* Compiler support for BPF at LSFMMBPF 2025 - Is there interest?
@ 2025-01-08 16:40 Jose E. Marchesi
2025-01-08 17:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-01-08 20:28 ` Yonghong Song
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jose E. Marchesi @ 2025-01-08 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf; +Cc: Yonghong Song, elena.zannoni
Hello people.
The deadline is approaching and we were wondering, should we prepare a
proposal for a discussion around BPF support in both GCC and clang for
LSFMMBPF? Like in previous years, we could do a recap of the on-going
work and where we stand, and discuss and clarify particular issues.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Compiler support for BPF at LSFMMBPF 2025 - Is there interest?
2025-01-08 16:40 Compiler support for BPF at LSFMMBPF 2025 - Is there interest? Jose E. Marchesi
@ 2025-01-08 17:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-01-08 17:23 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2025-01-08 20:28 ` Yonghong Song
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexei Starovoitov @ 2025-01-08 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jose E. Marchesi; +Cc: bpf, Yonghong Song, Elena Zannoni
On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 8:44 AM Jose E. Marchesi
<jose.marchesi@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hello people.
>
> The deadline is approaching and we were wondering, should we prepare a
> proposal for a discussion around BPF support in both GCC and clang for
> LSFMMBPF? Like in previous years, we could do a recap of the on-going
> work and where we stand, and discuss and clarify particular issues.
Yeah. Don't delay. See:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Z1wQcKKw14iei0Va@tiehlicka/
request attendance in gform and send email with [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] subject.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Compiler support for BPF at LSFMMBPF 2025 - Is there interest?
2025-01-08 17:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov
@ 2025-01-08 17:23 ` Jose E. Marchesi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jose E. Marchesi @ 2025-01-08 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexei Starovoitov; +Cc: bpf, Yonghong Song, Elena Zannoni
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 8:44 AM Jose E. Marchesi
> <jose.marchesi@oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hello people.
>>
>> The deadline is approaching and we were wondering, should we prepare a
>> proposal for a discussion around BPF support in both GCC and clang for
>> LSFMMBPF? Like in previous years, we could do a recap of the on-going
>> work and where we stand, and discuss and clarify particular issues.
>
> Yeah. Don't delay. See:
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Z1wQcKKw14iei0Va@tiehlicka/
> request attendance in gform and send email with [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] subject.
Will do today.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Compiler support for BPF at LSFMMBPF 2025 - Is there interest?
2025-01-08 16:40 Compiler support for BPF at LSFMMBPF 2025 - Is there interest? Jose E. Marchesi
2025-01-08 17:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov
@ 2025-01-08 20:28 ` Yonghong Song
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yonghong Song @ 2025-01-08 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jose E. Marchesi, bpf; +Cc: elena.zannoni
On 1/8/25 8:40 AM, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
> Hello people.
>
> The deadline is approaching and we were wondering, should we prepare a
> proposal for a discussion around BPF support in both GCC and clang for
> LSFMMBPF? Like in previous years, we could do a recap of the on-going
> work and where we stand, and discuss and clarify particular issues.
Thanks. Indeed this is a good topic to discuss w.r.t. clang/gcc related
issues.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-01-08 20:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-01-08 16:40 Compiler support for BPF at LSFMMBPF 2025 - Is there interest? Jose E. Marchesi
2025-01-08 17:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-01-08 17:23 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2025-01-08 20:28 ` Yonghong Song
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.