[PATCH] ath10k: Fix qmi init error handling

[PATCH] ath10k: Fix qmi init error handling

[Jeffrey Hugo]

When ath10k_qmi_init() fails, the error handling does not free the irq
resources, which causes an issue if we EPROBE_DEFER as we'll attempt to
(re-)register irqs which are already registered.

Fixes: ba94c753ccb4 ("ath10k: add QMI message handshake for wcn3990 client")
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
index fc15a0037f0e..f2a0b7aaad3b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
@@ -1729,7 +1729,7 @@ static int ath10k_snoc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	ret = ath10k_qmi_init(ar, msa_size);
 	if (ret) {
 		ath10k_warn(ar, "failed to register wlfw qmi client: %d\n", ret);
-		goto err_core_destroy;
+		goto err_free_irq;
 	}
 
 	ath10k_dbg(ar, ATH10K_DBG_SNOC, "snoc probe\n");
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

[PATCH] ath10k: Fix qmi init error handling

[Jeffrey Hugo]

When ath10k_qmi_init() fails, the error handling does not free the irq
resources, which causes an issue if we EPROBE_DEFER as we'll attempt to
(re-)register irqs which are already registered.

Fixes: ba94c753ccb4 ("ath10k: add QMI message handshake for wcn3990 client")
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
index fc15a0037f0e..f2a0b7aaad3b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
@@ -1729,7 +1729,7 @@ static int ath10k_snoc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	ret = ath10k_qmi_init(ar, msa_size);
 	if (ret) {
 		ath10k_warn(ar, "failed to register wlfw qmi client: %d\n", ret);
-		goto err_core_destroy;
+		goto err_free_irq;
 	}
 
 	ath10k_dbg(ar, ATH10K_DBG_SNOC, "snoc probe\n");
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Fix qmi init error handling

[Simon Horman]

On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 03:16:50PM -0800, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> When ath10k_qmi_init() fails, the error handling does not free the irq
> resources, which causes an issue if we EPROBE_DEFER as we'll attempt to
> (re-)register irqs which are already registered.
> 
> Fixes: ba94c753ccb4 ("ath10k: add QMI message handshake for wcn3990 client")
> Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
> index fc15a0037f0e..f2a0b7aaad3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
> @@ -1729,7 +1729,7 @@ static int ath10k_snoc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	ret = ath10k_qmi_init(ar, msa_size);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		ath10k_warn(ar, "failed to register wlfw qmi client: %d\n", ret);
> -		goto err_core_destroy;
> +		goto err_free_irq;
>  	}

From a casual examination of the code this seems like a step in the right
direction. But does this error path also need to call ath10k_hw_power_off() ?

>  
>  	ath10k_dbg(ar, ATH10K_DBG_SNOC, "snoc probe\n");
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Fix qmi init error handling

[Simon Horman]

On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 03:16:50PM -0800, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> When ath10k_qmi_init() fails, the error handling does not free the irq
> resources, which causes an issue if we EPROBE_DEFER as we'll attempt to
> (re-)register irqs which are already registered.
> 
> Fixes: ba94c753ccb4 ("ath10k: add QMI message handshake for wcn3990 client")
> Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
> index fc15a0037f0e..f2a0b7aaad3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
> @@ -1729,7 +1729,7 @@ static int ath10k_snoc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	ret = ath10k_qmi_init(ar, msa_size);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		ath10k_warn(ar, "failed to register wlfw qmi client: %d\n", ret);
> -		goto err_core_destroy;
> +		goto err_free_irq;
>  	}

From a casual examination of the code this seems like a step in the right
direction. But does this error path also need to call ath10k_hw_power_off() ?

>  
>  	ath10k_dbg(ar, ATH10K_DBG_SNOC, "snoc probe\n");
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Fix qmi init error handling

[Jeffrey Hugo]

On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 1:42 AM Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 03:16:50PM -0800, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > When ath10k_qmi_init() fails, the error handling does not free the irq
> > resources, which causes an issue if we EPROBE_DEFER as we'll attempt to
> > (re-)register irqs which are already registered.
> >
> > Fixes: ba94c753ccb4 ("ath10k: add QMI message handshake for wcn3990 client")
> > Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
> > index fc15a0037f0e..f2a0b7aaad3b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
> > @@ -1729,7 +1729,7 @@ static int ath10k_snoc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >       ret = ath10k_qmi_init(ar, msa_size);
> >       if (ret) {
> >               ath10k_warn(ar, "failed to register wlfw qmi client: %d\n", ret);
> > -             goto err_core_destroy;
> > +             goto err_free_irq;
> >       }
>
> From a casual examination of the code this seems like a step in the right
> direction. But does this error path also need to call ath10k_hw_power_off() ?

