All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,  linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	 Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	 Lucas Stach <dev@lynxeye.de>,
	 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>,
	 Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	 Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@gmail.com>,
	 Natalie Vock <natalie.vock@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: mtd: rawnand: tegra: Simplify maximum determination in tegra_nand_setup_timing()
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 12:03:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h64a9y04.fsf@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0193ac44-e858-4aff-a50f-dd95dbf3de5b@web.de> (Markus Elfring's message of "Mon, 3 Mar 2025 11:55:49 +0100")

On 03/03/2025 at 11:55:49 +01, Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> wrote:

>> I am sorry, I do not see what gets simplified. max(max(a,b),max(c,d))
>> looks simpler than max3(a,b,max(c,d)).
>
> You would eventually like to express that a maximum should be determined
> from three (or even four?) values.

If there was a max4(), why not, but in this case I don't see the point.

> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.14-rc4/source/include/linux/minmax.h#L147
>
>
>>                                        Does it bring something in terms
>> of optimization?
> Corresponding effects depend on various factors, don't they?

Ok, so I'll assume the answer to my question is "no".

Thanks,
Miquèl

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,  linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	 Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	 Lucas Stach <dev@lynxeye.de>,
	 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	 Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>,
	 Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	 Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@gmail.com>,
	 Natalie Vock <natalie.vock@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: mtd: rawnand: tegra: Simplify maximum determination in tegra_nand_setup_timing()
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 12:03:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h64a9y04.fsf@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0193ac44-e858-4aff-a50f-dd95dbf3de5b@web.de> (Markus Elfring's message of "Mon, 3 Mar 2025 11:55:49 +0100")

On 03/03/2025 at 11:55:49 +01, Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de> wrote:

>> I am sorry, I do not see what gets simplified. max(max(a,b),max(c,d))
>> looks simpler than max3(a,b,max(c,d)).
>
> You would eventually like to express that a maximum should be determined
> from three (or even four?) values.

If there was a max4(), why not, but in this case I don't see the point.

> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.14-rc4/source/include/linux/minmax.h#L147
>
>
>>                                        Does it bring something in terms
>> of optimization?
> Corresponding effects depend on various factors, don't they?

Ok, so I'll assume the answer to my question is "no".

Thanks,
Miquèl

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-03 11:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-28 18:33 [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: tegra: Simplify maximum determination in tegra_nand_setup_timing() Markus Elfring
2025-02-28 18:33 ` Markus Elfring
2025-03-03 10:43 ` Miquel Raynal
2025-03-03 10:43   ` Miquel Raynal
2025-03-03 10:55   ` Markus Elfring
2025-03-03 10:55     ` Markus Elfring
2025-03-03 11:03     ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2025-03-03 11:03       ` Miquel Raynal
2025-03-03 11:15       ` Markus Elfring
2025-03-03 11:15         ` Markus Elfring
2025-03-03 11:25         ` Miquel Raynal
2025-03-03 11:25           ` Miquel Raynal
2025-03-04 15:09         ` Miquel Raynal
2025-03-04 15:09           ` Miquel Raynal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87h64a9y04.fsf@bootlin.com \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
    --cc=dev@lynxeye.de \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=natalie.vock@gmx.de \
    --cc=qasdev00@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=stefan@agner.ch \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.