From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: devel@linuxdriverproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] netvsc: get rid of completion timeouts
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 18:05:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87inxjacnu.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465395546-28272-1-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com> (Vitaly Kuznetsov's message of "Wed, 8 Jun 2016 16:19:06 +0200")
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> writes:
> I'm hitting 5 second timeout in rndis_filter_set_rss_param() while setting
> RSS parameters for the device. When this happens we end up returning
> -ETIMEDOUT from the function and rndis_filter_device_add() falls back to
> setting
>
> net_device->max_chn = 1;
> net_device->num_chn = 1;
> net_device->num_sc_offered = 0;
>
> but after a moment the rndis request succeeds and subchannels start to
> appear. netvsc_sc_open() does unconditional nvscdev->num_sc_offered-- and
> it becomes U32_MAX-1. Consequent rndis_filter_device_remove() will hang
> while waiting for all U32_MAX-1 subchannels to appear and this is not
> going to happen.
>
> The immediate issue could be solved by adding num_sc_offered > 0 check to
> netvsc_sc_open() but we're getting out of sync with the host and it's not
> easy to adjust things later, e.g. in this particular case we'll be creating
> queues without a user request for it and races are expected. Same applies
> to other parts of the driver which have the same completion timeout.
>
> Following the trend in drivers/hv/* code I suggest we remove all these
> timeouts completely. As a guest we can always trust the host we're running
> on and if the host screws things up there is no easy way to recover anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Kbuild test robot reports an unused variable after the patch, I'll fix
this and resend together with a related fix so please don't apply this
RFC to net-next atm.
[skip]
--
Vitaly
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: devel@linuxdriverproject.org,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] netvsc: get rid of completion timeouts
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 18:05:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87inxjacnu.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465395546-28272-1-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com> (Vitaly Kuznetsov's message of "Wed, 8 Jun 2016 16:19:06 +0200")
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> writes:
> I'm hitting 5 second timeout in rndis_filter_set_rss_param() while setting
> RSS parameters for the device. When this happens we end up returning
> -ETIMEDOUT from the function and rndis_filter_device_add() falls back to
> setting
>
> net_device->max_chn = 1;
> net_device->num_chn = 1;
> net_device->num_sc_offered = 0;
>
> but after a moment the rndis request succeeds and subchannels start to
> appear. netvsc_sc_open() does unconditional nvscdev->num_sc_offered-- and
> it becomes U32_MAX-1. Consequent rndis_filter_device_remove() will hang
> while waiting for all U32_MAX-1 subchannels to appear and this is not
> going to happen.
>
> The immediate issue could be solved by adding num_sc_offered > 0 check to
> netvsc_sc_open() but we're getting out of sync with the host and it's not
> easy to adjust things later, e.g. in this particular case we'll be creating
> queues without a user request for it and races are expected. Same applies
> to other parts of the driver which have the same completion timeout.
>
> Following the trend in drivers/hv/* code I suggest we remove all these
> timeouts completely. As a guest we can always trust the host we're running
> on and if the host screws things up there is no easy way to recover anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Kbuild test robot reports an unused variable after the patch, I'll fix
this and resend together with a related fix so please don't apply this
RFC to net-next atm.
[skip]
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-08 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-08 14:19 [PATCH RFC net-next] netvsc: get rid of completion timeouts Vitaly Kuznetsov
2016-06-08 14:31 ` Haiyang Zhang
2016-06-08 14:31 ` Haiyang Zhang
2016-06-08 16:05 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2016-06-08 16:05 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87inxjacnu.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.