* [PATCH net v4 1/1] net/sched: fix pedit partial COW leading to page cache corruption
@ 2026-05-30 8:06 Jamal Hadi Salim
2026-05-30 15:19 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jamal Hadi Salim @ 2026-05-30 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Cc: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, horms, jiri, victor,
david.laight.linux, yimingqian591, keenanat2000, 2045gemini,
rollkingzzc, toke, dcaratti, security, linux-kernel, Rajat Gupta,
Jamal Hadi Salim
From: Rajat Gupta <rajat.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com>
tcf_pedit_act() computes the COW range for skb_ensure_writable()
once before the key loop using tcfp_off_max_hint, but the hint does
not account for the runtime header offset added by typed keys. This
can leave part of the write region un-COW'd.
Fix by moving skb_ensure_writable() inside the per-key loop where
the actual write offset is known, and add overflow checking on the
offset arithmetic. For negative offsets (e.g. Ethernet header edits
at ingress), use skb_cow() to COW the headroom instead. Guard
offset_valid() against INT_MIN, where negation is undefined.
Fixes: 8b796475fd78 ("net/sched: act_pedit: really ensure the skb is writable")
Reported-by: Yiming Qian <yimingqian591@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Keenan Dong <keenanat2000@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Han Guidong <2045gemini@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Zhang Cen <rollkingzzc@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Han Guidong <2045gemini@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Han Guidong <2045gemini@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Victor Nogueira <victor@mojatatu.com>
Tested-by: Victor Nogueira <victor@mojatatu.com>
Acked-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Signed-off-by: Rajat Gupta <rajat.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
v3->v4
1) Restore the Fixes tag which was accidentally deleted in v3
2) Remove tcfp_off_max_hint as pointed by sashiko [1]
3) Fix a boundary condition identified by sashiko [1]
4) Add unaligned access support to safely access ptr support to compensate for
removal of skb_header_pointer() / skb_store_bits() which handled it fine
[1]https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260527181731.1166373-1-jhs%40mojatatu.com
---
include/net/tc_act/tc_pedit.h | 1 -
net/sched/act_pedit.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/tc_act/tc_pedit.h b/include/net/tc_act/tc_pedit.h
index f58ee15cd858..cb7b82f2cbc7 100644
--- a/include/net/tc_act/tc_pedit.h
+++ b/include/net/tc_act/tc_pedit.h
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ struct tcf_pedit_parms {
struct tc_pedit_key *tcfp_keys;
struct tcf_pedit_key_ex *tcfp_keys_ex;
int action;
- u32 tcfp_off_max_hint;
unsigned char tcfp_nkeys;
unsigned char tcfp_flags;
struct rcu_head rcu;
diff --git a/net/sched/act_pedit.c b/net/sched/act_pedit.c
index bc20f08a2789..4e60793d184a 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_pedit.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_pedit.c
@@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
#include <linux/ip.h>
#include <linux/ipv6.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/overflow.h>
+#include <linux/unaligned.h>
#include <net/ipv6.h>
#include <net/netlink.h>
#include <net/pkt_sched.h>
@@ -242,7 +244,6 @@ static int tcf_pedit_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
goto out_free_ex;
}
- nparms->tcfp_off_max_hint = 0;
nparms->tcfp_flags = parm->flags;
nparms->tcfp_nkeys = parm->nkeys;
@@ -273,9 +274,6 @@ static int tcf_pedit_init(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
*/
cur += (0xff & offmask) >> nparms->tcfp_keys[i].shift;
- /* Each key touches 4 bytes starting from the computed offset */
- nparms->tcfp_off_max_hint =
- max(nparms->tcfp_off_max_hint, cur + 4);
}
p = to_pedit(*a);
@@ -318,15 +316,12 @@ static void tcf_pedit_cleanup(struct tc_action *a)
call_rcu(&parms->rcu, tcf_pedit_cleanup_rcu);
}
-static bool offset_valid(struct sk_buff *skb, int offset)
+static bool offset_valid(struct sk_buff *skb, int offset, int len)
{
- if (offset > 0 && offset > skb->len)
+ if (offset < -(int)skb_headroom(skb))
return false;
- if (offset < 0 && -offset > skb_headroom(skb))
- return false;
-
- return true;
+ return offset <= (int)skb->len - len;
}
static int pedit_l4_skb_offset(struct sk_buff *skb, int *hoffset, const int header_type)
@@ -393,18 +388,10 @@ TC_INDIRECT_SCOPE int tcf_pedit_act(struct sk_buff *skb,
struct tcf_pedit_key_ex *tkey_ex;
struct tcf_pedit_parms *parms;
struct tc_pedit_key *tkey;
- u32 max_offset;
int i;
parms = rcu_dereference_bh(p->parms);
- max_offset = (skb_transport_header_was_set(skb) ?
