All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de>
Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring/sqpoll: Increase task_work submission batch size
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 14:26:40 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <94da2142-d7c1-46bb-bc35-05d0d1c28182@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250403195605.1221203-1-krisman@suse.de>

On 4/3/25 1:56 PM, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> diff --git a/io_uring/sqpoll.c b/io_uring/sqpoll.c
> index d037cc68e9d3..e58e4d2b3bde 100644
> --- a/io_uring/sqpoll.c
> +++ b/io_uring/sqpoll.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
>  #include "sqpoll.h"
>  
>  #define IORING_SQPOLL_CAP_ENTRIES_VALUE 8
> -#define IORING_TW_CAP_ENTRIES_VALUE	8
> +#define IORING_TW_CAP_ENTRIES_VALUE	1024

That's a huge bump! This should not be a submission side thing, it's
purely running the task work. For this test case, I'm assuming you don't
see any io-wq activity, and hence everything is done purely inline from
the SQPOLL thread? This confuses me a bit, as this should not be driving
the queue depth at all, as submissions would be done by
__io_sq_thread(). And that part only caps when there is more than a
single ctx in there, which your case would not have. IOW, it should
submit everything that's there and hence this change should not change
the submission/queueing side of things. It only really deals with
running the task_work that will post the completion.

Maybe we should just not submit more until we've depleted the tw list?

In any case, we can _probably_ make this 32 or something without
worrying too much about it, though I would like to fully understand why
it's slower. Maybe it's the getrusage() that we do for every loop? You
could try and disable that just to see if it makes a difference?

-- 
Jens Axboe

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-03 20:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-03 19:56 [PATCH] io_uring/sqpoll: Increase task_work submission batch size Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2025-04-03 20:26 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2025-04-04  1:18   ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2025-04-07 15:47     ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-05-08 18:12 Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2025-05-08 18:14 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2025-05-09 13:57 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=94da2142-d7c1-46bb-bc35-05d0d1c28182@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krisman@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.