* [ath10k] [batman-adv] Robustness of batman-adv or IBSS/802.11s on ath9k (AR9331 chip)
@ 2017-04-22 5:16 ` Xuebing Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Xuebing Wang @ 2017-04-22 5:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n, openwrt-devel, Sven Eckelmann, Simon Wunderlich
Hi ath10k community,
Does anyone use ath9k driver + 802.11s (or IBSS/adhoc) on commercial
products?
Our setup is AR9331 + ath9k driver + OpenWRT 15.05 + batman-adv 2016.1
(PKG_RELEASE:=3)
We are very serious about robustness of running batman-adv on AR9331,
because we have 20+ commercial sites running, each site is with about 20
nodes.
- batman-adv + ar9331 work almost (well almost) perfectly.
- Sometimes, one node drops off the mesh, occurrence rate is very low.
- For one time, when Node drops off the mesh, "rmmod ath9k" then
"modprobe ath9k" can get both batman-adv (and ibss/adhoc on top of
ath9k) recover. This seemingly points to that the issue is with ath9k
driver (ibss/adhoc mode).
As this email is mainly addressed to ath10k community (rather than
batman-adv or openwrt), does anyone commercially use 802.11s (or
ibss/adhoc)+ ath9k/ath10k? Does 802.11s (or ibss/adhoc) + ath9k/ath10k
work perfectly?
Thanks.
Xuebing Wang
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [ath10k] [batman-adv] Robustness of batman-adv or IBSS/802.11s on ath9k (AR9331 chip)
@ 2017-04-22 5:16 ` Xuebing Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Xuebing Wang @ 2017-04-22 5:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ath10k@lists.infradead.org; +Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n, openwrt-devel
Hi ath10k community,
Does anyone use ath9k driver + 802.11s (or IBSS/adhoc) on commercial
products?
Our setup is AR9331 + ath9k driver + OpenWRT 15.05 + batman-adv 2016.1
(PKG_RELEASE:=3)
We are very serious about robustness of running batman-adv on AR9331,
because we have 20+ commercial sites running, each site is with about 20
nodes.
- batman-adv + ar9331 work almost (well almost) perfectly.
- Sometimes, one node drops off the mesh, occurrence rate is very low.
- For one time, when Node drops off the mesh, "rmmod ath9k" then
"modprobe ath9k" can get both batman-adv (and ibss/adhoc on top of
ath9k) recover. This seemingly points to that the issue is with ath9k
driver (ibss/adhoc mode).
As this email is mainly addressed to ath10k community (rather than
batman-adv or openwrt), does anyone commercially use 802.11s (or
ibss/adhoc)+ ath9k/ath10k? Does 802.11s (or ibss/adhoc) + ath9k/ath10k
work perfectly?
Thanks.
Xuebing Wang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [ath10k] [batman-adv] Robustness of batman-adv or IBSS/802.11s on ath9k (AR9331 chip)
2017-04-22 5:16 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] " Xuebing Wang
@ 2017-04-22 8:55 ` Russell Senior
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Russell Senior @ 2017-04-22 8:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xuebing Wang
Cc: Sven Eckelmann, b.a.t.m.a.n, openwrt-devel,
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
>>>>> "Xuebing" == Xuebing Wang <xbing6@gmail.com> writes:
Xuebing> Hi ath10k community, Does anyone use ath9k driver + 802.11s (or
Xuebing> IBSS/adhoc) on commercial products?
Xuebing> Our setup is AR9331 + ath9k driver + OpenWRT 15.05 + batman-adv
Xuebing> 2016.1 (PKG_RELEASE:=3)
Xuebing> We are very serious about robustness of running batman-adv on
Xuebing> AR9331, because we have 20+ commercial sites running, each site
Xuebing> is with about 20 nodes. - batman-adv + ar9331 work almost
Xuebing> (well almost) perfectly. - Sometimes, one node drops off the
Xuebing> mesh, occurrence rate is very low. - For one time, when Node
Xuebing> drops off the mesh, "rmmod ath9k" then "modprobe ath9k" can get
Xuebing> both batman-adv (and ibss/adhoc on top of ath9k) recover. This
Xuebing> seemingly points to that the issue is with ath9k driver
Xuebing> (ibss/adhoc mode).
I'm running batman-adv on LEDE-project (r1497) on a TP-Link TP-WDR3600
with ibss/adhoc + ap on the 2.4GHz radio. This is ath9k, not ath10k.
Seems to work fine, no problems.
--
Russell Senior, President
russell@personaltelco.net
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [OpenWrt-Devel] [ath10k] [batman-adv] Robustness of batman-adv or IBSS/802.11s on ath9k (AR9331 chip)
@ 2017-04-22 8:55 ` Russell Senior
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Russell Senior @ 2017-04-22 8:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xuebing Wang; +Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n, openwrt-devel, ath10k@lists.infradead.org
>>>>> "Xuebing" == Xuebing Wang <xbing6@gmail.com> writes:
Xuebing> Hi ath10k community, Does anyone use ath9k driver + 802.11s (or
Xuebing> IBSS/adhoc) on commercial products?
