All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [net] 9317bb6982: INFO: task cat-kmsg:893 blocked for more than 300 seconds.
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 10:16:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h9e5nxum.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iL32N6R2OQ3F3P33hMGxfuBxaFjVS0bYcPJXYw54zV3CA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3269 bytes --]

Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> writes:
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Huang, Ying <ying.huang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> Hi, Eric,
>>
>> kernel test robot <ying.huang@linux.intel.com> writes:
>>> FYI, we noticed the following commit:
>>>
>>> git://internal_merge_and_test_tree devel-catchup-201604281529
>>> commit 9317bb69824ec8d078b0b786b6971aedb0af3d4f ("net: SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE optimizations")
>>>
>>> on test machine: vm-kbuild-2G: 2 threads qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu Haswell,+smep,+smap with 2G memory
>>>
>>> caused below changes:
>>>
>>>
>>> +--------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
>>> |                                                  | 210732d16d | 9317bb6982 |
>>> +--------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
>>> | boot_successes                                   | 40         | 13         |
>>> | boot_failures                                    | 0          | 27         |
>>> | INFO:task_blocked_for_more_than#seconds          | 0          | 27         |
>>> | RIP:native_safe_halt                             | 0          | 20         |
>>> | RIP:native_write_msr_safe                        | 0          | 27         |
>>> | Kernel_panic-not_syncing:hung_task:blocked_tasks | 0          | 27         |
>>> | backtrace:__close_fd                             | 0          | 27         |
>>> | backtrace:SyS_close                              | 0          | 27         |
>>> | backtrace:cpu_startup_entry                      | 0          | 19         |
>>> | backtrace:watchdog                               | 0          | 27         |
>>> | RIP:__lock_acquire                               | 0          | 2          |
>>> | backtrace:rpc_async_schedule                     | 0          | 2          |
>>> | backtrace:lock_acquire                           | 0          | 1          |
>>> | RIP:delay_tsc                                    | 0          | 1          |
>>> | backtrace:SYSC_epoll_wait                        | 0          | 1          |
>>> | backtrace:SyS_epoll_wait                         | 0          | 1          |
>>> | RIP:pvclock_clocksource_read                     | 0          | 1          |
>>> | RIP:xs_reclassify_socket                         | 0          | 1          |
>>> | backtrace:xs_tcp_setup_socket                    | 0          | 2          |
>>> | RIP:insert_work                                  | 0          | 1          |
>>> +--------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
>>
>> We recently found this patch cause NFS hang in 0day/LKP test system.
>> The NFS export can be mounted, but after a while all read/write to NFS
>> mount blocked.  This influenced the 0day/LKP testing.  Could you help us
>> to fix this?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Huang, Ying
>
>
> I need to officially submit this patch :
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg375777.html

Thanks a lot!  The patch fixed our NFS hang.

Tested-by: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>

Is it possible to put the fixing patch near (preferably next) the patch
trigger regression?  Otherwise a bigger range of patches will not be
bisectable.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<lkp@01.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [net] 9317bb6982: INFO: task cat-kmsg:893 blocked for more than 300 seconds.
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 10:16:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h9e5nxum.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89iL32N6R2OQ3F3P33hMGxfuBxaFjVS0bYcPJXYw54zV3CA@mail.gmail.com> (Eric Dumazet's message of "Mon, 9 May 2016 18:42:36 -0700")

Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> writes:
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Huang, Ying <ying.huang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> Hi, Eric,
>>
>> kernel test robot <ying.huang@linux.intel.com> writes:
>>> FYI, we noticed the following commit:
>>>
>>> git://internal_merge_and_test_tree devel-catchup-201604281529
>>> commit 9317bb69824ec8d078b0b786b6971aedb0af3d4f ("net: SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE optimizations")
>>>
>>> on test machine: vm-kbuild-2G: 2 threads qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu Haswell,+smep,+smap with 2G memory
>>>
>>> caused below changes:
>>>
>>>
>>> +--------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
>>> |                                                  | 210732d16d | 9317bb6982 |
>>> +--------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
>>> | boot_successes                                   | 40         | 13         |
>>> | boot_failures                                    | 0          | 27         |
>>> | INFO:task_blocked_for_more_than#seconds          | 0          | 27         |
>>> | RIP:native_safe_halt                             | 0          | 20         |
>>> | RIP:native_write_msr_safe                        | 0          | 27         |
>>> | Kernel_panic-not_syncing:hung_task:blocked_tasks | 0          | 27         |
>>> | backtrace:__close_fd                             | 0          | 27         |
>>> | backtrace:SyS_close                              | 0          | 27         |
>>> | backtrace:cpu_startup_entry                      | 0          | 19         |
>>> | backtrace:watchdog                               | 0          | 27         |
>>> | RIP:__lock_acquire                               | 0          | 2          |
>>> | backtrace:rpc_async_schedule                     | 0          | 2          |
>>> | backtrace:lock_acquire                           | 0          | 1          |
>>> | RIP:delay_tsc                                    | 0          | 1          |
>>> | backtrace:SYSC_epoll_wait                        | 0          | 1          |
>>> | backtrace:SyS_epoll_wait                         | 0          | 1          |
>>> | RIP:pvclock_clocksource_read                     | 0          | 1          |
>>> | RIP:xs_reclassify_socket                         | 0          | 1          |
>>> | backtrace:xs_tcp_setup_socket                    | 0          | 2          |
>>> | RIP:insert_work                                  | 0          | 1          |
>>> +--------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
>>
>> We recently found this patch cause NFS hang in 0day/LKP test system.
>> The NFS export can be mounted, but after a while all read/write to NFS
>> mount blocked.  This influenced the 0day/LKP testing.  Could you help us
>> to fix this?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Huang, Ying
>
>
> I need to officially submit this patch :
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg375777.html

Thanks a lot!  The patch fixed our NFS hang.

Tested-by: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>

Is it possible to put the fixing patch near (preferably next) the patch
trigger regression?  Otherwise a bigger range of patches will not be
bisectable.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-11  2:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-03  1:15 [net] 9317bb6982: INFO: task cat-kmsg:893 blocked for more than 300 seconds kernel test robot
2016-05-10  1:26 ` Huang, Ying
2016-05-10  1:42   ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-10  1:42     ` [lkp] " Eric Dumazet
2016-05-11  2:16     ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2016-05-11  2:16       ` [LKP] " Huang, Ying
2016-05-13  3:01       ` Huang, Ying
2016-05-13  3:01         ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-05-13  3:38         ` Eric Dumazet
2016-05-13  3:38           ` [LKP] [lkp] " Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87h9e5nxum.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com \
    --to=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.