All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@bytedance.com>
To: Usama Arif <usama.arif@bytedance.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	fam.zheng@bytedance.com, bagasdotme@gmail.com, maz@kernel.org,
	punit.agrawal@bytedance.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
	liangma@liangbit.com, steven.price@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [v2 1/6] KVM: arm64: Document PV-lock interface
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 17:56:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k0463axq.fsf@stealth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20221104062105.4119003-2-usama.arif@bytedance.com

Hi Usama,

Usama Arif <usama.arif@bytedance.com> writes:

> Introduce a paravirtualization interface for KVM/arm64 to obtain whether
> the VCPU is currently running or not.
>
> The PV lock structure of the guest is allocated by user space.
>
> A hypercall interface is provided for the guest to interrogate the
> location of the shared memory structures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zengruan Ye <yezengruan@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@bytedance.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/index.rst    |  1 +
>  Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pvlock.rst   | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  Documentation/virt/kvm/devices/vcpu.rst | 25 ++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 78 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pvlock.rst
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/index.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/index.rst
> index e84848432158..b8499dc00a6a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/index.rst
> @@ -10,4 +10,5 @@ ARM
>     hyp-abi
>     hypercalls
>     pvtime
> +   pvlock
>     ptp_kvm
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pvlock.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pvlock.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d3c391b16d36
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pvlock.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +Paravirtualized lock support for arm64
> +======================================
> +
> +KVM/arm64 provides a hypervisor service call for paravirtualized guests to
> +determine whether a VCPU is currently running or not.
> +
> +A new SMCCC compatible hypercall is defined:
> +
> +* ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_PV_LOCK_FUNC_ID:   0xC6000002
> +
> +ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_PV_LOCK_FUNC_ID
> +
> +    ============= ========    ==========================================
> +    Function ID:  (uint32)    0xC6000002
> +    Return value: (int64)     IPA of the pv lock data structure for this
> +                              VCPU. On failure:
> +                              NOT_SUPPORTED (-1)
> +    ============= ========    ==========================================
> +
> +The IPA returned by PV_LOCK_PREEMPTED should be mapped by the guest as normal
> +memory with inner and outer write back caching attributes, in the inner
> +shareable domain.
> +
> +PV_LOCK_PREEMPTED returns the structure for the calling VCPU.
> +
> +PV lock state
> +-------------
> +
> +The structure pointed to by the PV_LOCK_PREEMPTED hypercall is as follows:
> +
> ++-----------+-------------+-------------+---------------------------------+
> +| Field     | Byte Length | Byte Offset | Description                     |
> ++===========+=============+=============+=================================+
> +| preempted |      8      |      0      | Indicate if the VCPU that owns  |
> +|           |             |             | this struct is running or not.  |
> +|           |             |             | Non-zero values mean the VCPU   |
> +|           |             |             | has been preempted. Zero means  |
> +|           |             |             | the VCPU is not preempted.      |
> ++-----------+-------------+-------------+---------------------------------+
> +
> +The preempted field will be updated to 1 by the hypervisor prior to scheduling
> +a VCPU. When the VCPU is scheduled out, the preempted field will be updated
> +to 0 by the hypervisor.

The text above doesn't match the description in the table. Please update
the texts to align them with the code.

[...]

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@bytedance.com>
To: Usama Arif <usama.arif@bytedance.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
	yezengruan@huawei.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	maz@kernel.org, steven.price@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	bagasdotme@gmail.com, fam.zheng@bytedance.com,
	liangma@liangbit.com, punit.agrawal@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [v2 1/6] KVM: arm64: Document PV-lock interface
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 17:56:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k0463axq.fsf@stealth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20221104062105.4119003-2-usama.arif@bytedance.com

Hi Usama,

Usama Arif <usama.arif@bytedance.com> writes:

