From: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
To: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>, Song Liu <liu.song.a23@gmail.com>
Cc: "Xi Wang" <xi.wang@gmail.com>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@sifive.com>,
"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <kafai@fb.com>,
"Song Liu" <songliubraving@fb.com>, "Yonghong Song" <yhs@fb.com>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bpf, riscv: fix bugs in JIT for 32-bit ALU operations
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 08:22:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d0jzgkai.fsf@netronome.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPhsuW7rOzyJTac7d9PPHeWW39Hu5pV6Mk0xJr8jyr0HH=-W2A@mail.gmail.com>
Song Liu writes:
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 3:34 PM Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 1:53 PM Song Liu <liu.song.a23@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > This is a little messy. How about we introduce some helper function
>> > like:
>> >
>> > /* please find a better name... */
>> > emit_32_or_64(bool is64, const u32 insn_32, const u32 inst_64, struct
>> > rv_jit_context *ctx)
>> > {
>> > if (is64)
>> > emit(insn_64, ctx);
>> > else {
>> > emit(insn_32, ctx);
>> > rd = xxxx;
>> > emit_zext_32(rd, ctx);
>> > }
>> > }
>>
>> This same check is used throughout the file, maybe clean it up in a
>> separate patch?
We also need to enable the recent 32-bit opt (on bpf-next) on these missing
insns, like what has been done at:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/commit/?id=66d0d5a854a6625974e7de4b874e7934988b0ef8
Perhaps the best way is to wait this patch merged back to bpf-next, then we
do two patches, the first one to enable the opt, the second one then do the
re-factor. I guess this could avoid some code conflict.
Regards,
Jiong
>
> Yes, let's do follow up patch.
>
> Thanks,
> Song
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
To: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>, Song Liu <liu.song.a23@gmail.com>
Cc: "Song Liu" <songliubraving@fb.com>,
"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@sifive.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, "Yonghong Song" <yhs@fb.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <kafai@fb.com>, "Xi Wang" <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bpf, riscv: fix bugs in JIT for 32-bit ALU operations
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 08:22:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d0jzgkai.fsf@netronome.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPhsuW7rOzyJTac7d9PPHeWW39Hu5pV6Mk0xJr8jyr0HH=-W2A@mail.gmail.com>
Song Liu writes:
> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 3:34 PM Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 1:53 PM Song Liu <liu.song.a23@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > This is a little messy. How about we introduce some helper function
>> > like:
>> >
>> > /* please find a better name... */
>> > emit_32_or_64(bool is64, const u32 insn_32, const u32 inst_64, struct
>> > rv_jit_context *ctx)
>> > {
>> > if (is64)
>> > emit(insn_64, ctx);
>> > else {
>> > emit(insn_32, ctx);
>> > rd = xxxx;
>> > emit_zext_32(rd, ctx);
>> > }
>> > }
>>
>> This same check is used throughout the file, maybe clean it up in a
>> separate patch?
We also need to enable the recent 32-bit opt (on bpf-next) on these missing
insns, like what has been done at:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/commit/?id=66d0d5a854a6625974e7de4b874e7934988b0ef8
Perhaps the best way is to wait this patch merged back to bpf-next, then we
do two patches, the first one to enable the opt, the second one then do the
re-factor. I guess this could avoid some code conflict.
Regards,
Jiong
>
> Yes, let's do follow up patch.
>
> Thanks,
> Song
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-31 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-30 19:07 [PATCH 1/2] bpf, riscv: fix bugs in JIT for 32-bit ALU operations Luke Nelson
2019-05-30 19:07 ` Luke Nelson
2019-05-30 19:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] bpf: test_bpf: add tests for upper bits of 32-bit operations Luke Nelson
2019-05-30 19:08 ` Luke Nelson
2019-05-30 20:30 ` Jiong Wang
2019-05-30 20:30 ` Jiong Wang
2019-05-30 20:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] bpf, riscv: fix bugs in JIT for 32-bit ALU operations Song Liu
2019-05-30 20:53 ` Song Liu
2019-05-30 22:34 ` Luke Nelson
2019-05-30 22:34 ` Luke Nelson
2019-05-30 23:08 ` Song Liu
2019-05-30 23:08 ` Song Liu
2019-05-31 7:22 ` Jiong Wang [this message]
2019-05-31 7:22 ` Jiong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d0jzgkai.fsf@netronome.com \
--to=jiong.wang@netronome.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.topel@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=liu.song.a23@gmail.com \
--cc=luke.r.nels@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@sifive.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=xi.wang@gmail.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.