* conformance, compliance and compatibility
@ 2004-01-30 22:49 Esben Stien
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Esben Stien @ 2004-01-30 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
I remember to have read that ISO has standardized on using
conformance for everything that is conforming to a specific
standard but I can't find it again. Anyone know where I could
look?
AFAIK, this is my understanding of these words
Conformance has a deep root different meaning than compliance,
but today that difference is not clear. However, ISO has
standardized on using the word conformance and not compliance
when saying something conforms to a standard.
Compatibility is for hardware. You can say that a specific
piece of hardware is compatible with another piece of hardware
cause it speaks the same protocol. Compatibility is a way of
saying that two components uses the same interfaces.
You can not call a system unix today, cause unix today is a
standard. The last unix was sysv. You can however say a system
is conforming to unix (iso posix unix)(ieee 1003.1), so it is a
unix conformant system. (to be technically correct).
Is there any document that clarifies these words better. I'm
looking for some official documentation from a standards body
like ISO, IEC etc.
I also see the words comformance and compliance used
interchangably in RFC's, but to my knowledge I think I remember
that RFC's where also supposed to be using conformance
--
b0ef
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-01-30 23:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-30 22:49 conformance, compliance and compatibility Esben Stien
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.