* [PATCH] drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
@ 2017-03-16 16:03 Chris Wilson
2017-03-16 16:27 ` Mika Kuoppala
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-03-16 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
This should be impossible, but let's assert that we do not pin a context
4 billion times before retiring!
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 32ec06245281..77574dfc48ef 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -747,6 +747,7 @@ static int execlists_context_pin(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
if (ce->pin_count++)
return 0;
+ GEM_BUG_ON(ce->pin_count); /* no overflow please! */
if (!ce->state) {
ret = execlists_context_deferred_alloc(ctx, engine);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
index e895c99f5dd9..758191e69403 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -1445,6 +1445,7 @@ static int intel_ring_context_pin(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
if (ce->pin_count++)
return 0;
+ GEM_BUG_ON(ce->pin_count); /* no overflow please! */
if (ce->state) {
ret = context_pin(ctx);
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
2017-03-16 16:03 [PATCH] drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow Chris Wilson
@ 2017-03-16 16:27 ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-03-16 16:30 ` Chris Wilson
2017-03-16 16:45 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mika Kuoppala @ 2017-03-16 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> This should be impossible, but let's assert that we do not pin a context
> 4 billion times before retiring!
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index 32ec06245281..77574dfc48ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -747,6 +747,7 @@ static int execlists_context_pin(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>
> if (ce->pin_count++)
> return 0;
> + GEM_BUG_ON(ce->pin_count); /* no overflow please! */
>
!ce->pin_count?
-Mika
> if (!ce->state) {
> ret = execlists_context_deferred_alloc(ctx, engine);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index e895c99f5dd9..758191e69403 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -1445,6 +1445,7 @@ static int intel_ring_context_pin(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>
> if (ce->pin_count++)
> return 0;
> + GEM_BUG_ON(ce->pin_count); /* no overflow please! */
>
> if (ce->state) {
> ret = context_pin(ctx);
> --
> 2.11.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
2017-03-16 16:27 ` Mika Kuoppala
@ 2017-03-16 16:30 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-03-16 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mika Kuoppala; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 06:27:16PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
>
> > This should be impossible, but let's assert that we do not pin a context
> > 4 billion times before retiring!
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> > index 32ec06245281..77574dfc48ef 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> > @@ -747,6 +747,7 @@ static int execlists_context_pin(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> >
> > if (ce->pin_count++)
> > return 0;
> > + GEM_BUG_ON(ce->pin_count); /* no overflow please! */
> >
>
> !ce->pin_count?
You might be right ;)
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
2017-03-16 16:03 [PATCH] drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow Chris Wilson
2017-03-16 16:27 ` Mika Kuoppala
@ 2017-03-16 16:45 ` Patchwork
2017-03-16 17:16 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2017-03-16 17:59 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow (rev2) Patchwork
3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-03-16 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/21390/
State : failure
== Summary ==
Series 21390v1 drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/21390/revisions/1/mbox/
Test core_auth:
Subgroup basic-auth:
pass -> SKIP (fi-snb-2520m)
pass -> SKIP (fi-snb-2600)
pass -> SKIP (fi-bxt-j4205)
pass -> SKIP (fi-kbl-7500u)
pass -> SKIP (fi-ilk-650)
pass -> SKIP (fi-bxt-t5700)
pass -> SKIP (fi-ivb-3520m)
pass -> SKIP (fi-byt-j1900)
pass -> SKIP (fi-byt-n2820)
pass -> SKIP (fi-hsw-4770)
Test core_prop_blob:
Subgroup basic:
pass -> SKIP (fi-snb-2520m)
pass -> SKIP (fi-snb-2600)
pass -> SKIP (fi-bxt-j4205)
pass -> SKIP (fi-kbl-7500u)
pass -> SKIP (fi-ilk-650)
pass -> SKIP (fi-bxt-t5700)
pass -> SKIP (fi-ivb-3520m)
pass -> SKIP (fi-byt-j1900)
