Re: Promoting Git developers

[David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>]

Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com> writes:

> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Randall S. Becker
> <rsbecker@nexbridge.com> wrote:
>>> On March 15, 2015 6:19 PM Christian Couder wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> Just one suggestion on the name and half a comment.
>>>
>>> How would "Git Review" (or "Git Monthly Review", or replace your favourite
>>> "how-often-per-period-ly" in its name) sound?  I meant it to sound similar
>> to
>>> academic journals that summarize and review contemporary works in the
>> field
>>> and keeps your original "pun" about our culture around "patch reviews".
>
> I would be ok for that but there is already this Gerrit related command:
>
> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/git-review
>
> Maybe I can just use "Git Rev", but it doesn't tell that it is about news?
>
>> If I may humbly offer the suggestion that "Git Blame" would be a far more
>> appropriate pun as a name :)
>
> You don't want me to steal Junio's blog title:
>
> http://git-blame.blogspot.fr/
>
> don't you?

"Git Annotate"?

-- 
David Kastrup