From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: Okamoto Takayuki <tokamoto@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Christoffer Dall <cdall@kernel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/16] arm64/sve: Enable SVE state tracking for non-task contexts
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:58:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a7qfto1m.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1529593060-542-8-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> writes:
> The current FPSIMD/SVE context handling support for non-task (i.e.,
> KVM vcpu) contexts does not take SVE into account. This means that
> only task contexts can safely use SVE at present.
>
> In preparation for enabling KVM guests to use SVE, it is necessary
> to keep track of SVE state for non-task contexts too.
>
> This patch adds the necessary support, removing assumptions from
> the context switch code about the location of the SVE context
> storage.
>
> When binding a vcpu context, its vector length is arbitrarily
> specified as sve_max_vl for now. In any case, because TIF_SVE is
> presently cleared at vcpu context bind time, the specified vector
> length will not be used for anything yet. In later patches TIF_SVE
> will be set here as appropriate, and the appropriate maximum vector
> length for the vcpu will be passed when binding.
<snip>
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> @@ -121,6 +121,8 @@
> */
> struct fpsimd_last_state_struct {
> struct user_fpsimd_state *st;
> + void *sve_state;
> + unsigned int sve_vl;
> };
> - struct user_fpsimd_state *st = __this_cpu_read(fpsimd_last_state.st);
> + struct fpsimd_last_state_struct const *last =
> + this_cpu_ptr(&fpsimd_last_state);
<snip>
> @@ -1074,6 +1082,8 @@ void fpsimd_bind_state_to_cpu(struct user_fpsimd_state *st)
> WARN_ON(!in_softirq() && !irqs_disabled());
>
> last->st = st;
> + last->sve_state = sve_state;
> + last->sve_vl = sve_vl;
> }
I'm suffering a little cognitive dissonance with the use of last here
because isn't it really the state as it is now - as we bind to the cpu?
Anyway not super relevant to this patch as the name has already been
chosen so:
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
--
Alex Bennée
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: alex.bennee@linaro.org (Alex Bennée)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 07/16] arm64/sve: Enable SVE state tracking for non-task contexts
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:58:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a7qfto1m.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1529593060-542-8-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> writes:
> The current FPSIMD/SVE context handling support for non-task (i.e.,
> KVM vcpu) contexts does not take SVE into account. This means that
> only task contexts can safely use SVE at present.
>
> In preparation for enabling KVM guests to use SVE, it is necessary
> to keep track of SVE state for non-task contexts too.
>
> This patch adds the necessary support, removing assumptions from
> the context switch code about the location of the SVE context
> storage.
>
> When binding a vcpu context, its vector length is arbitrarily
> specified as sve_max_vl for now. In any case, because TIF_SVE is
> presently cleared at vcpu context bind time, the specified vector
> length will not be used for anything yet. In later patches TIF_SVE
> will be set here as appropriate, and the appropriate maximum vector
> length for the vcpu will be passed when binding.
<snip>
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c
> @@ -121,6 +121,8 @@
> */
> struct fpsimd_last_state_struct {
> struct user_fpsimd_state *st;
> + void *sve_state;
> + unsigned int sve_vl;
> };
> - struct user_fpsimd_state *st = __this_cpu_read(fpsimd_last_state.st);
> + struct fpsimd_last_state_struct const *last =
> + this_cpu_ptr(&fpsimd_last_state);
<snip>
> @@ -1074,6 +1082,8 @@ void fpsimd_bind_state_to_cpu(struct user_fpsimd_state *st)
> WARN_ON(!in_softirq() && !irqs_disabled());
>
> last->st = st;
> + last->sve_state = sve_state;
> + last->sve_vl = sve_vl;
> }
I'm suffering a little cognitive dissonance with the use of last here
because isn't it really the state as it is now - as we bind to the cpu?
