From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
Huichun Feng <foxhoundsk.tw@gmail.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: Adding arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline support for aarch64?
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2022 19:33:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ee5od601.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQJ9W99v-_P_zE+fPfnR45=jry7RxPNYRL1enYcKF547Hg@mail.gmail.com>
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 2:12 AM Huichun Feng <foxhoundsk.tw@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jean and the list,
>>
>> Attaching BPF to fentry/fexit hooks requires
>> arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(), which
>> AFAIK has only been implemented on x86. Is there any related ongoing patch for
>> aarch64?
>>
>> I've found a discussion [0] on this, and seems there has no further discussion.
>
> No patches have been posted since then.
> If you have cycles to pick up this work it would be awesome!
+1, would love to see this! :)
-Toke
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
Huichun Feng <foxhoundsk.tw@gmail.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: Adding arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline support for aarch64?
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2022 19:33:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ee5od601.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQJ9W99v-_P_zE+fPfnR45=jry7RxPNYRL1enYcKF547Hg@mail.gmail.com>
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 2:12 AM Huichun Feng <foxhoundsk.tw@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jean and the list,
>>
>> Attaching BPF to fentry/fexit hooks requires
>> arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(), which
>> AFAIK has only been implemented on x86. Is there any related ongoing patch for
>> aarch64?
>>
>> I've found a discussion [0] on this, and seems there has no further discussion.
>
> No patches have been posted since then.
> If you have cycles to pick up this work it would be awesome!
+1, would love to see this! :)
-Toke
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-03 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-28 16:02 Adding arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline support for aarch64? Huichun Feng
2021-12-28 16:02 ` Huichun Feng
2021-12-30 2:06 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-12-30 2:06 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-01-03 18:33 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2022-01-03 18:33 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ee5od601.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=foxhoundsk.tw@gmail.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.