Re: cpufreq on PandaBoard

[Ben Gamari <bgamari.foss@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1394 bytes --]

Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> writes:

> On 11/19/2013 11:18 AM, Ben Gamari wrote:
>> 
>> I take it that the clock node work does not itself fix cpufreq? I've
>> built the 3.12-dt-clks-v10-dev branch. On the bright side, it boots and
>> appears to run just fine. Unfortunately, there isn't even a mention of
>> cpufreq in the boot log.
>
> You are probably picking up a branch that is yet to be posted :)...
> and I assume you know the risk of in-development patches ;)
> 
The house hasn't burned down yet... ;)

> - the branch looks to introduce purely clock nodes which patch [2]
> adds on to and makes cpufreq work as a start..
>
Thanks!

>> 
>> I've seen your Google+ post[1] from May enumerating the steps to having
>> working DVFS. It would be useful to post an update showing what has been
>> merged, what is waiting for merge, and what is still in progress.
>
> We are still at "step 1 - get clock nodes" :(... and no, situation has
> not improved since May 2013 when I originally posted that G+ comment
> (and not because we have not been trying..).
>
Ouch. Good luck! 

>> I wasn't asking for official support, just wondering where work is
>> currently happening.
>
> they are happening here in linux-omap mailing list.. just that the
> changes are pretty fundamental and a lot of discussions have been
> taking place
> 
Thanks!

Cheers,

- Ben

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 489 bytes --]