- skb_transport_offset(skb) :
- skb_network_offset(skb)) +
- parms->tcfp_off_max_hint;
- if (skb_ensure_writable(skb, min(skb->len, max_offset)))
- goto done;
-
tcf_lastuse_update(&p->tcf_tm);
tcf_action_update_bstats(&p->common, skb);
@@ -412,10 +399,11 @@ TC_INDIRECT_SCOPE int tcf_pedit_act(struct sk_buff *skb,
tkey_ex = parms->tcfp_keys_ex;
for (i = parms->tcfp_nkeys; i > 0; i--, tkey++) {
+ int write_offset, write_len;
int offset = tkey->off;
int hoffset = 0;
- u32 *ptr, hdata;
- u32 val;
+ u32 cur_val, val;
+ u32 *ptr;
int rc;
if (tkey_ex) {
@@ -433,13 +421,15 @@ TC_INDIRECT_SCOPE int tcf_pedit_act(struct sk_buff *skb,
if (tkey->offmask) {
u8 *d, _d;
+ int at_offset;
- if (!offset_valid(skb, hoffset + tkey->at)) {
+ if (check_add_overflow(hoffset, tkey->at, &at_offset) ||
+ !offset_valid(skb, at_offset, sizeof(_d))) {
pr_info_ratelimited("tc action pedit 'at' offset %d out of bounds\n",
hoffset + tkey->at);
goto bad;
}
- d = skb_header_pointer(skb, hoffset + tkey->at,
+ d = skb_header_pointer(skb, at_offset,
sizeof(_d), &_d);
if (!d)
goto bad;
@@ -451,31 +441,51 @@ TC_INDIRECT_SCOPE int tcf_pedit_act(struct sk_buff *skb,
}
}
- if (!offset_valid(skb, hoffset + offset)) {
- pr_info_ratelimited("tc action pedit offset %d out of bounds\n", hoffset + offset);
+ if (check_add_overflow(hoffset, offset, &write_offset)) {
+ pr_info_ratelimited("tc action pedit offset overflow\n");
goto bad;
}
- ptr = skb_header_pointer(skb, hoffset + offset,
- sizeof(hdata), &hdata);
- if (!ptr)
+ if (!offset_valid(skb, write_offset, sizeof(*ptr))) {
+ pr_info_ratelimited("tc action pedit offset %d out of bounds\n",
+ write_offset);
goto bad;
+ }
+
+ if (write_offset < 0) {
+ if (skb_cow(skb, -write_offset))
+ goto bad;
+ if (write_offset + (int)sizeof(*ptr) > 0) {
+ if (skb_ensure_writable(skb,
+ min(skb->len,
+ write_offset + (int)sizeof(*ptr))))
+ goto bad;
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (check_add_overflow(write_offset, (int)sizeof(*ptr),
+ &write_len))
+ goto bad;
+ if (skb_ensure_writable(skb, min_t(int, skb->len,
+ write_len)))
+ goto bad;
+ }
+
+ ptr = (u32 *)(skb->data + write_offset);
+ cur_val = get_unaligned(ptr);
/* just do it, baby */
switch (cmd) {
case TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_CMD_SET:
val = tkey->val;
break;
case TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_CMD_ADD:
- val = (*ptr + tkey->val) & ~tkey->mask;
+ val = (cur_val + tkey->val) & ~tkey->mask;
break;
default:
pr_info_ratelimited("tc action pedit bad command (%d)\n", cmd);
goto bad;
}
- *ptr = ((*ptr & tkey->mask) ^ val);
- if (ptr == &hdata)
- skb_store_bits(skb, hoffset + offset, ptr, 4);
+ put_unaligned((cur_val & tkey->mask) ^ val, ptr);
}
goto done;
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v4 1/1] net/sched: fix pedit partial COW leading to page cache corruption
2026-05-30 8:06 [PATCH net v4 1/1] net/sched: fix pedit partial COW leading to page cache corruption Jamal Hadi Salim
@ 2026-05-30 15:19 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2026-05-30 16:15 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2026-05-30 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jamal Hadi Salim, netdev
Cc: davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, horms, jiri, victor,
david.laight.linux, yimingqian591, keenanat2000, 2045gemini,
rollkingzzc, dcaratti, security, linux-kernel, Rajat Gupta,
Jamal Hadi Salim
