All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>,
	Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
	"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/14] vfio: Provide better generic support for open/release vfio_device_ops
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 16:42:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bl6u76m5.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4-v2-b6a5582525c9+ff96-vfio_reflck_jgg@nvidia.com>

On Tue, Jul 20 2021, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:

> Currently the driver ops have an open/release pair that is called once
> each time a device FD is opened or closed. Add an additional set of
> open/close_device() ops which are called when the device FD is opened for
> the first time and closed for the last time.
>
> An analysis shows that all of the drivers require this semantic. Some are
> open coding it as part of their reflck implementation, and some are just
> buggy and miss it completely.
>
> To retain the current semantics PCI and FSL depend on, introduce the idea
> of a "device set" which is a grouping of vfio_device's that share the same
> lock around opening.
>
> The device set is established by providing a 'set_id' pointer. All
> vfio_device's that provide the same pointer will be joined to the same
> singleton memory and lock across the whole set. This effectively replaces
> the oddly named reflck.
>
> After conversion the set_id will be sourced from:
>  - A struct device from a fsl_mc_device (fsl)
>  - A struct pci_slot (pci)
>  - A struct pci_bus (pci)
>  - The struct vfio_device (everything)
>
> The design ensures that the above pointers are live as long as the
> vfio_device is registered, so they form reliable unique keys to group
> vfio_devices into sets.
>
> This implementation uses xarray instead of searching through the driver
> core structures, which simplifies the somewhat tricky locking in this
> area.
>
> Following patches convert all the drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c |  22 +++++
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.c           | 146 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  include/linux/mdev.h          |   2 +
>  include/linux/vfio.h          |  19 +++++
>  4 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
	Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>,
	Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/14] vfio: Provide better generic support for open/release vfio_device_ops
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 16:42:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bl6u76m5.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4-v2-b6a5582525c9+ff96-vfio_reflck_jgg@nvidia.com>

On Tue, Jul 20 2021, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:

> Currently the driver ops have an open/release pair that is called once
> each time a device FD is opened or closed. Add an additional set of
> open/close_device() ops which are called when the device FD is opened for
> the first time and closed for the last time.
>
> An analysis shows that all of the drivers require this semantic. Some are
> open coding it as part of their reflck implementation, and some are just
> buggy and miss it completely.
>
> To retain the current semantics PCI and FSL depend on, introduce the idea
> of a "device set" which is a grouping of vfio_device's that share the same
> lock around opening.
>
> The device set is established by providing a 'set_id' pointer. All
> vfio_device's that provide the same pointer will be joined to the same
> singleton memory and lock across the whole set. This effectively replaces
> the oddly named reflck.
>
> After conversion the set_id will be sourced from:
>  - A struct device from a fsl_mc_device (fsl)
>  - A struct pci_slot (pci)
>  - A struct pci_bus (pci)
>  - The struct vfio_device (everything)
>
> The design ensures that the above pointers are live as long as the
> vfio_device is registered, so they form reliable unique keys to group
> vfio_devices into sets.
>
> This implementation uses xarray instead of searching through the driver
> core structures, which simplifies the somewhat tricky locking in this
> area.
>
> Following patches convert all the drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c |  22 +++++
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.c           | 146 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  include/linux/mdev.h          |   2 +
>  include/linux/vfio.h          |  19 +++++
>  4 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Jason Herne <jjherne@linux.ibm.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
	Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Cc: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>,
	Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
	"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/14] vfio: Provide better generic support for open/release vfio_device_ops
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 16:42:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bl6u76m5.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4-v2-b6a5582525c9+ff96-vfio_reflck_jgg@nvidia.com>

On Tue, Jul 20 2021, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:

