From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
"Masami Hiramatsu" <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
"Sjur Brændeland" <sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 2/4] virtio_console: Use kmalloc instead of kzalloc
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 12:06:34 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d30ahsv1.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350287856-5284-3-git-send-email-sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com>
sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com writes:
> From: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com>
>
> Avoid the more cpu expensive kzalloc when allocating buffers.
> Originally kzalloc was intended for isolating the guest from
> the host by not sending random guest data to the host. But device
> isolation is not yet in place so kzalloc is not really needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com>
This looks fine to me. This is *why* the device gives us the length
which was written; we can trust that, even if we can't trust the
writer of data.
(In theory: noone has implemented such a system, yet).
Applied.
Rusty.
> diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> index c36b2f6..301d17e 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ static struct port_buffer *alloc_buf(size_t buf_size)
> buf = kmalloc(sizeof(*buf), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!buf)
> goto fail;
> - buf->buf = kzalloc(buf_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + buf->buf = kmalloc(buf_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!buf->buf)
> goto free_buf;
> buf->len = 0;
> --
> 1.7.5.4
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com, Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Masami Hiramatsu" <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
"Ohad Ben-Cohen" <ohad@wizery.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, sjurbren@gmail.com,
"Sjur Brændeland" <sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 2/4] virtio_console: Use kmalloc instead of kzalloc
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 12:06:34 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d30ahsv1.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350287856-5284-3-git-send-email-sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com>
sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com writes:
> From: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com>
>
> Avoid the more cpu expensive kzalloc when allocating buffers.
> Originally kzalloc was intended for isolating the guest from
> the host by not sending random guest data to the host. But device
> isolation is not yet in place so kzalloc is not really needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com>
This looks fine to me. This is *why* the device gives us the length
which was written; we can trust that, even if we can't trust the
writer of data.
(In theory: noone has implemented such a system, yet).
Applied.
Rusty.
> diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> index c36b2f6..301d17e 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ static struct port_buffer *alloc_buf(size_t buf_size)
> buf = kmalloc(sizeof(*buf), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!buf)
> goto fail;
> - buf->buf = kzalloc(buf_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + buf->buf = kmalloc(buf_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!buf->buf)
> goto free_buf;
> buf->len = 0;
> --
> 1.7.5.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-23 1:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-15 7:57 [PATCHv7 0/4] virtio_console: Add rproc_serial driver sjur.brandeland
2012-10-15 7:57 ` sjur.brandeland
2012-10-15 7:57 ` [PATCHv7 1/4] virtio_console: Free buffer if splice fails sjur.brandeland
2012-10-15 7:57 ` sjur.brandeland
2012-10-23 0:12 ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-23 0:12 ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-15 7:57 ` [PATCHv7 2/4] virtio_console: Use kmalloc instead of kzalloc sjur.brandeland
2012-10-15 7:57 ` sjur.brandeland
2012-10-23 1:36 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2012-10-23 1:36 ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-15 7:57 ` [PATCHv7 3/4] virtio_console: Merge struct buffer_token into struct port_buffer sjur.brandeland
2012-10-15 7:57 ` sjur.brandeland
2012-10-23 0:19 ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-23 0:19 ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-15 7:57 ` [PATCHv7 4/4] virtio_console: Add support for remoteproc serial sjur.brandeland
2012-10-15 7:57 ` sjur.brandeland
2012-10-23 1:47 ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-28 21:58 ` Sjur Brændeland
2012-10-28 21:58 ` Sjur Brændeland
2012-11-01 7:39 ` Amit Shah
2012-11-01 7:39 ` Amit Shah
2012-11-01 23:22 ` Rusty Russell
2012-11-01 23:22 ` Rusty Russell
2012-11-02 10:20 ` Amit Shah
2012-11-02 10:20 ` Amit Shah
2012-11-02 10:44 ` Sjur BRENDELAND
2012-11-02 10:44 ` Sjur BRENDELAND
2012-11-07 13:43 ` [PATCH resend] virtio_console: Free buffers from out-queue upon close sjur.brandeland
2012-11-07 13:43 ` sjur.brandeland
2012-11-07 23:58 ` Rusty Russell
2012-11-07 23:58 ` Rusty Russell
2012-11-08 8:59 ` Amit Shah
2012-11-08 8:59 ` Amit Shah
2012-11-08 9:25 ` Sjur Brændeland
2012-11-08 9:25 ` Sjur Brændeland
2012-11-07 14:22 ` sjur.brandeland
2012-11-07 14:22 ` sjur.brandeland
2012-10-23 1:47 ` [PATCHv7 4/4] virtio_console: Add support for remoteproc serial Rusty Russell
2012-10-22 13:00 ` [PATCHv7 0/4] virtio_console: Add rproc_serial driver Amit Shah
2012-10-22 13:00 ` Amit Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d30ahsv1.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=sjur.brandeland@stericsson.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.