Status of luminous v12.2.1 integration branch

Status of luminous v12.2.1 integration branch

[Yuri Weinstein]

This email is an attempt to make sure that all are clear on luminous
v12.2.1 release status.

Dev leads - what is left before we can start QE validation?

Thx
YuriW

Re: Status of luminous v12.2.1 integration branch

[Sage Weil]

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/17674 needs to go through rgw suite and 
get merged!
THanks-


On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Yuri Weinstein wrote:

> This email is an attempt to make sure that all are clear on luminous
> v12.2.1 release status.
> 
> Dev leads - what is left before we can start QE validation?
> 
> Thx
> YuriW
> 
> 

Re: Status of luminous v12.2.1 integration branch

[Yuri Weinstein]

Sage
I will test 17674, anything else for rgw?

Thx
YuriW

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Sage Weil <sweil@redhat.com> wrote:
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/17674 needs to go through rgw suite and
> get merged!
> THanks-
>
>
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
>
>> This email is an attempt to make sure that all are clear on luminous
>> v12.2.1 release status.
>>
>> Dev leads - what is left before we can start QE validation?
>>
>> Thx
>> YuriW
>>
>>

Re: Status of luminous v12.2.1 integration branch

[Orit Wasserman]

Trying again hopefully won't be considered a virus this time ..

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
> Sage
> I will test 17674, anything else for rgw?
>

We need https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/17484 to fix the rgw suite.

Thanks,
Orit

> Thx
> YuriW
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Sage Weil <sweil@redhat.com> wrote:
>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/17674 needs to go through rgw suite and
>> get merged!
>> THanks-
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
>>
>>> This email is an attempt to make sure that all are clear on luminous
>>> v12.2.1 release status.
>>>
>>> Dev leads - what is left before we can start QE validation?
>>>
>>> Thx
>>> YuriW
>>>
>>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Status of luminous v12.2.1 integration branch

[Jason Dillaman]

RBD should be good-to-go

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
> This email is an attempt to make sure that all are clear on luminous
> v12.2.1 release status.
>
> Dev leads - what is left before we can start QE validation?
>
> Thx
> YuriW
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Jason

Re: Status of luminous v12.2.1 integration branch

[Patrick Donnelly]

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
> This email is an attempt to make sure that all are clear on luminous
> v12.2.1 release status.
>
> Dev leads - what is left before we can start QE validation?

To be merged into master today and then backported:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21378
Luminous backport: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21357
To be merged into master today and then backported:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/20594

-- 
Patrick Donnelly

Re: Status of luminous v12.2.1 integration branch

[Patrick Donnelly]

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
>> This email is an attempt to make sure that all are clear on luminous
>> v12.2.1 release status.
>>
>> Dev leads - what is left before we can start QE validation?
>
> To be merged into master today and then backported:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21378
> Luminous backport: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21357
> To be merged into master today and then backported:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/20594

Final list of CephFS backports needed for 12.2.1:

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21323
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21114
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21107
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21357
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21322
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21384

-- 
Patrick Donnelly

Re: Status of luminous v12.2.1 integration branch

[Abhishek Lekshmanan]

Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@redhat.com> writes:

> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> This email is an attempt to make sure that all are clear on luminous
>>> v12.2.1 release status.
>>>
>>> Dev leads - what is left before we can start QE validation?
>>
>> To be merged into master today and then backported:
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21378
>> Luminous backport: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21357
>> To be merged into master today and then backported:
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/20594
>
> Final list of CephFS backports needed for 12.2.1:
>
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21323
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21114
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21107
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21357
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21322
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21384
>

So scheduled the relevant suites (rgw,rados,fs) at priority 100 right
now) for the current PRs targeting Luminous, 
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21296#note-15

if this run goes through, lets merge these PRs to luminous and handover
to Yuri

-- 
Abhishek Lekshmanan
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

Re: Status of luminous v12.2.1 integration branch

[Abhishek Lekshmanan]

Abhishek Lekshmanan <abhishek@suse.com> writes:

> Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> This email is an attempt to make sure that all are clear on luminous
>>>> v12.2.1 release status.
>>>>
>>>> Dev leads - what is left before we can start QE validation?
>>>
>>> To be merged into master today and then backported:
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21378
>>> Luminous backport: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21357
>>> To be merged into master today and then backported:
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/20594
>>
>> Final list of CephFS backports needed for 12.2.1:
>>
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21323
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21114
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21107
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21357
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21322
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21384
>>
>
> So scheduled the relevant suites (rgw,rados,fs) at priority 100 right
> now) for the current PRs targeting Luminous, 
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21296#note-15
>
> if this run goes through, lets merge these PRs to luminous and handover
> to Yuri