> Introduce a paravirtualization interface for KVM/arm64 to obtain whether
> the VCPU is currently running or not.
>
> The PV lock structure of the guest is allocated by user space.
>
> A hypercall interface is provided for the guest to interrogate the
> location of the shared memory structures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zengruan Ye <yezengruan@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@bytedance.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/index.rst    |  1 +
>  Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pvlock.rst   | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  Documentation/virt/kvm/devices/vcpu.rst | 25 ++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 78 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pvlock.rst
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/index.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/index.rst
> index e84848432158..b8499dc00a6a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/index.rst
> @@ -10,4 +10,5 @@ ARM
>     hyp-abi
>     hypercalls
>     pvtime
> +   pvlock
>     ptp_kvm
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pvlock.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pvlock.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d3c391b16d36
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pvlock.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +Paravirtualized lock support for arm64
> +======================================
> +
> +KVM/arm64 provides a hypervisor service call for paravirtualized guests to
> +determine whether a VCPU is currently running or not.
> +
> +A new SMCCC compatible hypercall is defined:
> +
> +* ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_PV_LOCK_FUNC_ID:   0xC6000002
> +
> +ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_PV_LOCK_FUNC_ID
> +
> +    ============= ========    ==========================================
> +    Function ID:  (uint32)    0xC6000002
> +    Return value: (int64)     IPA of the pv lock data structure for this
> +                              VCPU. On failure:
> +                              NOT_SUPPORTED (-1)
> +    ============= ========    ==========================================
> +
> +The IPA returned by PV_LOCK_PREEMPTED should be mapped by the guest as normal
> +memory with inner and outer write back caching attributes, in the inner
> +shareable domain.
> +
> +PV_LOCK_PREEMPTED returns the structure for the calling VCPU.
> +
> +PV lock state
> +-------------
> +
> +The structure pointed to by the PV_LOCK_PREEMPTED hypercall is as follows:
> +
> ++-----------+-------------+-------------+---------------------------------+
> +| Field     | Byte Length | Byte Offset | Description                     |
> ++===========+=============+=============+=================================+
> +| preempted |      8      |      0      | Indicate if the VCPU that owns  |
> +|           |             |             | this struct is running or not.  |
> +|           |             |             | Non-zero values mean the VCPU   |
> +|           |             |             | has been preempted. Zero means  |
> +|           |             |             | the VCPU is not preempted.      |
> ++-----------+-------------+-------------+---------------------------------+
> +
> +The preempted field will be updated to 1 by the hypervisor prior to scheduling
> +a VCPU. When the VCPU is scheduled out, the preempted field will be updated
> +to 0 by the hypervisor.

The text above doesn't match the description in the table. Please update
the texts to align them with the code.

[...]


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@bytedance.com>
To: Usama Arif <usama.arif@bytedance.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,  kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	 virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk,  yezengruan@huawei.com,
	 catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,  maz@kernel.org,
	 steven.price@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	 bagasdotme@gmail.com,  fam.zheng@bytedance.com,
	liangma@liangbit.com,  punit.agrawal@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [v2 1/6] KVM: arm64: Document PV-lock interface
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2022 17:56:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k0463axq.fsf@stealth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20221104062105.4119003-2-usama.arif@bytedance.com

Hi Usama,

Usama Arif <usama.arif@bytedance.com> writes:

> Introduce a paravirtualization interface for KVM/arm64 to obtain whether
> the VCPU is currently running or not.
>
> The PV lock structure of the guest is allocated by user space.
>
> A hypercall interface is provided for the guest to interrogate the
> location of the shared memory structures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zengruan Ye <yezengruan@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@bytedance.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/index.rst    |  1 +
>  Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pvlock.rst   | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  Documentation/virt/kvm/devices/vcpu.rst | 25 ++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 78 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pvlock.rst
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/index.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/index.rst
> index e84848432158..b8499dc00a6a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/index.rst
> @@ -10,4 +10,5 @@ ARM
>     hyp-abi
>     hypercalls
>     pvtime
> +   pvlock
>     ptp_kvm
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pvlock.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pvlock.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d3c391b16d36
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/arm/pvlock.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +Paravirtualized lock support for arm64
> +======================================
> +
> +KVM/arm64 provides a hypervisor service call for paravirtualized guests to
> +determine whether a VCPU is currently running or not.
> +
> +A new SMCCC compatible hypercall is defined:
> +
> +* ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_PV_LOCK_FUNC_ID:   0xC6000002
> +
> +ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_PV_LOCK_FUNC_ID
> +
> +    ============= ========    ==========================================
> +    Function ID:  (uint32)    0xC6000002
> +    Return value: (int64)     IPA of the pv lock data structure for this
> +                              VCPU. On failure:
> +                              NOT_SUPPORTED (-1)
> +    ============= ========    ==========================================
> +
> +The IPA returned by PV_LOCK_PREEMPTED should be mapped by the guest as normal
> +memory with inner and outer write back caching attributes, in the inner
> +shareable domain.
> +
> +PV_LOCK_PREEMPTED returns the structure for the calling VCPU.
> +
> +PV lock state
> +-------------
> +
> +The structure pointed to by the PV_LOCK_PREEMPTED hypercall is as follows:
> +
> ++-----------+-------------+-------------+---------------------------------+
> +| Field     | Byte Length | Byte Offset | Description                     |
> ++===========+=============+=============+=================================+
> +| preempted |      8      |      0      | Indicate if the VCPU that owns  |
> +|           |             |             | this struct is running or not.  |
> +|           |             |             | Non-zero values mean the VCPU   |
> +|           |             |             | has been preempted. Zero means  |
> +|           |             |             | the VCPU is not preempted.      |
> ++-----------+-------------+-------------+---------------------------------+
> +
> +The preempted field will be updated to 1 by the hypervisor prior to scheduling
> +a VCPU. When the VCPU is scheduled out, the preempted field will be updated
> +to 0 by the hypervisor.