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> writes:
> From: Rajat Gupta <rajat.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com>
>
> tcf_pedit_act() computes the COW range for skb_ensure_writable()
> once before the key loop using tcfp_off_max_hint, but the hint does
> not account for the runtime header offset added by typed keys. This
> can leave part of the write region un-COW'd.
>
> Fix by moving skb_ensure_writable() inside the per-key loop where
> the actual write offset is known, and add overflow checking on the
> offset arithmetic. For negative offsets (e.g. Ethernet header edits
> at ingress), use skb_cow() to COW the headroom instead. Guard
> offset_valid() against INT_MIN, where negation is undefined.
>
> Fixes: 8b796475fd78 ("net/sched: act_pedit: really ensure the skb is writable")
> Reported-by: Yiming Qian <yimingqian591@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: Keenan Dong <keenanat2000@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: Han Guidong <2045gemini@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: Zhang Cen <rollkingzzc@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Han Guidong <2045gemini@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Han Guidong <2045gemini@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Victor Nogueira <victor@mojatatu.com>
> Tested-by: Victor Nogueira <victor@mojatatu.com>
> Acked-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rajat Gupta <rajat.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> v3->v4
> 1) Restore the Fixes tag which was accidentally deleted in v3
> 2) Remove tcfp_off_max_hint as pointed by sashiko [1]
> 3) Fix a boundary condition identified by sashiko [1]
> 4) Add unaligned access support to safely access ptr support to compensate for
> removal of skb_header_pointer() / skb_store_bits() which handled it fine
>
> [1]https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260527181731.1166373-1-jhs%40mojatatu.com
Re-tested and LGTM. Let's hope this is the last one ;)
-Toke
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v4 1/1] net/sched: fix pedit partial COW leading to page cache corruption
2026-05-30 15:19 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
@ 2026-05-30 16:15 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2026-05-31 9:58 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jamal Hadi Salim @ 2026-05-30 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Cc: netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, horms, jiri, victor,
david.laight.linux, yimingqian591, keenanat2000, 2045gemini,
rollkingzzc, dcaratti, security, linux-kernel, Rajat Gupta
On Sat, May 30, 2026 at 11:19 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> writes:
>
> > From: Rajat Gupta <rajat.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com>
> >
> > tcf_pedit_act() computes the COW range for skb_ensure_writable()
> > once before the key loop using tcfp_off_max_hint, but the hint does
> > not account for the runtime header offset added by typed keys. This
> > can leave part of the write region un-COW'd.
> >
> > Fix by moving skb_ensure_writable() inside the per-key loop where
> > the actual write offset is known, and add overflow checking on the
> > offset arithmetic. For negative offsets (e.g. Ethernet header edits
> > at ingress), use skb_cow() to COW the headroom instead. Guard
> > offset_valid() against INT_MIN, where negation is undefined.