So had failures in many jobs of all the 3 suites due to an ansible
failure, the fs suite, however, has a few failures in this test
(tasks.cephfs.test_misc.TestMisc), is anyone aware of prior failures of
this suite, can be seen in this run for eg.

http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2017-09-14_11:23:49-fs-wip-luminous-2017-09-14-distro-basic-smithi/1632469/

reruns updated at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21296 

--
Abhishek Lekshmanan
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

Re: Status of luminous v12.2.1 integration branch

[Abhishek Lekshmanan]

Abhishek Lekshmanan <abhishek@suse.com> writes:

> Abhishek Lekshmanan <abhishek@suse.com> writes:
>
>> Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>> This email is an attempt to make sure that all are clear on luminous
>>>>> v12.2.1 release status.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dev leads - what is left before we can start QE validation?
>>>>
>>>> To be merged into master today and then backported:
>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21378
>>>> Luminous backport: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21357
>>>> To be merged into master today and then backported:
>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/20594
>>>
>>> Final list of CephFS backports needed for 12.2.1:
>>>
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21323
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21114
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21107
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21357
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21322
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21384
>>>
>>
>> So scheduled the relevant suites (rgw,rados,fs) at priority 100 right
>> now) for the current PRs targeting Luminous, 
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21296#note-15
>>
>> if this run goes through, lets merge these PRs to luminous and handover
>> to Yuri
>
> So had failures in many jobs of all the 3 suites due to an ansible
> failure, the fs suite, however, has a few failures in this test
> (tasks.cephfs.test_misc.TestMisc), is anyone aware of prior failures of
> this suite, can be seen in this run for eg.
>
> http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2017-09-14_11:23:49-fs-wip-luminous-2017-09-14-distro-basic-smithi/1632469/
>
> reruns updated at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21296 

The cephfs reruns besides the ansible failure failed again at the same
test suite (tasks.cephfs.test_misc) , seen at

http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2017-09-15_08:41:20-fs-wip-luminous-2017-09-14-distro-basic-smithi/

RADOS suite saw a failure at
http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2017-09-15_08:47:22-rados-wip-luminous-2017-09-14-distro-basic-smithi/1635585/

on  (workunit test cephtool/test.sh), other than the same ansible
related env. failures. 


both RGW suite saw a few ansible failures again, but no other
failures, so let us deem these as passed for now? (Yuri also ran another suite
with RGW and these too had only the ansible failures again). In which
case we can merge the staged PRs and handover to Yuri for the final QE.

Sage, Patrick, Yehuda/Orit thoughts?

-- 
Abhishek Lekshmanan
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton,
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

Re: Status of luminous v12.2.1 integration branch

[Josh Durgin]

On 09/15/2017 05:04 AM, Abhishek Lekshmanan wrote:
> RADOS suite saw a failure at
> http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2017-09-15_08:47:22-rados-wip-luminous-2017-09-14-distro-basic-smithi/1635585/
> 
> on  (workunit test cephtool/test.sh), other than the same ansible
> related env. failures.

This was a timeout checking the crush rule during pool creation - it's
safe to ignore.

It seems that https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/17179 did not eliminate
the problem.

Josh

Re: Status of luminous v12.2.1 integration branch

[Patrick Donnelly]

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 1:54 AM, Abhishek Lekshmanan <abhishek@suse.com> wrote:
> So had failures in many jobs of all the 3 suites due to an ansible
> failure, the fs suite, however, has a few failures in this test
> (tasks.cephfs.test_misc.TestMisc), is anyone aware of prior failures of
> this suite, can be seen in this run for eg.
>
> http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2017-09-14_11:23:49-fs-wip-luminous-2017-09-14-distro-basic-smithi/1632469/

That fs failure is known and can be ignored:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21381

-- 
Patrick Donnelly

Re: Status of luminous v12.2.1 integration branch

[Abhishek L]

Merged all the pending PRs that went through the run yesterday,

Josh, Sage, Patrick, Yehuda are we good to go for the final QE?

(We already had Jason's  approval, and #17764 & #17484 as Orit
requested were already merged for RGW)

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 1:54 AM, Abhishek Lekshmanan <abhishek@suse.com> wrote:
>> So had failures in many jobs of all the 3 suites due to an ansible
>> failure, the fs suite, however, has a few failures in this test
>> (tasks.cephfs.test_misc.TestMisc), is anyone aware of prior failures of
>> this suite, can be seen in this run for eg.
>>
>> http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2017-09-14_11:23:49-fs-wip-luminous-2017-09-14-distro-basic-smithi/1632469/
>
> That fs failure is known and can be ignored:
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21381
>
> --
> Patrick Donnelly
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Status of luminous v12.2.1 integration branch

[Patrick Donnelly]

CephFS is ready!