It probably should.  I don't see any fatal errors from the step being
skipped, although it might silence some regulator warnings about being
left on.  Unlikely to be observed by most folks as I was initing the
driver pretty early to debug some things.  Looks like Kalle already
picked up this patch though, so I guess your suggestion would need to
be a follow up.

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Fix qmi init error handling

[Jeffrey Hugo]

On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 1:42 AM Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 03:16:50PM -0800, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> > When ath10k_qmi_init() fails, the error handling does not free the irq
> > resources, which causes an issue if we EPROBE_DEFER as we'll attempt to
> > (re-)register irqs which are already registered.
> >
> > Fixes: ba94c753ccb4 ("ath10k: add QMI message handshake for wcn3990 client")
> > Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
> > index fc15a0037f0e..f2a0b7aaad3b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
> > @@ -1729,7 +1729,7 @@ static int ath10k_snoc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >       ret = ath10k_qmi_init(ar, msa_size);
> >       if (ret) {
> >               ath10k_warn(ar, "failed to register wlfw qmi client: %d\n", ret);
> > -             goto err_core_destroy;
> > +             goto err_free_irq;
> >       }
>
> From a casual examination of the code this seems like a step in the right
> direction. But does this error path also need to call ath10k_hw_power_off() ?

It probably should.  I don't see any fatal errors from the step being
skipped, although it might silence some regulator warnings about being
left on.  Unlikely to be observed by most folks as I was initing the
driver pretty early to debug some things.  Looks like Kalle already
picked up this patch though, so I guess your suggestion would need to
be a follow up.

Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Fix qmi init error handling

[Kalle Valo]

Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com> writes:

> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 1:42 AM Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 03:16:50PM -0800, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
>> > When ath10k_qmi_init() fails, the error handling does not free the irq
>> > resources, which causes an issue if we EPROBE_DEFER as we'll attempt to
>> > (re-)register irqs which are already registered.
>> >
>> > Fixes: ba94c753ccb4 ("ath10k: add QMI message handshake for wcn3990 client")
>> > Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c | 2 +-
>> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
>> > index fc15a0037f0e..f2a0b7aaad3b 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
>> > @@ -1729,7 +1729,7 @@ static int ath10k_snoc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> >       ret = ath10k_qmi_init(ar, msa_size);
>> >       if (ret) {
>> >               ath10k_warn(ar, "failed to register wlfw qmi client: %d\n", ret);
>> > -             goto err_core_destroy;
>> > +             goto err_free_irq;
>> >       }
>>
>> From a casual examination of the code this seems like a step in the right
>> direction. But does this error path also need to call ath10k_hw_power_off() ?
>
> It probably should.  I don't see any fatal errors from the step being
> skipped, although it might silence some regulator warnings about being
> left on.  Unlikely to be observed by most folks as I was initing the
> driver pretty early to debug some things.  Looks like Kalle already
> picked up this patch though, so I guess your suggestion would need to
> be a follow up.

Actually it's only in the pending branch, which means that the patch can
be changed or a new version can be submitted:

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/drivers/ath10k/submittingpatches#patch_flow

The easiest way to check the state of a wireless patch is from
patchwork:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11231325/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches#checking_state_of_patches_from_patchwork

-- 
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Fix qmi init error handling

[Kalle Valo]

Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com> writes:

> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 1:42 AM Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 03:16:50PM -0800, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
>> > When ath10k_qmi_init() fails, the error handling does not free the irq
>> > resources, which causes an issue if we EPROBE_DEFER as we'll attempt to
>> > (re-)register irqs which are already registered.
>> >
>> > Fixes: ba94c753ccb4 ("ath10k: add QMI message handshake for wcn3990 client")
>> > Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c | 2 +-
>> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
>> > index fc15a0037f0e..f2a0b7aaad3b 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
>> > @@ -1729,7 +1729,7 @@ static int ath10k_snoc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> >       ret = ath10k_qmi_init(ar, msa_size);
>> >       if (ret) {
>> >               ath10k_warn(ar, "failed to register wlfw qmi client: %d\n", ret);
>> > -             goto err_core_destroy;
>> > +             goto err_free_irq;
>> >       }
>>
>> From a casual examination of the code this seems like a step in the right
>> direction. But does this error path also need to call ath10k_hw_power_off() ?
>
> It probably should.  I don't see any fatal errors from the step being
> skipped, although it might silence some regulator warnings about being
> left on.  Unlikely to be observed by most folks as I was initing the
> driver pretty early to debug some things.  Looks like Kalle already
> picked up this patch though, so I guess your suggestion would need to
> be a follow up.

