From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de>
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: asml.silence@gmail.com, io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring/sqpoll: Increase task_work submission batch size
Date: Thu, 08 May 2025 14:14:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h61vrmu7.fsf@mailhost.krisman.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250508181203.3785544-1-krisman@suse.de> (Gabriel Krisman Bertazi's message of "Thu, 8 May 2025 14:12:03 -0400")
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de> writes:
> Our QA team reported a 10%-23%, throughput reduction on an io_uring
> sqpoll testcase doing IO to a null_blk, that I traced back to a
> reduction of the device submission queue depth utilization. It turns out
> that, after commit af5d68f8892f ("io_uring/sqpoll: manage task_work
> privately"), we capped the number of task_work entries that can be
> completed from a single spin of sqpoll to only 8 entries, before the
> sqpoll goes around to (potentially) sleep. While this cap doesn't drive
> the submission side directly, it impacts the completion behavior, which
> affects the number of IO queued by fio per sqpoll cycle on the
> submission side, and io_uring ends up seeing less ios per sqpoll cycle.
> As a result, block layer plugging is less effective, and we see more
> time spent inside the block layer in profilings charts, and increased
> submission latency measured by fio.
Uh, this should have been tagged as v2. The original submission and
some discussion available at:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/94da2142-d7c1-46bb-bc35-05d0d1c28182@kernel.dk/
--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-08 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-08 18:12 [PATCH] io_uring/sqpoll: Increase task_work submission batch size Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2025-05-08 18:14 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi [this message]
2025-05-09 13:57 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-04-03 19:56 Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2025-04-03 20:26 ` Jens Axboe
2025-04-04 1:18 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2025-04-07 15:47 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h61vrmu7.fsf@mailhost.krisman.be \
--to=krisman@suse.de \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.