The text above doesn't match the description in the table. Please update
the texts to align them with the code.

[...]


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-10 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-04  6:20 [v2 0/6] KVM: arm64: implement vcpu_is_preempted check Usama Arif
2022-11-04  6:20 ` Usama Arif
2022-11-04  6:20 ` Usama Arif
2022-11-04  6:21 ` [v2 1/6] KVM: arm64: Document PV-lock interface Usama Arif
2022-11-04  6:21   ` Usama Arif
2022-11-04  6:21   ` Usama Arif
2022-11-07 17:56   ` Punit Agrawal [this message]
2022-11-07 17:56     ` Punit Agrawal
2022-11-07 17:56     ` Punit Agrawal
2022-11-07 18:05     ` Usama Arif
2022-11-07 18:05       ` Usama Arif
2022-11-07 18:05       ` Usama Arif
2022-11-04  6:21 ` [v2 2/6] KVM: arm64: Add SMCCC paravirtualised lock calls Usama Arif
2022-11-04  6:21   ` Usama Arif
2022-11-04  6:21   ` Usama Arif
2022-11-07 17:58   ` Punit Agrawal
2022-11-07 17:58     ` Punit Agrawal
2022-11-07 17:58     ` Punit Agrawal
2022-11-07 18:08     ` Usama Arif
2022-11-07 18:08       ` Usama Arif
2022-11-07 18:08       ` Usama Arif
2022-11-04  6:21 ` [v2 3/6] KVM: arm64: Support pvlock preempted via shared structure Usama Arif
2022-11-04  6:21   ` Usama Arif
2022-11-04  6:21   ` Usama Arif
2022-11-07 18:02   ` Punit Agrawal
2022-11-07 18:02     ` Punit Agrawal
2022-11-07 18:02     ` Punit Agrawal
2022-11-07 18:09     ` Usama Arif
2022-11-07 18:09       ` Usama Arif
2022-11-07 18:09       ` Usama Arif
2022-11-04  6:21 ` [v2 4/6] KVM: arm64: Provide VCPU attributes for PV lock Usama Arif
2022-11-04  6:21   ` Usama Arif
2022-11-04  6:21   ` Usama Arif
2022-11-04  6:21 ` [v2 5/6] KVM: arm64: Support the VCPU preemption check Usama Arif
2022-11-04  6:21   ` Usama Arif
2022-11-04  6:21   ` Usama Arif
2022-11-04  6:21 ` [v2 6/6] KVM: selftests: add tests for PV time specific hypercall Usama Arif
2022-11-04  6:21   ` Usama Arif
2022-11-04  6:21   ` Usama Arif
2022-11-04  9:02 ` [v2 0/6] KVM: arm64: implement vcpu_is_preempted check Marc Zyngier
2022-11-04  9:02   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-04  9:02   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-06 16:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-06 16:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-06 16:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-07 12:00   ` [External] " Usama Arif
2022-11-07 12:00     ` Usama Arif
2022-11-07 12:00     ` Usama Arif
2022-11-18  0:20     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-18  0:20       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-18  0:20       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-11-24 13:55       ` Usama Arif
2022-11-24 13:55         ` Usama Arif
2022-11-24 13:55         ` Usama Arif
2022-12-05 13:43         ` Usama Arif
2022-12-05 13:43           ` Usama Arif
2022-12-05 13:43           ` Usama Arif
2023-01-17 10:50           ` Usama Arif
2023-01-17 10:50             ` Usama Arif
2022-11-07 18:24 ` Punit Agrawal
2022-11-07 18:24   ` Punit Agrawal
2022-11-07 18:24   ` Punit Agrawal
2022-11-09 19:38   ` Usama Arif
2022-11-09 19:38     ` Usama Arif
2022-11-09 19:38     ` Usama Arif

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87k0463axq.fsf@stealth \
    --to=punit.agrawal@bytedance.com \
    --cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=fam.zheng@bytedance.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=liangma@liangbit.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=usama.arif@bytedance.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.