Actually it's only in the pending branch, which means that the patch can
be changed or a new version can be submitted:

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/drivers/ath10k/submittingpatches#patch_flow

The easiest way to check the state of a wireless patch is from
patchwork:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11231325/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches#checking_state_of_patches_from_patchwork

-- 
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Fix qmi init error handling

[Jeffrey Hugo]

On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 9:57 PM Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 1:42 AM Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 03:16:50PM -0800, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> >> > When ath10k_qmi_init() fails, the error handling does not free the irq
> >> > resources, which causes an issue if we EPROBE_DEFER as we'll attempt to
> >> > (re-)register irqs which are already registered.
> >> >
> >> > Fixes: ba94c753ccb4 ("ath10k: add QMI message handshake for wcn3990 client")
> >> > Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
> >> > ---
> >> >  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c | 2 +-
> >> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
> >> > index fc15a0037f0e..f2a0b7aaad3b 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
> >> > @@ -1729,7 +1729,7 @@ static int ath10k_snoc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> >       ret = ath10k_qmi_init(ar, msa_size);
> >> >       if (ret) {
> >> >               ath10k_warn(ar, "failed to register wlfw qmi client: %d\n", ret);
> >> > -             goto err_core_destroy;
> >> > +             goto err_free_irq;
> >> >       }
> >>
> >> From a casual examination of the code this seems like a step in the right
> >> direction. But does this error path also need to call ath10k_hw_power_off() ?
> >
> > It probably should.  I don't see any fatal errors from the step being
> > skipped, although it might silence some regulator warnings about being
> > left on.  Unlikely to be observed by most folks as I was initing the
> > driver pretty early to debug some things.  Looks like Kalle already
> > picked up this patch though, so I guess your suggestion would need to
> > be a follow up.
>
> Actually it's only in the pending branch, which means that the patch can
> be changed or a new version can be submitted:

Thats an interesting flow.  Ok.

>
> https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/drivers/ath10k/submittingpatches#patch_flow
>
> The easiest way to check the state of a wireless patch is from
> patchwork:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11231325/
>
> https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches#checking_state_of_patches_from_patchwork
>
> --
> https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Fix qmi init error handling

[Jeffrey Hugo]

On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 9:57 PM Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 1:42 AM Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 03:16:50PM -0800, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> >> > When ath10k_qmi_init() fails, the error handling does not free the irq
> >> > resources, which causes an issue if we EPROBE_DEFER as we'll attempt to
> >> > (re-)register irqs which are already registered.
> >> >
> >> > Fixes: ba94c753ccb4 ("ath10k: add QMI message handshake for wcn3990 client")
> >> > Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@gmail.com>
> >> > ---
> >> >  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c | 2 +-
> >> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
> >> > index fc15a0037f0e..f2a0b7aaad3b 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
> >> > @@ -1729,7 +1729,7 @@ static int ath10k_snoc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> >       ret = ath10k_qmi_init(ar, msa_size);
> >> >       if (ret) {
> >> >               ath10k_warn(ar, "failed to register wlfw qmi client: %d\n", ret);
> >> > -             goto err_core_destroy;
> >> > +             goto err_free_irq;
> >> >       }
> >>
> >> From a casual examination of the code this seems like a step in the right
> >> direction. But does this error path also need to call ath10k_hw_power_off() ?
> >
> > It probably should.  I don't see any fatal errors from the step being
> > skipped, although it might silence some regulator warnings about being
> > left on.  Unlikely to be observed by most folks as I was initing the
> > driver pretty early to debug some things.  Looks like Kalle already
> > picked up this patch though, so I guess your suggestion would need to
> > be a follow up.
>
> Actually it's only in the pending branch, which means that the patch can
> be changed or a new version can be submitted:

Thats an interesting flow.  Ok.

>
> https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/drivers/ath10k/submittingpatches#patch_flow
>
> The easiest way to check the state of a wireless patch is from
> patchwork:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11231325/
>
> https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches#checking_state_of_patches_from_patchwork
>
> --
> https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches