All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: Support building HV and PR KVM as module
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:57:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k3hybh68.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9CCFAB0B-A05C-4C70-AA87-6339D1BA1471@suse.de>

Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> writes:

> On 27.09.2013, at 15:08, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>
>> Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> writes:
>> 
>>> On 27.09.2013, at 12:03, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c
>>>> index fd5b393..775d368 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c
>>>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>>>> #include <asm/machdep.h>
>>>> #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
>>>> #include <asm/hw_irq.h>
>>>> +
>>> 
>>> Stray whitespace change
>>> 
>> 
>> will fix
>> 
>>>> #include "trace_pr.h"
>>>> 
>>>> #define PTE_SIZE 12
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c
>>>> index b9841ad..20d03c2 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c
>>>> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ int kvmppc_core_emulate_op_pr(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>>> 			vcpu->arch.mmu.tlbie(vcpu, addr, large);
>>>> 			break;
>>>> 		}
>>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_PR
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_PR
>>> 
>>> Why?
>> 
>> If i have CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_PR=m  #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_PR will
>> not work. There is a runtime check I can use IS_ENABLED(). But didn't
>> want to do those. Hence moved to the symbol which will be set as
>> CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_PR = y
>
> Ah, I see. The naming starts to get really confusing. Could you please
> give this a slightly better name, such as
> CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_PR_POSSIBLE or such, so that it's obvious that this
> #ifdef doesn't mean "option is enabled", but instead means "option can
> potentially be enabled through a module".

Will do

-aneesh


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: Support building HV and PR KVM as module
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:27:51 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k3hybh68.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9CCFAB0B-A05C-4C70-AA87-6339D1BA1471@suse.de>

Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> writes:

> On 27.09.2013, at 15:08, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>
>> Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> writes:
>> 
>>> On 27.09.2013, at 12:03, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c
>>>> index fd5b393..775d368 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c
>>>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>>>> #include <asm/machdep.h>
>>>> #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
>>>> #include <asm/hw_irq.h>
>>>> +
>>> 
>>> Stray whitespace change
>>> 
>> 
>> will fix
>> 
>>>> #include "trace_pr.h"
>>>> 
>>>> #define PTE_SIZE 12
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c
>>>> index b9841ad..20d03c2 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c
>>>> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ int kvmppc_core_emulate_op_pr(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>>> 			vcpu->arch.mmu.tlbie(vcpu, addr, large);
>>>> 			break;
>>>> 		}
>>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_PR
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_PR
>>> 
>>> Why?
>> 
>> If i have CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_PR=m  #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_PR will
>> not work. There is a runtime check I can use IS_ENABLED(). But didn't
>> want to do those. Hence moved to the symbol which will be set as
>> CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_PR = y
>
> Ah, I see. The naming starts to get really confusing. Could you please
> give this a slightly better name, such as
> CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_PR_POSSIBLE or such, so that it's obvious that this
> #ifdef doesn't mean "option is enabled", but instead means "option can
> potentially be enabled through a module".

Will do

-aneesh

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-30 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 114+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-27 10:03 [RFC PATCH 00/11 Allow PR and HV KVM to coexist in one kernel Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:15 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s hv: Fix vcore leak Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:15   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 11:39   ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 11:39     ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: remove kvmppc_handler_highmem label Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:15   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: move book3s_64_vio_hv.c into the main kernel binary Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:15   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: Add a new config variable CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HV Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:15   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 11:43   ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 11:43     ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 12:45     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 12:57       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: Add kvmppc_ops callback for HV and PR specific operations Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:15   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 12:04   ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: Add kvmppc_ops callback for HV and PR specific operation Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 12:04     ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: Add kvmppc_ops callback for HV and PR specific operations Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 12:52     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 12:52       ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: Add kvmppc_ops callback for HV and PR specific operation Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: Add is_hv_enabled to kvmppc_ops Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:15   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 12:18   ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 12:18     ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 13:03     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 13:15       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 10:09       ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 10:09         ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 12:56         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 12:56           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 14:51           ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 14:51             ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 16:20             ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 16:32               ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 16:36               ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 16:36                 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: pr: move PR related tracepoints to a separate header Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:15   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 12:22   ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 12:22     ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 13:06     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 13:18       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 10:02       ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 10:02         ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 12:57         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 12:57           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 14:51           ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 14:51             ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 15:53             ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 15:53               ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 15:55               ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 15:55                 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: Support building HV and PR KVM as module Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:15   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 12:25   ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 12:25     ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 13:08     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 13:20       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 10:04       ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 10:04         ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 12:57         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2013-09-30 12:57           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] kvm: simplify processor compat check Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:15   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 12:31   ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 12:31     ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 12:31     ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 13:13     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 13:25       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 13:13       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 15:14       ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-27 15:14         ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-27 15:14         ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-28 15:36         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-28 15:48           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-28 15:36           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-29  8:58           ` Gleb Natapov
2013-09-29  8:58             ` Gleb Natapov
2013-09-29  8:58             ` Gleb Natapov
2013-09-29 15:05             ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-29 15:17               ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-29 15:05               ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-29 15:11               ` Gleb Natapov
2013-09-29 15:11                 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-09-29 15:11                 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: Allow the HV and PR selection per virtual machine Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:15   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: Fix module ownership Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:15   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:52 ` [RFC PATCH 00/11 Allow PR and HV KVM to coexist in one kernel Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:52   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 10:16   ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 10:16     ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 10:16     ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 13:09     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 13:21       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 13:09       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 14:54       ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 14:54         ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 14:54         ` Alexander Graf
2013-10-01 11:26         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-10-01 11:38           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-10-01 11:26           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-10-01 11:36           ` Alexander Graf
2013-10-01 11:36             ` Alexander Graf
2013-10-01 11:36             ` Alexander Graf
2013-10-01 11:41             ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-10-01 11:41               ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-10-01 11:41               ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-10-01 11:43             ` Alexander Graf
2013-10-01 11:43               ` Alexander Graf
2013-10-01 11:43               ` Alexander Graf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87k3hybh68.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.