Anyway not super relevant to this patch as the name has already been
chosen so:
Reviewed-by: Alex Benn?e <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
--
Alex Benn?e
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-25 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 178+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-21 14:57 [RFC PATCH 00/16] KVM: arm64: Initial support for SVE guests Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 01/16] arm64: fpsimd: Always set TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE on task state flush Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-06 9:07 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-06 9:07 ` Alex Bennée
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 02/16] KVM: arm64: Delete orphaned declaration for __fpsimd_enabled() Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-06 9:08 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-06 9:08 ` Alex Bennée
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 03/16] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_arm_num_regs() for easier maintenance Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-06 9:20 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-06 9:20 ` Alex Bennée
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 04/16] KVM: arm64: Add missing #include of <linux/bitmap.h> to kvm_host.h Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-06 9:21 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-06 9:21 ` Alex Bennée
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 05/16] KVM: arm: Add arch init/uninit hooks Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-06 10:02 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-06 10:02 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-09 15:15 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-09 15:15 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 06/16] arm64/sve: Determine virtualisation-friendly vector lengths Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-06 13:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-07-06 13:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 07/16] arm64/sve: Enable SVE state tracking for non-task contexts Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 13:58 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2018-07-25 13:58 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-25 14:39 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 14:39 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 08/16] KVM: arm64: Support dynamically hideable system registers Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 14:12 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-25 14:12 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-25 14:36 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 14:36 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 15:41 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-25 15:41 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-26 12:53 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-26 12:53 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-07 19:20 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-07 19:20 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-08 8:33 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-08 8:33 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 09/16] KVM: arm64: Allow ID registers to by dynamically read-as-zero Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 15:46 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-25 15:46 ` Alex Bennée
2018-08-06 13:03 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-06 13:03 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-07 11:09 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-07 11:09 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-07 19:35 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-07 19:35 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-08 9:11 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-08 9:11 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-08 9:58 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-08 9:58 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-08 14:03 ` Peter Maydell
2018-08-08 14:03 ` Peter Maydell
2018-08-09 10:19 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-09 10:19 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 10/16] KVM: arm64: Add a vcpu flag to control SVE visibility for the guest Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-19 11:08 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-19 11:08 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 11:41 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 11:41 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 13:43 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 13:43 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 14:41 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 14:41 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-19 15:02 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-19 15:02 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 11:48 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 11:48 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 11/16] KVM: arm64/sve: System register context switch and access support Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-19 11:11 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-19 11:11 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 11:45 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 11:45 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 12/16] KVM: arm64/sve: Context switch the SVE registers Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-19 13:13 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-19 13:13 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 11:50 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 11:50 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 13:57 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 13:57 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 14:12 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 14:12 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-06 13:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-06 13:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-07 11:15 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-07 11:15 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-07 19:43 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-07 19:43 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-08 8:23 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-08 8:23 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 13/16] KVM: Allow 2048-bit register access via KVM_{GET, SET}_ONE_REG Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 15:58 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-25 15:58 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-26 12:58 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-26 12:58 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-26 13:55 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-26 13:55 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-27 9:26 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-27 9:26 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 14/16] KVM: arm64/sve: Add SVE support to register access ioctl interface Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-19 13:04 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-19 13:04 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 14:06 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 14:06 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 17:20 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 17:20 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-26 13:10 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-26 13:10 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-03 14:57 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-03 14:57 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-03 15:11 ` Andrew Jones
2018-08-03 15:11 ` Andrew Jones
2018-08-03 15:38 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-03 15:38 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-06 13:25 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-06 13:25 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-07 11:17 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-07 11:17 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 15/16] KVM: arm64: Enumerate SVE register indices for KVM_GET_REG_LIST Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-19 14:12 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-19 14:12 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 14:50 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 14:50 ` Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH 16/16] KVM: arm64/sve: Report and enable SVE API extensions for userspace Dave Martin
2018-06-21 14:57 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-19 14:59 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-19 14:59 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 15:27 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 15:27 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-25 16:52 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-25 16:52 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-26 13:18 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-26 13:18 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-06 13:41 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-06 13:41 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-07 11:23 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-07 11:23 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-07 20:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-07 20:08 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-08 8:30 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-08 8:30 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-19 15:24 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-19 15:24 ` Andrew Jones
2018-07-26 13:23 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-26 13:23 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-06 8:22 ` [RFC PATCH 00/16] KVM: arm64: Initial support for SVE guests Alex Bennée
2018-07-06 8:22 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-06 9:05 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-06 9:05 ` Dave Martin
2018-07-06 9:20 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-06 9:20 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-06 9:23 ` Peter Maydell
2018-07-06 9:23 ` Peter Maydell
2018-07-06 10:11 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-06 10:11 ` Alex Bennée
2018-07-06 10:14 ` Peter Maydell
2018-07-06 10:14 ` Peter Maydell
2018-08-06 13:05 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-06 13:05 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-08-07 11:18 ` Dave Martin
2018-08-07 11:18 ` Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a7qfto1m.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cdall@kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=tokamoto@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.