Re: RISC OS port

[Johan Rydberg <jrydberg@night.trouble.net>]

Marco Gerards <metgerards@student.han.nl> writes:

> Timothy Baldwin <tim.lists@majoroak.f2s.com> writes:
>
>> Instead part of functionality of the stubs is included in 
>> kern/arm/RISC_OS/startup.S, as such we are free to choose which names we use 
>> for them. For clairity I suggest we use the standard names, as opposed to 
>> prefixing the names with grub_RISC_OS_ or simular.
>
> Better use a prefix, right?  I don't see how it will get clearer by
> not using the prefix.  And the coding style used in GRUB says to use
> prefixes, so we can better do that unless it really is not possible.

And please choose something else than grub_RISC_OS_ -- like
grub_risc_os.  Otherwise I will not be able to get a good nights sleep
for years to come.


~j