Xuebing> Our setup is AR9331 + ath9k driver + OpenWRT 15.05 + batman-adv
Xuebing> 2016.1 (PKG_RELEASE:=3)
Xuebing> We are very serious about robustness of running batman-adv on
Xuebing> AR9331, because we have 20+ commercial sites running, each site
Xuebing> is with about 20 nodes. - batman-adv + ar9331 work almost
Xuebing> (well almost) perfectly. - Sometimes, one node drops off the
Xuebing> mesh, occurrence rate is very low. - For one time, when Node
Xuebing> drops off the mesh, "rmmod ath9k" then "modprobe ath9k" can get
Xuebing> both batman-adv (and ibss/adhoc on top of ath9k) recover. This
Xuebing> seemingly points to that the issue is with ath9k driver
Xuebing> (ibss/adhoc mode).
I'm running batman-adv on LEDE-project (r1497) on a TP-Link TP-WDR3600
with ibss/adhoc + ap on the 2.4GHz radio. This is ath9k, not ath10k.
Seems to work fine, no problems.
--
Russell Senior, President
russell@personaltelco.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [ath10k] [batman-adv] Robustness of batman-adv or IBSS/802.11s on ath9k (AR9331 chip)
2017-04-22 8:55 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] " Russell Senior
@ 2017-04-22 9:12 ` Xuebing Wang
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Xuebing Wang @ 2017-04-22 9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Russell Senior
Cc: Sven Eckelmann, b.a.t.m.a.n, openwrt-devel,
ath10k@lists.infradead.org, Simon Wunderlich
On 2017年04月22日 16:55, Russell Senior wrote:
>>>>>> "Xuebing" == Xuebing Wang <xbing6@gmail.com> writes:
> Xuebing> Hi ath10k community, Does anyone use ath9k driver + 802.11s (or
> Xuebing> IBSS/adhoc) on commercial products?
>
> Xuebing> Our setup is AR9331 + ath9k driver + OpenWRT 15.05 + batman-adv
> Xuebing> 2016.1 (PKG_RELEASE:=3)
>
> Xuebing> We are very serious about robustness of running batman-adv on
> Xuebing> AR9331, because we have 20+ commercial sites running, each site
> Xuebing> is with about 20 nodes. - batman-adv + ar9331 work almost
> Xuebing> (well almost) perfectly. - Sometimes, one node drops off the
> Xuebing> mesh, occurrence rate is very low. - For one time, when Node
> Xuebing> drops off the mesh, "rmmod ath9k" then "modprobe ath9k" can get
> Xuebing> both batman-adv (and ibss/adhoc on top of ath9k) recover. This
> Xuebing> seemingly points to that the issue is with ath9k driver
> Xuebing> (ibss/adhoc mode).
>
> I'm running batman-adv on LEDE-project (r1497) on a TP-Link TP-WDR3600
> with ibss/adhoc + ap on the 2.4GHz radio. This is ath9k, not ath10k.
> Seems to work fine, no problems.
Hi Russel,
Thanks. By "work fine", do you mean that you have 20+ nodes running for
at least a month without any issues?
Xuebing Wang
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [OpenWrt-Devel] [ath10k] [batman-adv] Robustness of batman-adv or IBSS/802.11s on ath9k (AR9331 chip)
@ 2017-04-22 9:12 ` Xuebing Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Xuebing Wang @ 2017-04-22 9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Russell Senior; +Cc: b.a.t.m.a.n, openwrt-devel, ath10k@lists.infradead.org
On 2017年04月22日 16:55, Russell Senior wrote:
>>>>>> "Xuebing" == Xuebing Wang <xbing6@gmail.com> writes:
> Xuebing> Hi ath10k community, Does anyone use ath9k driver + 802.11s (or
> Xuebing> IBSS/adhoc) on commercial products?
>
> Xuebing> Our setup is AR9331 + ath9k driver + OpenWRT 15.05 + batman-adv
> Xuebing> 2016.1 (PKG_RELEASE:=3)
>
> Xuebing> We are very serious about robustness of running batman-adv on
> Xuebing> AR9331, because we have 20+ commercial sites running, each site
> Xuebing> is with about 20 nodes. - batman-adv + ar9331 work almost
> Xuebing> (well almost) perfectly. - Sometimes, one node drops off the
> Xuebing> mesh, occurrence rate is very low. - For one time, when Node
> Xuebing> drops off the mesh, "rmmod ath9k" then "modprobe ath9k" can get
> Xuebing> both batman-adv (and ibss/adhoc on top of ath9k) recover. This
> Xuebing> seemingly points to that the issue is with ath9k driver
> Xuebing> (ibss/adhoc mode).
>
> I'm running batman-adv on LEDE-project (r1497) on a TP-Link TP-WDR3600
> with ibss/adhoc + ap on the 2.4GHz radio. This is ath9k, not ath10k.
> Seems to work fine, no problems.
Hi Russel,
Thanks. By "work fine", do you mean that you have 20+ nodes running for
at least a month without any issues?
Xuebing Wang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-04-22 9:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-04-22 5:16 [ath10k] [batman-adv] Robustness of batman-adv or IBSS/802.11s on ath9k (AR9331 chip) Xuebing Wang
2017-04-22 5:16 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] " Xuebing Wang
2017-04-22 8:55 ` [OpenWrt-Devel] " Russell Senior
2017-04-22 8:55 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] " Russell Senior
2017-04-22 9:12 ` Xuebing Wang
2017-04-22 9:12 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] " Xuebing Wang
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.