pass -> SKIP (fi-byt-n2820)
pass -> SKIP (fi-hsw-4770)
Test drv_getparams_basic:
Subgroup basic-eu-total:
pass -> SKIP (fi-snb-2520m)
pass -> SKIP (fi-snb-2600)
pass -> SKIP (fi-bxt-j4205)
pass -> SKIP (fi-kbl-7500u)
pass -> SKIP (fi-ilk-650)
pass -> SKIP (fi-bxt-t5700)
pass -> SKIP (fi-ivb-3520m)
pass -> SKIP (fi-byt-j1900)
pass -> SKIP (fi-byt-n2820)
pass -> SKIP (fi-hsw-4770)
Subgroup basic-subslice-total:
pass -> SKIP (fi-snb-2520m)
pass -> SKIP (fi-snb-2600)
pass -> SKIP (fi-bxt-j4205)
pass -> SKIP (fi-kbl-7500u)
pass -> SKIP (fi-ilk-650)
pass -> SKIP (fi-bxt-t5700)
pass -> SKIP (fi-ivb-3520m)
pass -> SKIP (fi-byt-j1900)
pass -> SKIP (fi-byt-n2820)
pass -> SKIP (fi-hsw-4770)
Test drv_hangman:
Subgroup error-state-basic:
pass -> SKIP (fi-snb-2520m)
pass -> SKIP (fi-snb-2600)
pass -> SKIP (fi-bxt-j4205)
pass -> SKIP (fi-kbl-7500u)
pass -> SKIP (fi-ilk-650)
pass -> SKIP (fi-bxt-t5700)
pass -> SKIP (fi-ivb-3520m)
pass -> SKIP (fi-byt-j1900)
pass -> SKIP (fi-byt-n2820)
pass -> SKIP (fi-hsw-4770)
Test drv_module_reload:
Subgroup basic-no-display:
pass -> FAIL (fi-snb-2520m)
pass -> FAIL (fi-snb-2600)
pass -> FAIL (fi-bxt-j4205)
pass -> FAIL (fi-kbl-7500u)
pass -> FAIL (fi-ilk-650)
pass -> FAIL (fi-bxt-t5700)
pass -> FAIL (fi-ivb-3520m)
pass -> FAIL (fi-byt-j1900)
pass -> FAIL (fi-byt-n2820)
pass -> FAIL (fi-hsw-4770)
Subgroup basic-reload:
pass -> FAIL (fi-snb-2520m)
pass -> FAIL (fi-snb-2600)
pass -> FAIL (fi-bxt-j4205)
pass -> FAIL (fi-kbl-7500u)
pass -> FAIL (fi-ilk-650) fdo#100045
pass -> FAIL (fi-bxt-t5700)
pass -> FAIL (fi-ivb-3520m)
pass -> FAIL (fi-byt-j1900)
pass -> FAIL (fi-byt-n2820)
pass -> FAIL (fi-hsw-4770)
Subgroup basic-reload-final:
pass -> FAIL (fi-snb-2520m)
pass -> FAIL (fi-snb-2600)
pass -> FAIL (fi-bxt-j4205)
pass -> FAIL (fi-kbl-7500u)
pass -> FAIL (fi-ilk-650) fdo#100045
pass -> FAIL (fi-bxt-t5700)
pass -> FAIL (fi-ivb-3520m)
pass -> FAIL (fi-byt-j1900)
pass -> FAIL (fi-byt-n2820)
pass -> FAIL (fi-hsw-4770)
Test gem_basic:
Subgroup bad-close:
pass -> SKIP (fi-snb-2520m)
pass -> SKIP (fi-snb-2600)
WARNING: Long output truncated
fi-skl-6700k failed to connect after reboot
c1374a7a4a7fb0093d98ad6aa7071c8671fcdf08 drm-tip: 2017y-03m-16d-14h-28m-12s UTC integration manifest
716f41c drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_4204/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
2017-03-16 16:03 [PATCH] drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow Chris Wilson
2017-03-16 16:27 ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-03-16 16:45 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
@ 2017-03-16 17:16 ` Chris Wilson
2017-03-16 17:23 ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-03-17 7:29 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-03-16 17:59 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow (rev2) Patchwork
3 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-03-16 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Mika Kuoppala
This should be impossible, but let's assert that we do not pin a context
4 billion times before retiring!
v2: Fix the assertion -- the patch had just one job to do!
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 73386b7b22fa..aad107337530 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -748,6 +748,7 @@ static int execlists_context_pin(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
if (ce->pin_count++)
return 0;
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!ce->pin_count); /* no overflow please! */
if (!ce->state) {
ret = execlists_context_deferred_alloc(ctx, engine);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
index e895c99f5dd9..be908e2a52ea 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
@@ -1445,6 +1445,7 @@ static int intel_ring_context_pin(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
if (ce->pin_count++)
return 0;
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!ce->pin_count); /* no overflow please! */
if (ce->state) {
ret = context_pin(ctx);
--
2.11.0
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
2017-03-16 17:16 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
@ 2017-03-16 17:23 ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-03-16 20:51 ` Chris Wilson
2017-03-17 7:29 ` Joonas Lahtinen
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mika Kuoppala @ 2017-03-16 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> This should be impossible, but let's assert that we do not pin a context
> 4 billion times before retiring!