> Currently the driver ops have an open/release pair that is called once
> each time a device FD is opened or closed. Add an additional set of
> open/close_device() ops which are called when the device FD is opened for
> the first time and closed for the last time.
>
> An analysis shows that all of the drivers require this semantic. Some are
> open coding it as part of their reflck implementation, and some are just
> buggy and miss it completely.
>
> To retain the current semantics PCI and FSL depend on, introduce the idea
> of a "device set" which is a grouping of vfio_device's that share the same
> lock around opening.
>
> The device set is established by providing a 'set_id' pointer. All
> vfio_device's that provide the same pointer will be joined to the same
> singleton memory and lock across the whole set. This effectively replaces
> the oddly named reflck.
>
> After conversion the set_id will be sourced from:
>  - A struct device from a fsl_mc_device (fsl)
>  - A struct pci_slot (pci)
>  - A struct pci_bus (pci)
>  - The struct vfio_device (everything)
>
> The design ensures that the above pointers are live as long as the
> vfio_device is registered, so they form reliable unique keys to group
> vfio_devices into sets.
>
> This implementation uses xarray instead of searching through the driver
> core structures, which simplifies the somewhat tricky locking in this
> area.
>
> Following patches convert all the drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/mdev/vfio_mdev.c |  22 +++++
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.c           | 146 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  include/linux/mdev.h          |   2 +
>  include/linux/vfio.h          |  19 +++++
>  4 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-22 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 122+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-20 17:42 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/14] Provide core infrastructure for managing open/release Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/14] vfio/samples: Remove module get/put Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23  7:18   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23  7:18     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/14] vfio/mbochs: Fix missing error unwind in mbochs_probe() Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 22:01   ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2021-07-20 22:01     ` Alex Williamson
2021-07-20 22:01     ` Alex Williamson
2021-07-20 22:49     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 22:49       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 22:49       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 22:54       ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2021-07-20 22:54         ` Alex Williamson
2021-07-20 22:54         ` Alex Williamson
2021-07-21  9:18       ` [Intel-gfx] " Cornelia Huck
2021-07-21  9:18         ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-21  9:18         ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-21  9:16   ` [Intel-gfx] " Cornelia Huck
2021-07-21  9:16     ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-21  9:16     ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/14] vfio: Introduce a vfio_uninit_group_dev() API call Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-21 11:33   ` [Intel-gfx] " Cornelia Huck
2021-07-21 11:33     ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-21 11:33     ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-23  7:18   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23  7:18     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/14] vfio: Provide better generic support for open/release vfio_device_ops Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-22 14:42   ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2021-07-22 14:42     ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-22 14:42     ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-23  7:39   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23  7:39     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23 14:38     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23 14:38       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23 14:38       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/14] vfio/samples: Delete useless open/close Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23  7:39   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23  7:39     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/14] vfio/fsl: Move to the device set infrastructure Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23  7:44   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23  7:44     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23 12:22     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23 12:22       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23 12:22       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23 12:29       ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23 12:29         ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23 13:11         ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23 13:11           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23 13:11           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/14] vfio/platform: Use open_device() instead of open coding a refcnt scheme Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-22 14:48   ` [Intel-gfx] " Cornelia Huck
2021-07-22 14:48     ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-22 14:48     ` Cornelia Huck
2021-07-23  7:45   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23  7:45     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23 12:23     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23 12:23       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23 12:23       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/14] vfio/pci: Move to the device set infrastructure Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23  7:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23  7:47     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23 12:59     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23 12:59       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23 12:59       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/14] vfio/pci: Change vfio_pci_try_bus_reset() to use the dev_set Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23  8:05   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23  8:05     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23 13:30     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23 13:30       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23 13:30       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/14] vfio/pci: Reorganize VFIO_DEVICE_PCI_HOT_RESET to use the device set Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23  8:12   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23  8:12     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23 13:31     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23 13:31       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23 13:31       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/14] vfio/mbochs: Fix close when multiple device FDs are open Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23  8:13   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23  8:13     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/14] vfio/ap, ccw: Fix open/close " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` [PATCH v2 12/14] vfio/ap,ccw: " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/14] vfio/gvt: " Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23  8:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23  8:14     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-20 17:43 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/14] vfio: Remove struct vfio_device_ops open/release Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:43   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-20 17:43   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-07-23  8:14   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-23  8:14     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-07-20 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Provide core infrastructure for managing open/release (rev4) Patchwork
2021-07-20 17:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2021-07-20 18:25 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-20 19:53 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2021-07-20 22:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Provide core infrastructure for managing open/release (rev5) Patchwork
2021-07-23  9:41 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Provide core infrastructure for managing open/release (rev6) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87bl6u76m5.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=vneethv@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
    --cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.