From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
To: Matheus Alves de Almeida <matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fat: batch synchronous mirror writes
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 16:37:12 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ecdchpzr.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261025191006.407209-2-matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br>
Matheus Alves de Almeida <matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br> writes:
> fat_mirror_bhs() currently synchronizes buffer-by-buffer on synchronous
> mounts, serializing I/O and degrading performance.
>
> Make fat_mirror_bhs() batch dirty buffer heads and use fat_sync_bhs()
> to sync several at once. Add a fat_brelse_array() helper that releases
> buffer heads in an array.
>
> Benchmarking was done under QEMU/KVM with a virtio-blk device using
> cache=directsync. Each result is the arithmetic mean of 10 samples.
>
> start = now_ns();
> for (unsigned i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> fallocate(fds[i], FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE, 0, bytes);
> }
> elapsed = now_ns() - start;
>
> Sync-mounted FAT32 using count=16 files:
> File size Cluster size Before After Improvement
> 256MiB 512B 49.81s 12.26s 4.06x
> 1MiB 512B 0.198s 0.057s 3.50x
> 256MiB 4096B 7.060s 1.640s 4.31x
> 1MiB 4096B 0.073s 0.028s 2.60x
>
> Asynchronous mounts were also benchmarked with no noticeable performance
> change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matheus Alves de Almeida <matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br>
> ---
> fs/fat/fat.h | 1 +
> fs/fat/fatent.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> fs/fat/misc.c | 6 ++++
> 3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fat/fat.h b/fs/fat/fat.h
> index b18385461de8..5086c35230ac 100644
> --- a/fs/fat/fat.h
> +++ b/fs/fat/fat.h
> @@ -479,6 +479,7 @@ void fat_truncate_time(struct inode *inode, struct timespec64 *now,
> int fat_update_time(struct inode *inode, enum fs_update_time type,
> unsigned int flags);
> extern int fat_sync_bhs(struct buffer_head **bhs, int nr_bhs);
> +void fat_brelse_array(struct buffer_head *bhs[], int n);
>
> int fat_cache_init(void);
> void fat_cache_destroy(void);
> diff --git a/fs/fat/fatent.c b/fs/fat/fatent.c
> index 8897a5dd522d..4fa1fae5abf9 100644
> --- a/fs/fat/fatent.c
> +++ b/fs/fat/fatent.c
> @@ -376,39 +376,74 @@ int fat_ent_read(struct inode *inode, struct fat_entry *fatent, int entry)
> return ops->ent_get(fatent);
> }
>
> -/* FIXME: We can write the blocks as more big chunk. */
> -static int fat_mirror_bhs(struct super_block *sb, struct buffer_head **bhs,
> - int nr_bhs)
> +static int fat_mirror_one(struct super_block *sb, struct buffer_head **bhs,
> + int nr_bhs, int target)
> {
> struct msdos_sb_info *sbi = MSDOS_SB(sb);
> + sector_t backup_fat = sbi->fat_length * target;
> + /*
> + * Use the value of MAX_BUF_PER_PAGE for 4K pages. This reduces stack
> + * usage on large-page architectures as callers may already have a
> + * MAX_BUF_PER_PAGE-sized array in their stack.
> + */
> + struct buffer_head *dirty[8];
> struct buffer_head *c_bh;
> - int err, n, copy;
> + int err, err2, n, nr_dirty;
>
> + nr_dirty = 0;
> err = 0;
> - for (copy = 1; copy < sbi->fats; copy++) {
> - sector_t backup_fat = sbi->fat_length * copy;
> -
> - for (n = 0; n < nr_bhs; n++) {
> - c_bh = sb_getblk(sb, backup_fat + bhs[n]->b_blocknr);
> - if (!c_bh) {
> - err = -ENOMEM;
> - goto error;
> + for (n = 0; n < nr_bhs; n++) {
> + c_bh = sb_getblk(sb, backup_fat + bhs[n]->b_blocknr);
> + if (!c_bh) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto error;
> + }
> + /* Avoid race with userspace read via bdev */
> + lock_buffer(c_bh);
> + memcpy(c_bh->b_data, bhs[n]->b_data, sb->s_blocksize);
> + set_buffer_uptodate(c_bh);
> + unlock_buffer(c_bh);
> + mmb_mark_buffer_dirty(c_bh,
> + &MSDOS_I(sbi->fat_inode)->i_metadata_bhs);
> + if (sb->s_flags & SB_SYNCHRONOUS) {
> + dirty[nr_dirty] = c_bh;
> + ++nr_dirty;
> + if (nr_dirty == ARRAY_SIZE(dirty)) {
> + err = fat_sync_bhs(dirty, nr_dirty);
> + fat_brelse_array(dirty, nr_dirty);
> + nr_dirty = 0;
> + if (err)
> + goto error;
> }
> - /* Avoid race with userspace read via bdev */
> - lock_buffer(c_bh);
> - memcpy(c_bh->b_data, bhs[n]->b_data, sb->s_blocksize);
> - set_buffer_uptodate(c_bh);
> - unlock_buffer(c_bh);
> - mmb_mark_buffer_dirty(c_bh,
> - &MSDOS_I(sbi->fat_inode)->i_metadata_bhs);
> - if (sb->s_flags & SB_SYNCHRONOUS)
> - err = sync_dirty_buffer(c_bh);
> + } else {
> brelse(c_bh);
> - if (err)
> - goto error;
> }
> }
> +
> error:
> + if (nr_dirty) {
> + err2 = fat_sync_bhs(dirty, nr_dirty);
int err2 = fat_sync_bhs(dirty, nr_dirty);
I'd like to see err2 as local.
> + if (!err)
> + err = err2;
> + fat_brelse_array(dirty, nr_dirty);
> + }
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int fat_mirror_bhs(struct super_block *sb, struct buffer_head **bhs,
> + int nr_bhs)
> +{
> + struct msdos_sb_info *sbi = MSDOS_SB(sb);
> + int err, copy;
> +
> + err = 0;
> + for (copy = 1; copy < sbi->fats; copy++) {
> + err = fat_mirror_one(sb, bhs, nr_bhs, copy);
> + if (err)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> return err;
int err = fat_mirror_one(sb, bhs, nr_bhs, copy);
if (err)
return err;
}
return 0;
very minor (either is ok actually)
> }
>
> diff --git a/fs/fat/misc.c b/fs/fat/misc.c
> index e79762cf1975..f8f89b947baf 100644
> --- a/fs/fat/misc.c
> +++ b/fs/fat/misc.c
> @@ -365,3 +365,9 @@ int fat_sync_bhs(struct buffer_head **bhs, int nr_bhs)
> }
> return err;
> }
> +
> +void fat_brelse_array(struct buffer_head *bhs[], int n)
> +{
> + while (--n >= 0)
> + brelse(bhs[n]);
> +}
I'd like this is noop if n == 0, possibly easier to use and safer in future.
Thanks.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-25 19:10 [PATCH 0/2] fat: improve synchronous mount performance Matheus Alves de Almeida
2026-10-25 19:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] fat: batch synchronous mirror writes Matheus Alves de Almeida
2026-10-26 7:37 ` OGAWA Hirofumi [this message]
2026-10-26 7:39 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2026-10-25 19:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] fat: improve fat_sync_bhs() write submission Matheus Alves de Almeida
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ecdchpzr.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--to=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matheus.aalmeida@inf.ufrgs.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.