> >
> > Fixes: 8b796475fd78 ("net/sched: act_pedit: really ensure the skb is writable")
> > Reported-by: Yiming Qian <yimingqian591@gmail.com>
> > Reported-by: Keenan Dong <keenanat2000@gmail.com>
> > Reported-by: Han Guidong <2045gemini@gmail.com>
> > Reported-by: Zhang Cen <rollkingzzc@gmail.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Han Guidong <2045gemini@gmail.com>
> > Tested-by: Han Guidong <2045gemini@gmail.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
> > Tested-by: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
> > Tested-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Victor Nogueira <victor@mojatatu.com>
> > Tested-by: Victor Nogueira <victor@mojatatu.com>
> > Acked-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rajat Gupta <rajat.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > ---
> > v3->v4
> > 1) Restore the Fixes tag which was accidentally deleted in v3
> > 2) Remove tcfp_off_max_hint as pointed by sashiko [1]
> > 3) Fix a boundary condition identified by sashiko [1]
> > 4) Add unaligned access support to safely access ptr support to compensate for
> > removal of skb_header_pointer() / skb_store_bits() which handled it fine
> >
> > [1]https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260527181731.1166373-1-jhs%40mojatatu.com
>
> Re-tested and LGTM. Let's hope this is the last one ;)
>
Fingers crossed ;-> Let's see what our new overlords say tomorrow morning.
cheers,
jamal
> -Toke
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v4 1/1] net/sched: fix pedit partial COW leading to page cache corruption
2026-05-30 16:15 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
@ 2026-05-31 9:58 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2026-05-31 12:29 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jamal Hadi Salim @ 2026-05-31 9:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Cc: netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, horms, jiri, victor,
david.laight.linux, yimingqian591, keenanat2000, 2045gemini,
rollkingzzc, dcaratti, security, linux-kernel, Rajat Gupta
"
On Sat, May 30, 2026 at 12:15 PM Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 30, 2026 at 11:19 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> writes:
> >
[..]
> > Re-tested and LGTM. Let's hope this is the last one ;)
> >
>
> Fingers crossed ;-> Let's see what our new overlords say tomorrow morning.
>
Sigh. Now both sashikos are complaining about the min() macro.
Sashiko 1:
=========
+ if (write_offset < 0) {
+ if (skb_cow(skb, -write_offset))
+ goto bad;
+ if (write_offset + (int)sizeof(*ptr) > 0) {
+ if (skb_ensure_writable(skb,
+ min(skb->len,
+ write_offset + (int)sizeof(*ptr))))
Could this min() macro trigger a build failure?
skb->len is an unsigned int, but write_offset + (int)sizeof(*ptr) evaluates
to a signed int.
The min() macro enforces strict type checking and usually triggers a static
assertion failure when mixing signed and unsigned variables.
--------
And Sashiko 2, on the same issue
===========================
Will this build? In the negative-offset arm the call is
min(skb->len, write_offset + (int)sizeof(*ptr))
skb->len is unsigned int and write_offset is a runtime int local, so
the two arguments differ in signedness. The min() macro in
include/linux/minmax.h enforces signedness compatibility:
#define __careful_cmp(op, x, y) \
__cmp_once_check(op, x, y, ...)
with
BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(!__types_ok(ux, uy), #op "(" #x ", " #y ") signedness error")
__is_nonneg() relies on __builtin_constant_p(), which returns 0 for a
runtime int such as write_offset, so the int side ends up signed-only
while skb->len is unsigned-only and __types_ok() is 0.
The matching positive-offset arm in the same hunk already uses
skb_ensure_writable(skb, min_t(int, skb->len, write_len))
and existing call sites such as those in net/core/skbuff.c and
net/ipv4/tcp_output.c likewise use min_t(int, skb->len, ...). Should
the negative-offset arm use min_t(int, ...) for consistency and to
avoid the signedness BUILD_BUG_ON?
------------
So i looked at why this thing compiles despite the statements above...
I could be wrong but I think the compiler optimizes away with -O2
because under that if statement "if (write_offset + (int)sizeof(*ptr)
> 0)" IOW, the compiler already knows this is a positive outcome.
