All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: vinod.govindapillai@intel.com, uma.shankar@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Implement Dbuf overlap detection feature starting from LNL
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 14:43:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87iktcpfcw.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241028120829.78735-1-vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>

On Mon, 28 Oct 2024, Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com> wrote:
> From: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
>
> From LNL onwards there is a new hardware feature, which
> allows to detect if the driver wrongly allocated DBuf
> entries and they happen to overlap. If enabled this will
> cause a specific interrupt to occur.
> We now handle it in the driver, by writing correspondent
> error message to kernel log.
>
> v2: Initialize dbuf overlap flag in runtime_defaults (Jani Nikula)
>
> v3: Unmask the overlap detection interrupt (Uma)
>
> Bspec: 69450
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c |  5 +++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h |  2 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c    | 10 ++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h                     |  2 ++
>  4 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c
> index aa22189e3853..0ac9a35e5f7b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c
> @@ -1227,6 +1227,7 @@ static const struct intel_display_device_info xe2_lpd_display = {
>  	.__runtime_defaults.fbc_mask =
>  		BIT(INTEL_FBC_A) | BIT(INTEL_FBC_B) |
>  		BIT(INTEL_FBC_C) | BIT(INTEL_FBC_D),
> +	.__runtime_defaults.has_dbuf_overlap_detection = true,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct intel_display_device_info xe2_hpd_display = {
> @@ -1668,6 +1669,10 @@ static void __intel_display_device_info_runtime_init(struct drm_i915_private *i9
>  		if (IS_DISPLAY_VER(i915, 10, 12) &&
>  		    (dfsm & GLK_DFSM_DISPLAY_DSC_DISABLE))
>  			display_runtime->has_dsc = 0;
> +
> +		if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 20 &&

Always use display over i915 when possible:

DISPLAY_VER(display)

> +		    (dfsm & XE2LPD_DFSM_DBUF_OVERLAP_DISABLE))
> +			display_runtime->has_dbuf_overlap_detection = false;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 20) {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
> index 071a36b51f79..6bf5672d874d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.h
> @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ enum intel_display_subplatform {
>  #define HAS_CDCLK_SQUASH(i915)		(DISPLAY_INFO(i915)->has_cdclk_squash)
>  #define HAS_CUR_FBC(i915)		(!HAS_GMCH(i915) && IS_DISPLAY_VER(i915, 7, 13))
>  #define HAS_D12_PLANE_MINIMIZATION(i915) (IS_ROCKETLAKE(i915) || IS_ALDERLAKE_S(i915))
> +#define HAS_DBUF_OVERLAP_DETECTION(__i915) (DISPLAY_RUNTIME_INFO(__i915)->has_dbuf_overlap_detection)
>  #define HAS_DDI(i915)			(DISPLAY_INFO(i915)->has_ddi)
>  #define HAS_DISPLAY(i915)		(DISPLAY_RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->pipe_mask != 0)
>  #define HAS_DMC(i915)			(DISPLAY_RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->has_dmc)
> @@ -232,6 +233,7 @@ struct intel_display_runtime_info {
>  	bool has_hdcp;
>  	bool has_dmc;
>  	bool has_dsc;
> +	bool has_dbuf_overlap_detection;
>  };
>  
>  struct intel_display_device_info {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c
> index a4f42ed3f21a..3d3c0c1fd184 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_irq.c
> @@ -902,6 +902,13 @@ gen8_de_misc_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 iir)
>  	struct intel_display *display = &dev_priv->display;
>  	bool found = false;
>  
> +	if (HAS_DBUF_OVERLAP_DETECTION(dev_priv)) {

HAS_DBUF_OVERLAP_DETECTION(display)

> +		if (iir & XE2LPD_DBUF_OVERLAP_DETECTED) {
> +			drm_warn(&dev_priv->drm,  "DBuf overlap detected\n");

drm_warn(display->drm, ...)

So the end result is that we get a warning, and that's it?

> +			found = true;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 14) {
>  		if (iir & (XELPDP_PMDEMAND_RSP |
>  			   XELPDP_PMDEMAND_RSPTOUT_ERR)) {
> @@ -1789,6 +1796,9 @@ void gen8_de_irq_postinstall(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  			de_port_masked |= DSI0_TE | DSI1_TE;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (HAS_DBUF_OVERLAP_DETECTION(dev_priv))

HAS_DBUF_OVERLAP_DETECTION(display)

> +		de_misc_masked |= XE2LPD_DBUF_OVERLAP_DETECTED;
> +
>  	if (HAS_DSB(dev_priv))
>  		de_pipe_masked |= GEN12_DSB_INT(INTEL_DSB_0) |
>  			GEN12_DSB_INT(INTEL_DSB_1) |
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 405f409e9761..327d1aa3f211 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -2589,6 +2589,7 @@
>  #define  GEN8_DE_MISC_GSE		REG_BIT(27)
>  #define  GEN8_DE_EDP_PSR		REG_BIT(19)
>  #define  XELPDP_PMDEMAND_RSP		REG_BIT(3)
> +#define  XE2LPD_DBUF_OVERLAP_DETECTED	REG_BIT(1)
>  
>  #define GEN8_DE_MISC_IRQ_REGS		I915_IRQ_REGS(GEN8_DE_MISC_IMR, \
>  						      GEN8_DE_MISC_IER, \
> @@ -2894,6 +2895,7 @@
>  #define   SKL_DFSM_PIPE_C_DISABLE	(1 << 28)
>  #define   TGL_DFSM_PIPE_D_DISABLE	(1 << 22)
>  #define   GLK_DFSM_DISPLAY_DSC_DISABLE	(1 << 7)
> +#define   XE2LPD_DFSM_DBUF_OVERLAP_DISABLE	(1 << 3)
>  
>  #define XE2LPD_DE_CAP			_MMIO(0x41100)
>  #define   XE2LPD_DE_CAP_3DLUT_MASK	REG_GENMASK(31, 30)

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-28 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-28 12:08 [PATCH] drm/i915: Implement Dbuf overlap detection feature starting from LNL Vinod Govindapillai
2024-10-28 12:43 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2024-10-28 14:09   ` Govindapillai, Vinod
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-10-29  9:12 Vinod Govindapillai
2024-10-29 10:13 ` Jani Nikula
2024-10-29 10:24   ` Govindapillai, Vinod
2024-08-05 12:00 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2024-08-05 13:01 ` Jani Nikula
2024-08-05 13:09 ` Govindapillai, Vinod

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87iktcpfcw.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=vinod.govindapillai@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.