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Abhishek L
<abhishek.lekshmanan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Merged all the pending PRs that went through the run yesterday,
>
> Josh, Sage, Patrick, Yehuda are we good to go for the final QE?
>
> (We already had Jason's  approval, and #17764 & #17484 as Orit
> requested were already merged for RGW)
>
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 1:54 AM, Abhishek Lekshmanan <abhishek@suse.com> wrote:
>>> So had failures in many jobs of all the 3 suites due to an ansible
>>> failure, the fs suite, however, has a few failures in this test
>>> (tasks.cephfs.test_misc.TestMisc), is anyone aware of prior failures of
>>> this suite, can be seen in this run for eg.
>>>
>>> http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2017-09-14_11:23:49-fs-wip-luminous-2017-09-14-distro-basic-smithi/1632469/
>>
>> That fs failure is known and can be ignored:
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21381
>>
>> --
>> Patrick Donnelly
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Patrick Donnelly

Re: Status of luminous v12.2.1 integration branch

[Joao Eduardo Luis]

On 09/13/2017 04:40 PM, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
> This email is an attempt to make sure that all are clear on luminous
> v12.2.1 release status.
> 
> Dev leads - what is left before we can start QE validation?

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21309 needs to go in on the monitors.

   -Joao

Re: Status of luminous v12.2.1 integration branch

[Abhishek L]

Yuri,
Sage also acked on IRC, lets start the QE round for 12.2.1 at the
current luminous branch

(sha1 ddf84249fa8a8ec3655c39bac5331ab81c0307b1)

Best,
Abhishek


On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 11:17 PM, Josh Durgin <jdurgin@redhat.com> wrote:
> Good to go for rados!
>
>
> Sent from Nine
> ________________________________
> From: Abhishek L <abhishek.lekshmanan@gmail.com>
> Sent: Sep 15, 2017 1:50 PM
> To: Patrick Donnelly
> Cc: Abhishek Lekshmanan; Yuri Weinstein; Development, Ceph; Weil, Sage;
> Durgin, Josh; Sadeh-Weinraub, Yehuda; John Spray; gmeno@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: Status of luminous v12.2.1 integration branch
>
> Merged all the pending PRs that went through the run yesterday,
>
> Josh, Sage, Patrick, Yehuda are we good to go for the final QE?
>
> (We already had Jason's  approval, and #17764 & #17484 as Orit
> requested were already merged for RGW)
>
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 1:54 AM, Abhishek Lekshmanan <abhishek@suse.com>
>> wrote:
>>> So had failures in many jobs of all the 3 suites due to an ansible
>>> failure, the fs suite, however, has a few failures in this test
>>> (tasks.cephfs.test_misc.TestMisc), is anyone aware of prior failures of
>>> this suite, can be seen in this run for eg.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2017-09-14_11:23:49-fs-wip-luminous-2017-09-14-distro-basic-smithi/1632469/
>>
>> That fs failure is known and can be ignored:
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21381
>>
>> --
>> Patrick Donnelly
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Status of luminous v12.2.1 integration branch

[Yuri Weinstein]

Abhishek

Starting !

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Abhishek L
<abhishek.lekshmanan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yuri,
> Sage also acked on IRC, lets start the QE round for 12.2.1 at the
> current luminous branch
>
> (sha1 ddf84249fa8a8ec3655c39bac5331ab81c0307b1)
>
> Best,
> Abhishek
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 11:17 PM, Josh Durgin <jdurgin@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Good to go for rados!
>>
>>
>> Sent from Nine
>> ________________________________
>> From: Abhishek L <abhishek.lekshmanan@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Sep 15, 2017 1:50 PM
>> To: Patrick Donnelly
>> Cc: Abhishek Lekshmanan; Yuri Weinstein; Development, Ceph; Weil, Sage;
>> Durgin, Josh; Sadeh-Weinraub, Yehuda; John Spray; gmeno@redhat.com
>> Subject: Re: Status of luminous v12.2.1 integration branch
>>
>> Merged all the pending PRs that went through the run yesterday,
>>
>> Josh, Sage, Patrick, Yehuda are we good to go for the final QE?
>>
>> (We already had Jason's  approval, and #17764 & #17484 as Orit
>> requested were already merged for RGW)
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 1:54 AM, Abhishek Lekshmanan <abhishek@suse.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> So had failures in many jobs of all the 3 suites due to an ansible
>>>> failure, the fs suite, however, has a few failures in this test
>>>> (tasks.cephfs.test_misc.TestMisc), is anyone aware of prior failures of
>>>> this suite, can be seen in this run for eg.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://pulpito.ceph.com/abhi-2017-09-14_11:23:49-fs-wip-luminous-2017-09-14-distro-basic-smithi/1632469/
>>>
>>> That fs failure is known and can be ignored:
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21381
>>>
>>> --
>>> Patrick Donnelly
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html