From: Olaf Dietsche <olaf.dietsche#list.linux-kernel@t-online.de>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.name>
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] 2.5.42: remove capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO) check from open_kmem
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 19:00:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87elap80ft.fsf@goat.bogus.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200210171807.33178.oliver@neukum.name
Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.name> writes:
>> diff -urN a/drivers/char/mem.c b/drivers/char/mem.c
>> --- a/drivers/char/mem.c Sat Oct 5 18:44:55 2002
>> +++ b/drivers/char/mem.c Thu Oct 17 16:02:56 2002
>> @@ -525,7 +525,7 @@
>>
>> static int open_port(struct inode * inode, struct file * filp)
>> {
>> - return capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO) ? 0 : -EPERM;
>> + return capable(CAP_SYS_KMEM) ? 0 : -EPERM;
>
> return capable(CAP_SYS_KMEM) && capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO) ? 0 : _EPERM;
>
> Unless you check for RAWIO you can gain RAWIO by illegitimate means.
It's embarrassing, but it took until now for me to realize, that this
tries to protect CAP_SYS_RAWIO and not /dev/kmem. Well, thanks for
being patient with me.
> Now whether one place justifies a whole capability is another question.
This is unnecessary then.
Regards, Olaf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-17 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-13 12:46 [PATCH][RFC] 2.5.42: remove capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO) check from open_kmem Olaf Dietsche
2002-10-17 11:00 ` Olaf Dietsche
2002-10-17 11:32 ` Chris Evans
2002-10-17 12:30 ` Chris Wright
2002-10-17 14:14 ` Olaf Dietsche
[not found] ` <200210171807.33178.oliver@neukum.name>
2002-10-17 17:00 ` Olaf Dietsche [this message]
[not found] <3DA985E6.6090302@colorfullife.com>
2002-10-13 15:48 ` Olaf Dietsche
[not found] ` <3DA99A8B.5050102@colorfullife.com>
2002-10-13 16:45 ` Olaf Dietsche
2002-10-13 17:04 ` Manfred Spraul
2002-10-13 22:05 ` Olaf Dietsche
2002-10-17 11:42 ` Andreas Steinmetz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87elap80ft.fsf@goat.bogus.local \
--to=olaf.dietsche#list.linux-kernel@t-online.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.name \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.