From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Juliet Kim <julietk@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: julietk@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] net/ibmvnic: prevent more than one thread from running in reset
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:12:39 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ef0ew2so.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190917171552.32498-3-julietk@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hi Juliet,
Juliet Kim <julietk@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> Signed-off-by: Juliet Kim <julietk@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> index ba340aaff1b3..f344ccd68ad9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> @@ -2054,6 +2054,13 @@ static void __ibmvnic_reset(struct work_struct *work)
>
> adapter = container_of(work, struct ibmvnic_adapter, ibmvnic_reset);
>
> + if (adapter->resetting) {
> + schedule_delayed_work(&adapter->ibmvnic_delayed_reset,
> + IBMVNIC_RESET_DELAY);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + adapter->resetting = true;
> reset_state = adapter->state;
Is there some locking/serialisation around this?
Otherwise that looks very racy. ie. two CPUs could both see
adapter->resetting == false, then both set it to true, and then continue
executing and stomp on each other.
cheers
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Juliet Kim <julietk@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: julietk@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] net/ibmvnic: prevent more than one thread from running in reset
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 16:12:39 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ef0ew2so.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190917171552.32498-3-julietk@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hi Juliet,
Juliet Kim <julietk@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> Signed-off-by: Juliet Kim <julietk@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> index ba340aaff1b3..f344ccd68ad9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> @@ -2054,6 +2054,13 @@ static void __ibmvnic_reset(struct work_struct *work)
>
> adapter = container_of(work, struct ibmvnic_adapter, ibmvnic_reset);
>
> + if (adapter->resetting) {
> + schedule_delayed_work(&adapter->ibmvnic_delayed_reset,
> + IBMVNIC_RESET_DELAY);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + adapter->resetting = true;
> reset_state = adapter->state;
Is there some locking/serialisation around this?
Otherwise that looks very racy. ie. two CPUs could both see
adapter->resetting == false, then both set it to true, and then continue
executing and stomp on each other.
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-18 6:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-17 17:15 [PATCH v3 0/2] net/ibmvnic: serialization fixes Juliet Kim
2019-09-17 17:15 ` Juliet Kim
2019-09-17 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] net/ibmvnic: unlock rtnl_lock in reset so linkwatch_event can run Juliet Kim
2019-09-17 17:15 ` Juliet Kim
2019-09-17 17:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] net/ibmvnic: prevent more than one thread from running in reset Juliet Kim
2019-09-17 17:15 ` Juliet Kim
2019-09-18 6:12 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2019-09-18 6:12 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-09-18 22:21 ` Juliet Kim
2019-09-18 22:21 ` Juliet Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ef0ew2so.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=julietk@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.