>
> v2: Fix the assertion -- the patch had just one job to do!
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index 73386b7b22fa..aad107337530 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -748,6 +748,7 @@ static int execlists_context_pin(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>
> if (ce->pin_count++)
> return 0;
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!ce->pin_count); /* no overflow please! */
>
> if (!ce->state) {
> ret = execlists_context_deferred_alloc(ctx, engine);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index e895c99f5dd9..be908e2a52ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -1445,6 +1445,7 @@ static int intel_ring_context_pin(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>
> if (ce->pin_count++)
> return 0;
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!ce->pin_count); /* no overflow please! */
>
> if (ce->state) {
> ret = context_pin(ctx);
> --
> 2.11.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
2017-03-16 17:23 ` Mika Kuoppala
@ 2017-03-16 20:51 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-03-16 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mika Kuoppala; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 07:23:47PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
>
> > This should be impossible, but let's assert that we do not pin a context
> > 4 billion times before retiring!
> >
> > v2: Fix the assertion -- the patch had just one job to do!
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Ta, applied because I like seeing CI churn (still reassuring myself that
the sporadic bug is now fixed).
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
2017-03-16 17:16 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2017-03-16 17:23 ` Mika Kuoppala
@ 2017-03-17 7:29 ` Joonas Lahtinen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Joonas Lahtinen @ 2017-03-17 7:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx; +Cc: Mika Kuoppala
On to, 2017-03-16 at 17:16 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> This should be impossible, but let's assert that we do not pin a context
> 4 billion times before retiring!
>
> v2: Fix the assertion -- the patch had just one job to do!
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
<SNIP>
> @@ -748,6 +748,7 @@ static int execlists_context_pin(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
>
> if (ce->pin_count++)
> return 0;
> + GEM_BUG_ON(!ce->pin_count); /* no overflow please! */
An average engineer is able to tell this is about overflow, even
without the comment :P
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow (rev2)
2017-03-16 16:03 [PATCH] drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow Chris Wilson
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2017-03-16 17:16 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
@ 2017-03-16 17:59 ` Patchwork
3 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-03-16 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/21390/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 21390v2 drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/21390/revisions/2/mbox/
fi-bdw-5557u total:278 pass:267 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:11 time: 462s
fi-bsw-n3050 total:278 pass:239 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time: 584s
fi-bxt-j4205 total:278 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 time: 533s
fi-bxt-t5700 total:278 pass:258 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time: 570s
fi-byt-j1900 total:278 pass:251 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time: 498s
fi-byt-n2820 total:278 pass:247 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:31 time: 494s
fi-hsw-4770 total:278 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:16 time: 432s
fi-hsw-4770r total:278 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:16 time: 429s
fi-ilk-650 total:278 pass:228 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:50 time: 443s
fi-ivb-3520m total:278 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 time: 517s
fi-ivb-3770 total:278 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 time: 490s
fi-kbl-7500u total:278 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 time: 475s
fi-skl-6260u total:278 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:10 time: 483s
fi-skl-6700hq total:278 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:17 time: 592s
fi-skl-6700k total:278 pass:256 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:18 time: 477s
fi-skl-6770hq total:278 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:10 time: 510s
fi-snb-2520m total:278 pass:250 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time: 551s
fi-snb-2600 total:278 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time: 409s
da5a30c70988b681c2a75b81d283bc66470a2216 drm-tip: 2017y-03m-16d-16h-30m-22s UTC integration manifest
304d2ce drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_4207/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-03-17 7:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-03-16 16:03 [PATCH] drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow Chris Wilson
2017-03-16 16:27 ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-03-16 16:30 ` Chris Wilson
2017-03-16 16:45 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2017-03-16 17:16 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2017-03-16 17:23 ` Mika Kuoppala
2017-03-16 20:51 ` Chris Wilson
2017-03-17 7:29 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-03-16 17:59 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Assert that the context pin_counts do not overflow (rev2) Patchwork
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.