All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
To: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@newoldbits.com>
Cc: Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@gmail.com>,
	tony@atomide.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
	yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: SmartReflex: fix return value check in sr_dev_init()
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 14:37:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87haqc8sj1.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAORVsuUcOFKFoOuxZqPJR=WSsTouqBH3EP4Xu82o515ofGbn+w@mail.gmail.com> (Jean Pihet's message of "Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:41:35 +0200")

Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@newoldbits.com> writes:

> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
>>
>> In case of error, the function voltdm_lookup() returns NULL
>> not ERR_PTR(). The IS_ERR() test in the return value check
>> should be replaced with NULL test.
>>
>> dpatch engine is used to auto generate this patch.
>> (https://github.com/weiyj/dpatch)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/sr_device.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sr_device.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sr_device.c
>> index d033a65..c248b30 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sr_device.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sr_device.c
>> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static int __init sr_dev_init(struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *user)
>>         sr_data->senp_mod = 0x1;
>>
>>         sr_data->voltdm = voltdm_lookup(sr_dev_attr->sensor_voltdm_name);
>> -       if (IS_ERR(sr_data->voltdm)) {
>> +       if (!sr_data->voltdm) {
>>                 pr_err("%s: Unable to get voltage domain pointer for VDD %s\n",
>>                         __func__, sr_dev_attr->sensor_voltdm_name);
>>                 goto exit;
>
> This looks good, so here is the ack:
> Acked-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
>

Thanks, queuing this one for v3.7-rc.

Kevin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@deeprootsystems.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: SmartReflex: fix return value check in sr_dev_init()
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 14:37:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87haqc8sj1.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAORVsuUcOFKFoOuxZqPJR=WSsTouqBH3EP4Xu82o515ofGbn+w@mail.gmail.com> (Jean Pihet's message of "Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:41:35 +0200")

Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@newoldbits.com> writes:

> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Wei Yongjun <weiyj.lk@gmail.com> wrote:
>> From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
>>
>> In case of error, the function voltdm_lookup() returns NULL
>> not ERR_PTR(). The IS_ERR() test in the return value check
>> should be replaced with NULL test.
>>
>> dpatch engine is used to auto generate this patch.
>> (https://github.com/weiyj/dpatch)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/sr_device.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sr_device.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sr_device.c
>> index d033a65..c248b30 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sr_device.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sr_device.c
>> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static int __init sr_dev_init(struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *user)
>>         sr_data->senp_mod = 0x1;
>>
>>         sr_data->voltdm = voltdm_lookup(sr_dev_attr->sensor_voltdm_name);
>> -       if (IS_ERR(sr_data->voltdm)) {
>> +       if (!sr_data->voltdm) {
>>                 pr_err("%s: Unable to get voltage domain pointer for VDD %s\n",
>>                         __func__, sr_dev_attr->sensor_voltdm_name);
>>                 goto exit;
>
> This looks good, so here is the ack:
> Acked-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
>

Thanks, queuing this one for v3.7-rc.

Kevin

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-02 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-27  5:54 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: SmartReflex: fix return value check in sr_dev_init() Wei Yongjun
2012-09-27  5:54 ` Wei Yongjun
2012-09-28 10:41 ` Jean Pihet
2012-09-28 10:41   ` Jean Pihet
2012-10-02 21:37   ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-10-02 21:37     ` Kevin Hilman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87haqc8sj1.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
    --to=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
    --cc=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=weiyj.lk@gmail.com \
    --cc=yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.