* ballot system back on @ 2024-06-06 12:23 Michael S. Tsirkin 2024-06-06 16:51 ` Cornelia Huck 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2024-06-06 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Cornelia Huck; +Cc: virtio-comment So, things seem to be working, even if they are now a bit harder to set up. Let's start wrapping up 1.3? I think we need to pack up and then do a ballot to ask OASIS to get a special majority vote for us. Right? Cornelia, want to start that? -- MST ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ballot system back on 2024-06-06 12:23 ballot system back on Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2024-06-06 16:51 ` Cornelia Huck 2024-06-06 19:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Cornelia Huck @ 2024-06-06 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael S. Tsirkin; +Cc: virtio-comment On Thu, Jun 06 2024, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > So, things seem to be working, even if they are > now a bit harder to set up. > Let's start wrapping up 1.3? > I think we need to pack up and then do a ballot to ask OASIS to get a > special majority vote for us. > > Right? Cornelia, want to start that? I've now created a ballot to request a special majority vote; please double-check whether I got the incantations right. And because all that work is not really visible: Thank you for getting those ballot scripts working with the new platform! This looks really painful and time consuming... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ballot system back on 2024-06-06 16:51 ` Cornelia Huck @ 2024-06-06 19:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2024-06-07 3:43 ` Parav Pandit 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2024-06-06 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Cornelia Huck; +Cc: virtio-comment On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 06:51:24PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06 2024, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > > > So, things seem to be working, even if they are > > now a bit harder to set up. > > Let's start wrapping up 1.3? > > I think we need to pack up and then do a ballot to ask OASIS to get a > > special majority vote for us. > > > > Right? Cornelia, want to start that? > > I've now created a ballot to request a special majority vote; please > double-check whether I got the incantations right. > > And because all that work is not really visible: Thank you for getting > those ballot scripts working with the new platform! This looks really > painful and time consuming... Yes it was! But in two months we did not get API access so reverse engineering it is. What made it hard was that the new system does so much in javascript. Both the login system (it's a single site why does it need SAML?) and the ballot form itself (lots of asychronous stuff, animations, even a simple checkbox is hidden and implemented from scratch in javascript because reasons). So I could not just use selenium APIs (wasted a ton of time trying to figure out why). I started trying to emulate keypresses and mouse clicks but that proved too hard to get right. In the end I hit on the approach of injecting javascript into page to interact with the hidden form elements. Thanks, -- MST ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: ballot system back on 2024-06-06 19:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2024-06-07 3:43 ` Parav Pandit 2024-06-07 6:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Parav Pandit @ 2024-06-07 3:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael S. Tsirkin, Cornelia Huck; +Cc: virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> > Sent: Friday, June 7, 2024 1:26 AM > > On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 06:51:24PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 06 2024, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > So, things seem to be working, even if they are now a bit harder to > > > set up. > > > Let's start wrapping up 1.3? > > > I think we need to pack up and then do a ballot to ask OASIS to get > > > a special majority vote for us. > > > > > > Right? Cornelia, want to start that? > > > > I've now created a ballot to request a special majority vote; please > > double-check whether I got the incantations right. > > > > And because all that work is not really visible: Thank you for getting > > those ballot scripts working with the new platform! This looks really > > painful and time consuming... > > Yes it was! > But in two months we did not get API access so reverse engineering it is. > What made it hard was that the new system does so much in javascript. Both > the login system (it's a single site why does it need > SAML?) and the ballot form itself (lots of asychronous stuff, animations, even > a simple checkbox is hidden and implemented from scratch in javascript > because reasons). So I could not just use selenium APIs (wasted a ton of time > trying to figure out why). I started trying to emulate keypresses and mouse > clicks but that proved too hard to get right. In the end I hit on the approach > of injecting javascript into page to interact with the hidden form elements. > Thanks, > Thanks a lot Michael for the heavy lifting to get this operational. At least I didn't realize why the voting system needs such additional work specially when its upgraded. Is it for the github integration? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ballot system back on 2024-06-07 3:43 ` Parav Pandit @ 2024-06-07 6:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2024-06-07 6:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Parav Pandit; +Cc: Cornelia Huck, virtio-comment@lists.linux.dev On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 03:43:30AM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote: > > > > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> > > Sent: Friday, June 7, 2024 1:26 AM > > > > On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 06:51:24PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 06 2024, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > So, things seem to be working, even if they are now a bit harder to > > > > set up. > > > > Let's start wrapping up 1.3? > > > > I think we need to pack up and then do a ballot to ask OASIS to get > > > > a special majority vote for us. > > > > > > > > Right? Cornelia, want to start that? > > > > > > I've now created a ballot to request a special majority vote; please > > > double-check whether I got the incantations right. > > > > > > And because all that work is not really visible: Thank you for getting > > > those ballot scripts working with the new platform! This looks really > > > painful and time consuming... > > > > Yes it was! > > But in two months we did not get API access so reverse engineering it is. > > What made it hard was that the new system does so much in javascript. Both > > the login system (it's a single site why does it need > > SAML?) and the ballot form itself (lots of asychronous stuff, animations, even > > a simple checkbox is hidden and implemented from scratch in javascript > > because reasons). So I could not just use selenium APIs (wasted a ton of time > > trying to figure out why). I started trying to emulate keypresses and mouse > > clicks but that proved too hard to get right. In the end I hit on the approach > > of injecting javascript into page to interact with the hidden form elements. > > Thanks, > > > Thanks a lot Michael for the heavy lifting to get this operational. > At least I didn't realize why the voting system needs such additional work specially when its upgraded. > Is it for the github integration? Exactly. -- MST ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-06-07 6:32 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-06-06 12:23 ballot system back on Michael S. Tsirkin 2024-06-06 16:51 ` Cornelia Huck 2024-06-06 19:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2024-06-07 3:43 ` Parav Pandit 2024-06-07 6:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.