From: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
To: Xiaofeng Yuan <xiaofengmian@163.com>, pjw@kernel.org
Cc: palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Xiaofeng Yuan <xiaofengmian@163.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] riscv: probes: simulate c.jal instruction
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 09:41:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87echtiw8t.fsf@yellow.woof> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260626062228.54873-1-xiaofengmian@163.com>
Xiaofeng Yuan <xiaofengmian@163.com> writes:
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/decode-insn.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/decode-insn.c
> index 65d9590bf..8506470e9 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/decode-insn.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/decode-insn.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ riscv_probe_decode_insn(probe_opcode_t *addr, struct arch_probe_insn *api)
> * TODO: the REJECTED ones below need to be implemented
> */
> #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C
> - RISCV_INSN_REJECTED(c_jal, insn);
> + RISCV_INSN_SET_SIMULATE(c_jal, insn);
> RISCV_INSN_REJECTED(c_ebreak, insn);
Nit: move this RISCV_INSN_SET_SIMULATE down to be with the others.
> RISCV_INSN_SET_SIMULATE(c_j, insn);
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/simulate-insn.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/simulate-insn.c
> index fa581590c..6d7a5f949 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/simulate-insn.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/simulate-insn.c
> @@ -163,6 +163,14 @@ bool __kprobes simulate_c_j(u32 opcode, unsigned long addr, struct pt_regs *regs
> return true;
> }
>
> +bool __kprobes simulate_c_jal(u32 opcode, unsigned long addr, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + if (!rv_insn_reg_set_val(regs, 1, addr + 2))
> + return false;
rv_insn_reg_set_val() is a helper to change a register by index. But
it's always RA in this case, so I think it's much clearer to simply:
regs->ra = addr + 2;
(with the two above suggested changes, the patch would look identical to
a patch I have but I forgot to send, and I would be able to give my
Tested-by tag without additional effort from me :D)
Nam
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
To: Xiaofeng Yuan <xiaofengmian@163.com>, pjw@kernel.org
Cc: palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Xiaofeng Yuan <xiaofengmian@163.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] riscv: probes: simulate c.jal instruction
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 09:41:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87echtiw8t.fsf@yellow.woof> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260626062228.54873-1-xiaofengmian@163.com>
Xiaofeng Yuan <xiaofengmian@163.com> writes:
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/decode-insn.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/decode-insn.c
> index 65d9590bf..8506470e9 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/decode-insn.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/decode-insn.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ riscv_probe_decode_insn(probe_opcode_t *addr, struct arch_probe_insn *api)
> * TODO: the REJECTED ones below need to be implemented
> */
> #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C
> - RISCV_INSN_REJECTED(c_jal, insn);
> + RISCV_INSN_SET_SIMULATE(c_jal, insn);
> RISCV_INSN_REJECTED(c_ebreak, insn);
Nit: move this RISCV_INSN_SET_SIMULATE down to be with the others.
> RISCV_INSN_SET_SIMULATE(c_j, insn);
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/simulate-insn.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/simulate-insn.c
> index fa581590c..6d7a5f949 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/simulate-insn.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/simulate-insn.c
> @@ -163,6 +163,14 @@ bool __kprobes simulate_c_j(u32 opcode, unsigned long addr, struct pt_regs *regs
> return true;
> }
>
> +bool __kprobes simulate_c_jal(u32 opcode, unsigned long addr, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + if (!rv_insn_reg_set_val(regs, 1, addr + 2))
> + return false;
rv_insn_reg_set_val() is a helper to change a register by index. But
it's always RA in this case, so I think it's much clearer to simply:
regs->ra = addr + 2;
(with the two above suggested changes, the patch would look identical to
a patch I have but I forgot to send, and I would be able to give my
Tested-by tag without additional effort from me :D)
Nam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-26 7:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-26 6:22 [PATCH v3] riscv: probes: simulate c.jal instruction Xiaofeng Yuan
2026-06-26 6:22 ` Xiaofeng Yuan
2026-06-26 7:41 ` Nam Cao [this message]
2026-06-26 7:41 ` Nam Cao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87echtiw8t.fsf@yellow.woof \
--to=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=xiaofengmian@163.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.