From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Govind Singh <govinds@codeaurora.org>,
ath11k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mhi tree
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 19:45:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a6x9g89a.fsf@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200928094704.GB11515@linux> (Manivannan Sadhasivam's message of "Mon, 28 Sep 2020 15:17:04 +0530")
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 12:34:40PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 06:42:30PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> After merging the mhi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
>> >> failed like this:
>> >>
>> >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mhi.c:27:4: error: 'struct
>> >> mhi_channel_config' has no member named 'auto_start'
>> >> 27 | .auto_start = false,
>> >> | ^~~~~~~~~~
>> >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mhi.c:42:4: error: 'struct
>> >> mhi_channel_config' has no member named 'auto_start'
>> >> 42 | .auto_start = false,
>> >> | ^~~~~~~~~~
>> >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mhi.c:57:4: error: 'struct
>> >> mhi_channel_config' has no member named 'auto_start'
>> >> 57 | .auto_start = true,
>> >> | ^~~~~~~~~~
>> >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mhi.c:72:4: error: 'struct
>> >> mhi_channel_config' has no member named 'auto_start'
>> >> 72 | .auto_start = true,
>> >> | ^~~~~~~~~~
>> >>
>> >> Caused by commit
>> >>
>> >> ed39d7816885 ("bus: mhi: Remove auto-start option")
>> >>
>> >> interacting with commit
>> >>
>> >> 1399fb87ea3e ("ath11k: register MHI controller device for QCA6390")
>> >>
>> >> from the net-next tree.
>> >>
>> >> I applied the following merge fix patch, but maybe more is required.
>> >> Even if so, this could be fixed now in the net-next tree.
>> >>
>> >> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
>> >> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 18:39:41 +1000
>> >> Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "ath11k: register MHI controller device for QCA6390"
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
>> >
>> > Sorry, I forgot to submit a patch against net-next for fixing this while merging
>> > the MHI change.
>>
>> Try to notify the ath11k list (CCed) whenever changing MHI API so that
>> we (ath11k folks) can be prepared for any major changes.
>>
>
> Okay sure, will do!
Thanks. It's important that ath11k is taken into account while making
changes to MHI, otherwise there can easily be regressions.
I was looking at commit ed39d7816885 ("bus: mhi: Remove auto-start
option") and noticed this in the commit log:
This is really up to the MHI device(channel) driver to manage the state
of its channels.
So does this mean we have to make changes in ath11k to accomodate this?
I haven't tested linux-next yet.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
--
ath11k mailing list
ath11k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ath11k@lists.infradead.org,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Govind Singh <govinds@codeaurora.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mhi tree
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 19:45:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a6x9g89a.fsf@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200928094704.GB11515@linux> (Manivannan Sadhasivam's message of "Mon, 28 Sep 2020 15:17:04 +0530")
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 12:34:40PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 06:42:30PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> After merging the mhi tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
>> >> failed like this:
>> >>
>> >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mhi.c:27:4: error: 'struct
>> >> mhi_channel_config' has no member named 'auto_start'
>> >> 27 | .auto_start = false,
>> >> | ^~~~~~~~~~
>> >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mhi.c:42:4: error: 'struct
>> >> mhi_channel_config' has no member named 'auto_start'
>> >> 42 | .auto_start = false,
>> >> | ^~~~~~~~~~
>> >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mhi.c:57:4: error: 'struct
>> >> mhi_channel_config' has no member named 'auto_start'
>> >> 57 | .auto_start = true,
>> >> | ^~~~~~~~~~
>> >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/mhi.c:72:4: error: 'struct
>> >> mhi_channel_config' has no member named 'auto_start'
>> >> 72 | .auto_start = true,
>> >> | ^~~~~~~~~~
>> >>
>> >> Caused by commit
>> >>
>> >> ed39d7816885 ("bus: mhi: Remove auto-start option")
>> >>
>> >> interacting with commit
>> >>
>> >> 1399fb87ea3e ("ath11k: register MHI controller device for QCA6390")
>> >>
>> >> from the net-next tree.
>> >>
>> >> I applied the following merge fix patch, but maybe more is required.
>> >> Even if so, this could be fixed now in the net-next tree.
>> >>
>> >> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
>> >> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 18:39:41 +1000
>> >> Subject: [PATCH] fix up for "ath11k: register MHI controller device for QCA6390"
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
>> >
>> > Sorry, I forgot to submit a patch against net-next for fixing this while merging
>> > the MHI change.
>>
>> Try to notify the ath11k list (CCed) whenever changing MHI API so that
>> we (ath11k folks) can be prepared for any major changes.
>>
>
> Okay sure, will do!
Thanks. It's important that ath11k is taken into account while making
changes to MHI, otherwise there can easily be regressions.
I was looking at commit ed39d7816885 ("bus: mhi: Remove auto-start
option") and noticed this in the commit log:
This is really up to the MHI device(channel) driver to manage the state
of its channels.
So does this mean we have to make changes in ath11k to accomodate this?
I haven't tested linux-next yet.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-28 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-28 8:42 linux-next: build failure after merge of the mhi tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-28 9:10 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-09-28 9:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-28 9:34 ` Kalle Valo
2020-09-28 9:34 ` Kalle Valo
2020-09-28 9:47 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-09-28 9:47 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-09-28 16:45 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2020-09-28 16:45 ` Kalle Valo
2020-09-28 17:04 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-09-28 17:04 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-09-29 6:18 ` Kalle Valo
2020-09-29 6:18 ` Kalle Valo
2020-09-29 15:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-09-29 15:35 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-11-09 4:16 Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-09 7:42 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2022-03-02 6:37 Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-02 6:48 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-08-09 9:38 Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-09 9:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-11-17 4:12 Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-17 4:23 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-11-17 4:28 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-11-17 4:28 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-11-17 9:15 ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-17 9:15 ` Kalle Valo
2020-11-18 4:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-18 4:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-18 4:51 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-18 5:06 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-11-18 9:39 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-11-18 10:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-08-19 3:48 Stephen Rothwell
2020-08-19 3:49 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-08-19 4:04 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-08-19 5:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a6x9g89a.fsf@codeaurora.org \
--to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=govinds@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.