From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: "Hiremath, Vaibhav" <hvaibhav@ti.com>
Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"Varadarajan, Charulatha" <charu@ti.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-V2] OMAP3EVM:FIX: Reset the smsc911x ethernet controller in board_init
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:08:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d3nikt3j.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19F8576C6E063C45BE387C64729E739404BD7BE3F4@dbde02.ent.ti.com> (Vaibhav Hiremath's message of "Tue, 25 Jan 2011 20:58:44 +0530")
"Hiremath, Vaibhav" <hvaibhav@ti.com> writes:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hiremath, Vaibhav
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 8:53 PM
>> To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Hiremath, Vaibhav; Varadarajan, Charulatha
>> Subject: [PATCH-V2] OMAP3EVM:FIX: Reset the smsc911x ethernet controller
>> in board_init
>>
>> With addition of hwmod support to gpio, the ethernet controller
>> goes undetected for OMAP35xEVM. So explicitly assert the reset signal to
>> ethernet controller smsc911x -
>>
>> - GPIO7 (>=RevG version of EVM's)
>> - GPIO64 (<=RevD version of EVM's)
>>
>> This patch is based on intial version from Charulatha V, reference
>> to original discussion -
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg35784.html
>> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Charulatha V <charu@ti.com>
>> Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>> ---
>> Since Kevin reported that this patch doesn't get applied cleanly,
>> so I am reposting it again after making sure that it gets applied cleanly.
>>
> [Hiremath, Vaibhav] Oops, missed linux-arm-kernel list, adding here.
>
> Not sure whether I need to repost keeping linux-arm-kernel?
>
Also, did you post the smc911x driver fix yet that is needed for testing
with newer kernels?
Kevin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH-V2] OMAP3EVM:FIX: Reset the smsc911x ethernet controller in board_init
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:08:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d3nikt3j.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19F8576C6E063C45BE387C64729E739404BD7BE3F4@dbde02.ent.ti.com> (Vaibhav Hiremath's message of "Tue, 25 Jan 2011 20:58:44 +0530")
"Hiremath, Vaibhav" <hvaibhav@ti.com> writes:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hiremath, Vaibhav
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 8:53 PM
>> To: linux-omap at vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Hiremath, Vaibhav; Varadarajan, Charulatha
>> Subject: [PATCH-V2] OMAP3EVM:FIX: Reset the smsc911x ethernet controller
>> in board_init
>>
>> With addition of hwmod support to gpio, the ethernet controller
>> goes undetected for OMAP35xEVM. So explicitly assert the reset signal to
>> ethernet controller smsc911x -
>>
>> - GPIO7 (>=RevG version of EVM's)
>> - GPIO64 (<=RevD version of EVM's)
>>
>> This patch is based on intial version from Charulatha V, reference
>> to original discussion -
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap at vger.kernel.org/msg35784.html
>> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Charulatha V <charu@ti.com>
>> Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
>> ---
>> Since Kevin reported that this patch doesn't get applied cleanly,
>> so I am reposting it again after making sure that it gets applied cleanly.
>>
> [Hiremath, Vaibhav] Oops, missed linux-arm-kernel list, adding here.
>
> Not sure whether I need to repost keeping linux-arm-kernel?
>
Also, did you post the smc911x driver fix yet that is needed for testing
with newer kernels?
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-27 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-25 15:22 [PATCH-V2] OMAP3EVM:FIX: Reset the smsc911x ethernet controller in board_init Vaibhav Hiremath
2011-01-25 15:28 ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2011-01-25 15:28 ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2011-01-25 16:09 ` Will Deacon
2011-01-25 16:09 ` Will Deacon
2011-01-27 19:58 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-01-27 19:58 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-01-27 20:08 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-01-27 20:08 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-01-29 12:11 ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
2011-01-29 12:11 ` Hiremath, Vaibhav
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-24 19:25 Vaibhav Hiremath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d3nikt3j.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=charu@ti.com \
--cc=hvaibhav@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.