From: Kevin Hilman <khilman-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
To: Ben Dooks <ben-i2c-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-pm-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: OMAP: fix static suspend vs. runtime suspend
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 10:31:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d3n2nzsi.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110205160843.GD15795-SMNkleLxa3Z6Wcw2j4pizdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org> (Ben Dooks's message of "Sat, 5 Feb 2011 16:08:43 +0000")
Ben Dooks <ben-i2c-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 04:18:41PM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> When runtime PM is enabled, each OMAP i2c device is suspended after
>> each i2c xfer. However, there are two cases when the static suspend
>> methods must be used to ensure the devices are suspended:
>>
>> 1) runtime PM is disabled, either at compile time or dynamically
>> via /sys/devices/.../power/control.
>> 2) an i2c client driver uses i2c during it's suspend callback, thus
>> leaving the i2c driver active (NOTE: runtime suspend transitions are
>> disabled during system suspend, so i2c activity during system
>> suspend will runtime resume the device, but not runtime (re)suspend it.)
>>
>> Since the actual work to suspend the device is handled by the
>> subsytem, call the bus methods to take care of it.
>>
>> NOTE: This takes care of a known suspend problem on OMAP3 where the
>> TWL RTC driver does i2c xfers during its suspend path leaving the i2c
>> driver in an active state (since runtime suspend transistions are
>> disabled.)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>> Ben, this is a regression in 2.6.38 so hopefully this can be queued
>> in the 2.6.38-rc cycle. Thanks.
>
> Ok, after all the discussions should I keep it in my -rc queue?
>
Yes, please.
Kevin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] i2c: OMAP: fix static suspend vs. runtime suspend
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 10:31:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d3n2nzsi.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110205160843.GD15795@trinity.fluff.org> (Ben Dooks's message of "Sat, 5 Feb 2011 16:08:43 +0000")
Ben Dooks <ben-i2c@fluff.org> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 04:18:41PM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> When runtime PM is enabled, each OMAP i2c device is suspended after
>> each i2c xfer. However, there are two cases when the static suspend
>> methods must be used to ensure the devices are suspended:
>>
>> 1) runtime PM is disabled, either at compile time or dynamically
>> via /sys/devices/.../power/control.
>> 2) an i2c client driver uses i2c during it's suspend callback, thus
>> leaving the i2c driver active (NOTE: runtime suspend transitions are
>> disabled during system suspend, so i2c activity during system
>> suspend will runtime resume the device, but not runtime (re)suspend it.)
>>
>> Since the actual work to suspend the device is handled by the
>> subsytem, call the bus methods to take care of it.
>>
>> NOTE: This takes care of a known suspend problem on OMAP3 where the
>> TWL RTC driver does i2c xfers during its suspend path leaving the i2c
>> driver in an active state (since runtime suspend transistions are
>> disabled.)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>> ---
>> Ben, this is a regression in 2.6.38 so hopefully this can be queued
>> in the 2.6.38-rc cycle. Thanks.
>
> Ok, after all the discussions should I keep it in my -rc queue?
>
Yes, please.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-08 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-28 0:18 [PATCH] i2c: OMAP: fix static suspend vs. runtime suspend Kevin Hilman
2011-01-28 0:18 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-01-31 11:28 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-01-31 11:28 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-01-31 11:28 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-01-31 15:13 ` Alan Stern
2011-01-31 15:13 ` [linux-pm] " Alan Stern
2011-01-31 15:13 ` Alan Stern
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1101311010580.1931-100000-IYeN2dnnYyZXsRXLowluHWD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-31 15:28 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-01-31 15:28 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-01-31 15:28 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-01-31 16:09 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-01-31 16:09 ` [linux-pm] " Kevin Hilman
2011-01-31 16:09 ` Kevin Hilman
[not found] ` <877hdl9hsn.fsf-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-31 16:22 ` Alan Stern
2011-01-31 16:22 ` Alan Stern
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1101311119190.1931-100000-IYeN2dnnYyZXsRXLowluHWD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2011-01-31 18:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-01-31 18:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-11 20:00 ` [PATCH] PM: Allow pm_runtime_suspend() to succeed during system suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <201101311919.49225.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-11 20:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-11 20:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-11 20:36 ` Alan Stern
[not found] ` <201102112100.23996.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-11 20:36 ` Alan Stern
2011-02-11 20:36 ` Alan Stern
2011-02-11 20:38 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-02-11 20:38 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-02-11 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <87ei7e9uhy.fsf-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-11 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-11 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-11 23:45 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-02-11 23:45 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-02-12 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <87aai26sq4.fsf-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-12 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-12 0:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-11 23:45 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-02-11 20:38 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-01-31 18:19 ` [PATCH] i2c: OMAP: fix static suspend vs. runtime suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-01-31 16:22 ` Alan Stern
[not found] ` <1296173921-4832-1-git-send-email-khilman-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-05 16:08 ` Ben Dooks
2011-02-05 16:08 ` Ben Dooks
2011-02-08 18:31 ` Kevin Hilman
[not found] ` <20110205160843.GD15795-SMNkleLxa3Z6Wcw2j4pizdi2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2011-02-08 18:31 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-02-08 18:31 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-02-05 16:08 ` Ben Dooks
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-28 0:18 Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d3n2nzsi.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman-l0cymroini0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ben-i2c-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-pm-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rnayak-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.