From: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [f2fs] 75cd4e098d: xfstests.generic.042.fail
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 08:17:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87egdyqjty.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <012001d143b4$6eca21d0$4c5e6570$@samsung.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2290 bytes --]
Hi, Yu,
Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com> writes:
> Hi Ying,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: kernel test robot [mailto:ying.huang(a)linux.intel.com]
>> Sent: Monday, December 28, 2015 9:40 AM
>> To: Chao Yu
>> Cc: lkp(a)01.org; LKML; Jaegeuk Kim
>> Subject: [lkp] [f2fs] 75cd4e098d: xfstests.generic.042.fail
>>
>> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>> commit 75cd4e098d178433436abce08146a21647bb4585 ("f2fs: support FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE")
>>
>> We found after your commit, the xfstests test case 009/042 failed.
>
> Thank you for the report, 042 is a known issue, IIRC, the reason is f2fs
> will flush inode page with last i_size in ioctl(F2FS_IOC_SHUTDOWN, 0x01),
> but 042 expects an zero-sized inode. So I supposed it happened due to the
> different semantics of metadata flushing between f2fs and xfs.
>
> For 009, I haven't saw it failed for long time, did you test with last f2fs?
We tested the specified commit, so you mean the latest f2fs-tools?
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
> Thanks,
>
>>
>> =========================================================================================
>> compiler/disk/fs/kconfig/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase:
>>
>> gcc-4.9/4HDD/f2fs/x86_64-rhel/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/vm-kbuild-4G/generic-quick/xfst
>> ests
>>
>> commit:
>> b4ace33703243fed56f8bfc80a001533acb9decb
>> 75cd4e098d178433436abce08146a21647bb4585
>>
>> b4ace33703243fed 75cd4e098d178433436abce081
>> ---------------- --------------------------
>> fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs
>> | | |
>> :18 94% 17:18 xfstests.generic.009.fail
>> :18 94% 17:18 xfstests.generic.042.fail
>>
>>
>> To reproduce:
>>
>> git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git
>> cd lkp-tests
>> bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email
>> bin/lkp run job.yaml
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ying Huang
>
> _______________________________________________
> LKP mailing list
> LKP(a)lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/lkp
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
Cc: "'Jaegeuk Kim'" <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, <lkp@01.org>,
"'LKML'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] 75cd4e098d: xfstests.generic.042.fail
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 08:17:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87egdyqjty.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <012001d143b4$6eca21d0$4c5e6570$@samsung.com> (Chao Yu's message of "Thu, 31 Dec 2015 18:16:37 +0800")
Hi, Yu,
Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com> writes:
> Hi Ying,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: kernel test robot [mailto:ying.huang@linux.intel.com]
>> Sent: Monday, December 28, 2015 9:40 AM
>> To: Chao Yu
>> Cc: lkp@01.org; LKML; Jaegeuk Kim
>> Subject: [lkp] [f2fs] 75cd4e098d: xfstests.generic.042.fail
>>
>> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>> commit 75cd4e098d178433436abce08146a21647bb4585 ("f2fs: support FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE")
>>
>> We found after your commit, the xfstests test case 009/042 failed.
>
> Thank you for the report, 042 is a known issue, IIRC, the reason is f2fs
> will flush inode page with last i_size in ioctl(F2FS_IOC_SHUTDOWN, 0x01),
> but 042 expects an zero-sized inode. So I supposed it happened due to the
> different semantics of metadata flushing between f2fs and xfs.
>
> For 009, I haven't saw it failed for long time, did you test with last f2fs?
We tested the specified commit, so you mean the latest f2fs-tools?
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
> Thanks,
>
>>
>> =========================================================================================
>> compiler/disk/fs/kconfig/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase:
>>
>> gcc-4.9/4HDD/f2fs/x86_64-rhel/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/vm-kbuild-4G/generic-quick/xfst
>> ests
>>
>> commit:
>> b4ace33703243fed56f8bfc80a001533acb9decb
>> 75cd4e098d178433436abce08146a21647bb4585
>>
>> b4ace33703243fed 75cd4e098d178433436abce081
>> ---------------- --------------------------
>> fail:runs %reproduction fail:runs
>> | | |
>> :18 94% 17:18 xfstests.generic.009.fail
>> :18 94% 17:18 xfstests.generic.042.fail
>>
>>
>> To reproduce:
>>
>> git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git
>> cd lkp-tests
>> bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email
>> bin/lkp run job.yaml
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ying Huang
>
> _______________________________________________
> LKP mailing list
> LKP@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/lkp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-04 0:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-28 1:39 [f2fs] 75cd4e098d: xfstests.generic.042.fail kernel test robot
2015-12-28 1:39 ` [lkp] " kernel test robot
2015-12-31 10:16 ` Chao Yu
2015-12-31 10:16 ` [lkp] " Chao Yu
2016-01-04 0:17 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2016-01-04 0:17 ` [LKP] " Huang, Ying
2016-01-04 1:12 ` Chao Yu
2016-01-04 1:12 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87egdyqjty.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.