* linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the userns tree
@ 2019-02-05 20:33 Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-05 21:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-02-05 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric W. Biederman; +Cc: Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 265 bytes --]
Hi Eric,
In commit
a692933a8769 ("signal: Always attempt to allocate siginfo for SIGSTOP")
Fixes tag
Fixes: 6dfc88977e42 ("[PATCH] shared thread signals")
has these problem(s):
- Target SHA1 does not exist
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the userns tree 2019-02-05 20:33 linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the userns tree Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-02-05 21:29 ` Eric W. Biederman 2019-02-05 23:04 ` Stephen Rothwell 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2019-02-05 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> writes: > Hi Eric, > > In commit > > a692933a8769 ("signal: Always attempt to allocate siginfo for SIGSTOP") > > Fixes tag > > Fixes: 6dfc88977e42 ("[PATCH] shared thread signals") > > has these problem(s): > > - Target SHA1 does not exist The SHA1 tag does exist and I have another tag: History Tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git That lists the tree it actually came from. That is the best way I can see to handle bugs that predate v2.6.12 that Linus first put into git. Would it make sense to graft you tree that you check for the existence of bad sha1s to Thomas's import of the bk tree into git? Is there a better way to refer to old commits that I haven't seen? Eric ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the userns tree 2019-02-05 21:29 ` Eric W. Biederman @ 2019-02-05 23:04 ` Stephen Rothwell 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-02-05 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric W. Biederman; +Cc: Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 847 bytes --] Hi Eric, On Tue, 05 Feb 2019 15:29:04 -0600 ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote: > > The SHA1 tag does exist and I have another tag: > History Tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git > That lists the tree it actually came from. Ah, tricky. > That is the best way I can see to handle bugs that predate v2.6.12 that > Linus first put into git. > > Would it make sense to graft you tree that you check for the existence > of bad sha1s to Thomas's import of the bk tree into git? I can just get a copy of that tree and check for things in there as well, I guess. Though it shouldn't come up much (I hope :-)) > Is there a better way to refer to old commits that I haven't seen? Not that I am aware of and I guess it is as good as any. Thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the userns tree @ 2019-02-05 23:04 ` Stephen Rothwell 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2019-02-05 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric W. Biederman; +Cc: Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 847 bytes --] Hi Eric, On Tue, 05 Feb 2019 15:29:04 -0600 ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote: > > The SHA1 tag does exist and I have another tag: > History Tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git > That lists the tree it actually came from. Ah, tricky. > That is the best way I can see to handle bugs that predate v2.6.12 that > Linus first put into git. > > Would it make sense to graft you tree that you check for the existence > of bad sha1s to Thomas's import of the bk tree into git? I can just get a copy of that tree and check for things in there as well, I guess. Though it shouldn't come up much (I hope :-)) > Is there a better way to refer to old commits that I haven't seen? Not that I am aware of and I guess it is as good as any. Thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the userns tree
@ 2020-04-21 1:22 Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2020-04-21 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric W. Biederman; +Cc: Linux Next Mailing List, Linux Kernel Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 375 bytes --]
Hi all,
In commit
e854a70f6f0b ("signal: Avoid corrupting si_pid and si_uid in do_notify_parent")
Fixes tag
Fixes: 6588c1e3ff01 ("signals: SI_USER: Masquerade si_pid when crossing pid ns boundary
has these problem(s):
- Subject has leading but no trailing parentheses
- Subject has leading but no trailing quotes
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in threadend of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-21 1:22 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2019-02-05 20:33 linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the userns tree Stephen Rothwell 2019-02-05 21:29 ` Eric W. Biederman 2019-02-05 23:04 ` Stephen Rothwell 2019-02-05 23:04 ` Stephen Rothwell -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2020-04-21 1:22 Stephen Rothwell
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.