David, this is what i had asked in the earlier discussion. It dos feel
like it is safe as is, I suppose given the compiler I am using but is
it possible that older compilers may not do this optimization? It will
also very likely fail at lower optimizations..
Shall i restore to min_t()?
cheers,
jamal
David, I am going back to min_t.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v4 1/1] net/sched: fix pedit partial COW leading to page cache corruption
2026-05-31 9:58 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
@ 2026-05-31 12:29 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jamal Hadi Salim @ 2026-05-31 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Cc: netdev, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, horms, jiri, victor,
david.laight.linux, yimingqian591, keenanat2000, 2045gemini,
rollkingzzc, dcaratti, security, linux-kernel, Rajat Gupta
On Sun, May 31, 2026 at 5:58 AM Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> wrote:
>
> "
>
> On Sat, May 30, 2026 at 12:15 PM Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, May 30, 2026 at 11:19 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> writes:
> > >
>
> [..]
>
> > > Re-tested and LGTM. Let's hope this is the last one ;)
> > >
> >
> > Fingers crossed ;-> Let's see what our new overlords say tomorrow morning.
> >
>
> Sigh. Now both sashikos are complaining about the min() macro.
>
> Sashiko 1:
> =========
>
> + if (write_offset < 0) {
> + if (skb_cow(skb, -write_offset))
> + goto bad;
> + if (write_offset + (int)sizeof(*ptr) > 0) {
> + if (skb_ensure_writable(skb,
> + min(skb->len,
> + write_offset + (int)sizeof(*ptr))))
>
> Could this min() macro trigger a build failure?
> skb->len is an unsigned int, but write_offset + (int)sizeof(*ptr) evaluates
> to a signed int.
> The min() macro enforces strict type checking and usually triggers a static
> assertion failure when mixing signed and unsigned variables.
> --------
>
> And Sashiko 2, on the same issue
> ===========================
> Will this build? In the negative-offset arm the call is
> min(skb->len, write_offset + (int)sizeof(*ptr))
> skb->len is unsigned int and write_offset is a runtime int local, so
> the two arguments differ in signedness. The min() macro in
> include/linux/minmax.h enforces signedness compatibility:
> #define __careful_cmp(op, x, y) \
> __cmp_once_check(op, x, y, ...)
> with
> BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(!__types_ok(ux, uy), #op "(" #x ", " #y ") signedness error")
> __is_nonneg() relies on __builtin_constant_p(), which returns 0 for a
> runtime int such as write_offset, so the int side ends up signed-only
> while skb->len is unsigned-only and __types_ok() is 0.
> The matching positive-offset arm in the same hunk already uses
> skb_ensure_writable(skb, min_t(int, skb->len, write_len))
> and existing call sites such as those in net/core/skbuff.c and
> net/ipv4/tcp_output.c likewise use min_t(int, skb->len, ...). Should
> the negative-offset arm use min_t(int, ...) for consistency and to
> avoid the signedness BUILD_BUG_ON?
> ------------
>
> So i looked at why this thing compiles despite the statements above...
> I could be wrong but I think the compiler optimizes away with -O2
> because under that if statement "if (write_offset + (int)sizeof(*ptr)
> > 0)" IOW, the compiler already knows this is a positive outcome.
>
> David, this is what i had asked in the earlier discussion. It dos feel
> like it is safe as is, I suppose given the compiler I am using but is
> it possible that older compilers may not do this optimization? It will
> also very likely fail at lower optimizations..
> Shall i restore to min_t()?
>
> David, I am going back to min_t.
That was definetely subliminal ;-> I am going to make another update.
David you can improve things after, I just want this thing to go in so
going back to min_t.
Although these changes should not affect functionality, to everyone
who tested and reviewed if you can go ahead and review/test.
cheers,
jamal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-31 12:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-30 8:06 [PATCH net v4 1/1] net/sched: fix pedit partial COW leading to page cache corruption Jamal Hadi Salim
2026-05-30 15:19 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2026-05-30 16:15 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2026-05-31 9:58 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2026-05-31 12:29 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.