* [PATCH RFC 11/13] evaluate: relax some constant expression rules for pointer expressions
@ 2015-07-22 23:23 Nicolai Stange
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Nicolai Stange @ 2015-07-22 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sparse
The official constraints on constant expressions [6.6] are insanely
strict in that they do not allow some constructs commonly used in the
wild.
Relax them by treating
- address constants cast to different pointer type as address constants
again,
- address constants cast to integer type as integer constant
expressions
- conditional expressions whose true and false branches both yield
address constants as address constants,
- and conditional expressions whose condition is an address constant
as an constant expression to the extent their true and false branches
allow.
Signed-off-by: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
---
evaluate.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/evaluate.c b/evaluate.c
index c115e64..ee5f18f 100644
--- a/evaluate.c
+++ b/evaluate.c
@@ -1125,14 +1125,25 @@ static struct symbol *evaluate_conditional_expression(struct expression *expr)
true = &expr->cond_true;
}
- expr->flags |= expr_flags_decay_consts(expr->conditional->flags &
- (*true)->flags &
- expr->cond_false->flags);
/*
+ * A conditional operator yields a particular constant
+ * expression type only if all of its three subexpressions are
+ * of that type [6.6(6), 6.6(8)].
+ * As an extension, relax this restriction by allowing any
+ * constant expression type for the condition expression.
+ *
* A conditional operator never yields an address constant
* [6.6(9)].
+ * However, as an extension, if the condition is any constant
+ * expression, and the true and false expressions are both
+ * address constants, mark the result as an address constant.
*/
- expr->flags &= ~expr_clear_flag_mask(EXPR_FLAG_ADDR_CONST_EXPR);
+ if ((expr->conditional->flags &
+ (expr_set_flag_mask(EXPR_FLAG_ARITH_CONST_EXPR) |
+ expr_set_flag_mask(EXPR_FLAG_ADDR_CONST_EXPR))))
+ expr->flags |=
+ expr_flags_decay_consts((*true)->flags &
+ expr->cond_false->flags);
lclass = classify_type(ltype, <ype);
rclass = classify_type(rtype, &rtype);
@@ -2780,15 +2791,31 @@ static struct symbol *evaluate_cast(struct expression *expr)
/*
* Casts of integer literals to pointer type yield
* address constants [6.6(9)].
+ *
+ * As an extension, treat address constants cast to a
+ * different pointer type as address constants again.
+ *
+ * As another extension, treat integer constant
+ * expressions (in contrast to literals) cast to
+ * pointer type as address constants.
*/
if (class1 & TYPE_PTR &&
- (target->flags & EXPR_FLAG_INT_CONST)) {
+ ((target->flags & EXPR_FLAG_INT_CONST_EXPR) ||
+ (target->flags & EXPR_FLAG_ADDR_CONST_EXPR))) {
expr->flags |=
expr_set_flag_mask(EXPR_FLAG_ADDR_CONST_EXPR);
}
} else {
expr->flags |= expr_flags_decay_consts(target->flags);
+
+ /*
+ * As an extension, treat address constants cast to
+ * integer type as an arithmetic constant.
+ */
+ if (expr->flags & EXPR_FLAG_ADDR_CONST_EXPR)
+ expr->flags |=
+ expr_set_flag_mask(EXPR_FLAG_ARITH_CONST_EXPR);
/*
* Casts to numeric types never result in address
* constants [6.6(9)].
--
2.4.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2015-07-22 23:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-07-22 23:23 [PATCH RFC 11/13] evaluate: relax some constant expression rules for pointer expressions Nicolai Stange
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.