From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, x86@kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] 5.13 i915/PAT regression on Brasswell, adding nopat to the kernel commandline worksaround this
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 12:28:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eee4fl17.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210512115736.GA10444@lst.de>
On Wed, 12 May 2021, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 01:15:03PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> IIRC it's because of 74ffa5a3e685 ("mm: add remap_pfn_range_notrack"),
>> which added a sanity check to make sure expectations were met. It turns
>> out they were not.
>>
>> The bug is not new, the warning is. AFAIK the i915 team is aware, but
>> other than that I've not followed.
>
>
> The actual culprit is b12d691ea5e0 ("i915: fix remap_io_sg to verify the
> pgprot"), but otherwise agreed. Someone the i915 maintainers all seem
> to be on vacation as the previous report did not manage to trigger any
> kind of reply.
We are aware. I've been rattling the cages to get more attention.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, x86@kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] 5.13 i915/PAT regression on Brasswell, adding nopat to the kernel commandline worksaround this
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 12:28:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eee4fl17.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210512115736.GA10444@lst.de>
On Wed, 12 May 2021, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 01:15:03PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> IIRC it's because of 74ffa5a3e685 ("mm: add remap_pfn_range_notrack"),
>> which added a sanity check to make sure expectations were met. It turns
>> out they were not.
>>
>> The bug is not new, the warning is. AFAIK the i915 team is aware, but
>> other than that I've not followed.
>
>
> The actual culprit is b12d691ea5e0 ("i915: fix remap_io_sg to verify the
> pgprot"), but otherwise agreed. Someone the i915 maintainers all seem
> to be on vacation as the previous report did not manage to trigger any
> kind of reply.
We are aware. I've been rattling the cages to get more attention.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-18 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-12 9:57 [Intel-gfx] 5.13 i915/PAT regression on Brasswell, adding nopat to the kernel commandline worksaround this Hans de Goede
2021-05-12 9:57 ` Hans de Goede
2021-05-12 11:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-12 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-12 11:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-12 11:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-12 12:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Hans de Goede
2021-05-12 12:36 ` Hans de Goede
2021-05-18 9:28 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2021-05-18 9:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87eee4fl17.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.