All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	pjones@redhat.com, deller@gmx.de, ardb@kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] firmware/sysfb: Update screen_info for relocated EFI framebuffers
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:52:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fryguzjy.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240117125527.23324-8-tzimmermann@suse.de>

Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> writes:

> On ARM PCI systems, the PCI hierarchy might be reconfigured during
> boot and the firmware framebuffer might move as a result of that.
> The values in screen_info will then be invalid.
>
> Work around this problem by tracking the framebuffer's initial
> location before it get relocated; then fix the screen_info state
> between reloaction and creating the firmware framebuffer's device.
>
> This functionality has been lifted from efifb. See the commit message
> of commit 55d728a40d36 ("efi/fb: Avoid reconfiguration of BAR that
> covers the framebuffer") for more information.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
> ---

[...]

>  #if defined(CONFIG_PCI)

Shouldn't this be && !defined(CONFIG_X86) ? Or maybe &&
defined(CONFIG_ARM64), although I don't know if the same
also applies to other EFI platforms (e.g: CONFIG_RISCV).

Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	pjones@redhat.com, deller@gmx.de, ardb@kernel.org
Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] firmware/sysfb: Update screen_info for relocated EFI framebuffers
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:52:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fryguzjy.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240117125527.23324-8-tzimmermann@suse.de>

Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> writes:

> On ARM PCI systems, the PCI hierarchy might be reconfigured during
> boot and the firmware framebuffer might move as a result of that.
> The values in screen_info will then be invalid.
>
> Work around this problem by tracking the framebuffer's initial
> location before it get relocated; then fix the screen_info state
> between reloaction and creating the firmware framebuffer's device.
>
> This functionality has been lifted from efifb. See the commit message
> of commit 55d728a40d36 ("efi/fb: Avoid reconfiguration of BAR that
> covers the framebuffer") for more information.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
> ---

[...]

>  #if defined(CONFIG_PCI)

Shouldn't this be && !defined(CONFIG_X86) ? Or maybe &&
defined(CONFIG_ARM64), although I don't know if the same
also applies to other EFI platforms (e.g: CONFIG_RISCV).

Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat


  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-29 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-17 12:39 [PATCH 0/8] firmware/sysfb: Track parent device for screen_info Thomas Zimmermann
2024-01-17 12:39 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-01-17 12:39 ` [PATCH 1/8] video: Add helpers for decoding screen_info Thomas Zimmermann
2024-01-17 12:39   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-01-29 10:41   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-01-29 10:41     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-01-30 13:12     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-01-30 13:12       ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-01-17 12:39 ` [PATCH 2/8] video: Provide screen_info_get_pci_dev() to find screen_info's PCI device Thomas Zimmermann
2024-01-17 12:39   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-01-29 11:04   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-01-29 11:04     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-01-30 10:12     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-01-30 10:12       ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-01-30 10:23       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-01-30 10:23         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-01-17 12:39 ` [PATCH 3/8] firmware/sysfb: Set firmware-framebuffer parent device Thomas Zimmermann
2024-01-17 12:39   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-01-29 11:28   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-01-29 11:28     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-01-17 12:39 ` [PATCH 4/8] fbdev/efifb: Remove PM for " Thomas Zimmermann
2024-01-17 12:39   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-01-29 11:30   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-01-29 11:30     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-01-17 12:39 ` [PATCH 5/8] firmware/sysfb: Create firmware device only for enabled PCI devices Thomas Zimmermann
2024-01-17 12:39   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-01-29 11:36   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-01-29 11:36     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-01-30 12:52     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-01-30 12:52       ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-01-17 12:39 ` [PATCH 6/8] fbdev/efifb: Do not track parent device status Thomas Zimmermann
2024-01-17 12:39   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-01-29 11:38   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-01-29 11:38     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-01-17 12:39 ` [PATCH 7/8] firmware/sysfb: Update screen_info for relocated EFI framebuffers Thomas Zimmermann
2024-01-17 12:39   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-01-29 11:52   ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message]
2024-01-29 11:52     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-01-29 12:03     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-01-29 12:03       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-01-17 12:39 ` [PATCH 8/8] fbdev/efifb: Remove framebuffer relocation tracking Thomas Zimmermann
2024-01-17 12:39   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-01-29 12:03   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2024-01-29 12:03     ` Javier Martinez Canillas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fryguzjy.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set \
    --to=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.