From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
Cc: IGT-Dev@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org, Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 i-g-t] tests/i915: Skip gem_exec_fair on GuC based platforms
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 15:34:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bl3pdiil.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211015215434.2036919-1-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 14:54:34 -0700, <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> wrote:
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c
> index ef5a450f6..5cbb48f5a 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c
> @@ -1314,6 +1314,12 @@ igt_main
> igt_require(gem_scheduler_enabled(i915));
> igt_require(gem_scheduler_has_ctx_priority(i915));
>
> + /*
> + * These tests are for a specific scheduling model which is
> + * not currently implemented by GuC. So skip on GuC platforms.
> + */
> + igt_require(!gem_has_guc_submission(i915));
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: <IGT-Dev@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org>, <Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 i-g-t] tests/i915: Skip gem_exec_fair on GuC based platforms
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 15:34:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bl3pdiil.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211015215434.2036919-1-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 14:54:34 -0700, <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> wrote:
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c
> index ef5a450f6..5cbb48f5a 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c
> @@ -1314,6 +1314,12 @@ igt_main
> igt_require(gem_scheduler_enabled(i915));
> igt_require(gem_scheduler_has_ctx_priority(i915));
>
> + /*
> + * These tests are for a specific scheduling model which is
> + * not currently implemented by GuC. So skip on GuC platforms.
> + */
> + igt_require(!gem_has_guc_submission(i915));
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-15 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-15 21:54 [igt-dev] [PATCH v3 i-g-t] tests/i915: Skip gem_exec_fair on GuC based platforms John.C.Harrison
2021-10-15 21:54 ` [Intel-gfx] " John.C.Harrison
2021-10-15 22:34 ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2021-10-15 22:34 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-10-15 22:48 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/i915: Skip gem_exec_fair on GuC based platforms (rev3) Patchwork
2021-10-16 3:26 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bl3pdiil.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=IGT-Dev@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
--cc=Intel-GFX@Lists.FreeDesktop.Org \
--cc=John.C.Harrison@Intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.