master/QCA6390/hw2.0/1.0.1/WLAN.HST.1.0.1-01740-QCAHSTSWPLZ_V2_TO_X86-1/m3.bin
wget https://github.com/kvalo/ath11k-firmware/raw/master/QCA6390/hw2.0/board-2.bin
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-11 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-17 11:01 pci_alloc_irq_vectors fails ENOSPC for XPS 13 9310 Thomas Krause
2020-10-19 8:09 ` Kalle Valo
2020-10-20 20:46 ` Thomas Krause
2020-11-02 18:34 ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-02 18:49 ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-02 18:49 ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-02 20:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-02 20:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-03 3:01 ` Carl Huang
2020-11-03 3:01 ` Carl Huang
2020-11-03 6:49 ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-03 6:49 ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-03 16:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-03 16:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-11-03 21:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-03 21:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-03 22:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-03 22:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-09 18:44 ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-09 18:44 ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-04 13:04 ` Thomas Krause
2020-11-04 13:04 ` Thomas Krause
2020-11-04 15:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-04 15:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-05 13:23 ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-05 13:23 ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-06 11:57 ` Stefani Seibold
2020-11-10 8:33 ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-10 8:33 ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-11 8:53 ` Thomas Krause
2020-11-11 8:53 ` Thomas Krause
2020-11-11 9:22 ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-11 9:22 ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-11 19:10 ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-11 19:10 ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-11 19:24 ` wi nk
2020-11-11 19:24 ` wi nk
2020-11-11 19:30 ` wi nk
2020-11-11 19:30 ` wi nk
2020-11-11 19:45 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2020-11-11 19:45 ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-11 20:12 ` wi nk
2020-11-11 20:12 ` wi nk
2020-11-11 21:35 ` Stefani Seibold
2020-11-11 21:35 ` Stefani Seibold
2020-11-11 22:02 ` Stefani Seibold
2020-11-11 22:02 ` Stefani Seibold
2020-11-12 0:24 ` wi nk
2020-11-12 0:24 ` wi nk
2020-11-12 1:10 ` wi nk
2020-11-12 1:10 ` wi nk
2020-11-12 1:11 ` wi nk
2020-11-12 1:11 ` wi nk
2020-11-12 2:31 ` wi nk
2020-11-12 2:31 ` wi nk
2020-11-12 6:29 ` Carl Huang
2020-11-12 6:29 ` Carl Huang
2020-11-12 7:05 ` Stefani Seibold
2020-11-12 7:05 ` Stefani Seibold
2020-11-12 7:15 ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-12 7:15 ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-12 7:41 ` wi nk
2020-11-12 7:41 ` wi nk
2020-11-12 8:59 ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-12 8:59 ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-12 15:44 ` wi nk
2020-11-12 15:44 ` wi nk
2020-11-13 9:52 ` wi nk
2020-11-13 9:52 ` wi nk
2020-11-15 13:30 ` Thomas Krause
2020-11-15 13:30 ` Thomas Krause
2020-11-15 19:55 ` wi nk
2020-11-15 19:55 ` wi nk
2020-11-17 15:49 ` wi nk
2020-11-17 15:49 ` wi nk
2020-11-17 20:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-17 20:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-18 10:22 ` wi nk
2020-11-18 10:22 ` wi nk
2020-11-11 9:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-11 9:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-06 11:45 ` Devin Bayer
2020-11-06 11:45 ` Devin Bayer
2020-11-09 18:48 ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-09 18:48 ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-03 11:20 ` Devin Bayer
2020-11-03 11:20 ` Devin Bayer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a6vn4r02.fsf@codeaurora.org \
--to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=dev@doubly.so \
--cc=govinds@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefani@seibold.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomaskrause@posteo.de \
--cc=wink@technolu.st \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.