All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [PATCH 03/14] ASoC/SOF/core: Ensure sof_ops_free() is still called when probe never ran.
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2023 10:58:16 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fs2sgmsn.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231002193847.7134-3-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, 02 Oct 2023, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
>
> In an effort to not call sof_ops_free twice, we stopped running it when
> probe was aborted.
>
> Check the result of cancel_work_sync to see if this was the case.
>
> Fixes: 31bb7bd9ffee ("ASoC: SOF: core: Only call sof_ops_free() on remove if the probe was successful")
> Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

IMO this and the subsequent patches need either

- cherry-pick -x annotation for patches that have already been merged to
  upstream trees

or

- Link: tag pointing at the patches on upstream mailing list for patches
  that haven't been merged yet


BR,
Jani.


> ---
>  sound/soc/sof/core.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/core.c b/sound/soc/sof/core.c
> index 2d1616b81485..0938b259f703 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/sof/core.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/sof/core.c
> @@ -459,9 +459,10 @@ int snd_sof_device_remove(struct device *dev)
>  	struct snd_sof_dev *sdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  	struct snd_sof_pdata *pdata = sdev->pdata;
>  	int ret;
> +	bool aborted = false;
>  
>  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SND_SOC_SOF_PROBE_WORK_QUEUE))
> -		cancel_work_sync(&sdev->probe_work);
> +		aborted = cancel_work_sync(&sdev->probe_work);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Unregister any registered client device first before IPC and debugfs
> @@ -487,6 +488,9 @@ int snd_sof_device_remove(struct device *dev)
>  		snd_sof_free_debug(sdev);
>  		snd_sof_remove(sdev);
>  		sof_ops_free(sdev);
> +	} else if (aborted) {
> +		/* probe_work never ran */
> +		sof_ops_free(sdev);
>  	}
>  
>  	/* release firmware */

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-03  7:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-02 19:38 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 01/14] Revert "sound/soc/sof: Remove deferred probe for SOF" maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 02/14] Revert "sound/hda: Allow XE as i915 replacement for sound" maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 03/14] ASoC/SOF/core: Ensure sof_ops_free() is still called when probe never ran maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-03  7:58   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 04/14] ASoC: SOF: core: Add probe_early and remove_late callbacks maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 05/14] ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda: start splitting the probe maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 06/14] ALSA: hda/intel: Fix error handling in azx_probe() maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 07/14] ALSA: hda/i915: Allow override of gpu binding maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 08/14] ALSA: hda/i915: Add an allow_modprobe argument to snd_hdac_i915_init maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 09/14] ALSA: hda/i915: Allow xe as match for i915_component_master_match maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 10/14] ASoC: Intel: avs: Move snd_hdac_i915_init to before probe_work maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 11/14] ALSA: hda/intel: " maarten.lankhorst
2023-11-14 11:06   ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-11-14 11:06     ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-11-14 11:06     ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2023-11-14 12:35     ` Jani Nikula
2023-11-14 12:35       ` Jani Nikula
2023-11-14 12:35       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2023-11-14 13:29       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2023-11-14 13:29         ` Maarten Lankhorst
2023-11-14 13:29         ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2023-11-14 13:31         ` Saarinen, Jani
2023-11-14 13:31           ` Saarinen, Jani
2023-11-14 13:31           ` [Intel-gfx] " Saarinen, Jani
2023-11-14 16:52           ` Takashi Iwai
2023-11-14 16:52             ` Takashi Iwai
2023-11-14 16:52             ` [Intel-gfx] " Takashi Iwai
2023-11-14 17:24             ` Jani Nikula
2023-11-14 17:24               ` Jani Nikula
2023-11-14 17:24               ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2023-11-15  8:15             ` Kai Vehmanen
2023-11-15  8:15               ` Kai Vehmanen
2023-11-15  8:15               ` [Intel-gfx] " Kai Vehmanen
2023-11-14 13:39       ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-11-14 13:39         ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-11-14 13:39         ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2023-11-14 14:39         ` Maarten Lankhorst
2023-11-14 14:39           ` Maarten Lankhorst
2023-11-14 14:39           ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2023-11-14 15:50           ` Takashi Iwai
2023-11-14 15:50             ` Takashi Iwai
2023-11-14 15:50             ` [Intel-gfx] " Takashi Iwai
2023-11-14 15:52             ` Maarten Lankhorst
2023-11-14 15:52               ` Maarten Lankhorst
2023-11-14 15:52               ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2023-11-14 15:09     ` Takashi Iwai
2023-11-14 15:09       ` Takashi Iwai
2023-11-14 15:09       ` [Intel-gfx] " Takashi Iwai
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 12/14] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: " maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 13/14] ASoC: SOF: Intel: Move binding to display driver outside of deferred probe maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-02 19:38 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 14/14] ALSA: hda/i915: Remove extra argument from snd_hdac_i915_init maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-02 20:28 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for series starting with [01/14] Revert "sound/soc/sof: Remove deferred probe for SOF" Patchwork
2023-10-03 10:50 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success " Patchwork
2023-10-03 10:50 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2023-10-03 10:51 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2023-10-03 10:58 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-10-03 10:59 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2023-10-03 11:00 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2023-10-03 11:37 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2023-11-14 16:30 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for series starting with [01/14] Revert "sound/soc/sof: Remove deferred probe for SOF" (rev3) Patchwork
2023-11-15 23:27 ` [Intel-xe] ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for series starting with [01/14] Revert "sound/soc/sof: Remove deferred probe for SOF" (rev4) Patchwork
2023-11-17 21:33 ` Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-10-03 12:00 [Intel-xe] [PATCH 00/14] Update sound patches to upstreamable versions maarten.lankhorst
2023-10-03 12:00 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH 03/14] ASoC/SOF/core: Ensure sof_ops_free() is still called when probe never ran maarten.lankhorst

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fs2sgmsn.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.