From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Cc: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@newoldbits.com>,
tony@atomide.com, paul@pwsan.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Use pre-empt safe cpu_get/put insted of smp_processor_id
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:50:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k3w5jydz.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50499A5C.60006@ti.com> (Roger Quadros's message of "Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:55:24 +0300")
Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> writes:
> Hi Jean,
>
> My bad, I didn't follow up with this. My guess is that it has not been
> picked up. Tony, Kevin?
>
Wasn't picked up by me (but should've been, sorry.) Care to refresh
against v3.6-rc4 and resend?
Thanks,
Kevin
>
> On 09/06/2012 09:59 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
>> Fixed Paul's email address
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@newoldbits.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Roger,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> wrote:
>>>> gets rid of below messages with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT enabled
>>>>
>>>> [ 28.832916] debug_smp_processor_id: 18 callbacks suppressed
>>>> [ 28.832946] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: modprobe/1763
>>>> [ 28.841491] caller is pwrdm_set_next_pwrst+0x54/0x120
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
>>>
>>> What his the status of the patch? Has it been reviewed and taken in an
>>> integration tree? I cannot find anything about it in l-o and
>>> linux-next.
>>>
>>> I have some changes on-going in the OMAP PM code and I would like to
>>> know if $SUBJECT is applicable.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jean
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c | 9 ++++++---
>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 12 ++++++++----
>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c | 6 ++++--
>>>> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
>>>> index ea3f565..06747b6 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
>>>> @@ -285,7 +285,8 @@ void omap2_clk_disable(struct clk *clk)
>>>> pr_debug("clock: %s: disabling in hardware\n", clk->name);
>>>>
>>>> if (clk->ops && clk->ops->disable) {
>>>> - trace_clock_disable(clk->name, 0, smp_processor_id());
>>>> + trace_clock_disable(clk->name, 0, get_cpu());
>>>> + put_cpu();
>>>> clk->ops->disable(clk);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -339,7 +340,8 @@ int omap2_clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> if (clk->ops && clk->ops->enable) {
>>>> - trace_clock_enable(clk->name, 1, smp_processor_id());
>>>> + trace_clock_enable(clk->name, 1, get_cpu());
>>>> + put_cpu();
>>>> ret = clk->ops->enable(clk);
>>>> if (ret) {
>>>> WARN(1, "clock: %s: could not enable: %d\n",
>>>> @@ -380,7 +382,8 @@ int omap2_clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
>>>>
>>>> /* dpll_ck, core_ck, virt_prcm_set; plus all clksel clocks */
>>>> if (clk->set_rate) {
>>>> - trace_clock_set_rate(clk->name, rate, smp_processor_id());
>>>> + trace_clock_set_rate(clk->name, rate, get_cpu());
>>>> + put_cpu();
>>>> ret = clk->set_rate(clk, rate);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
>>>> index e4fc88c..81fec2e 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
>>>> @@ -357,18 +357,22 @@ void omap_sram_idle(void)
>>>>
>>>> static void omap3_pm_idle(void)
>>>> {
>>>> + unsigned cpu;
>>>> +
>>>> local_fiq_disable();
>>>>
>>>> if (omap_irq_pending())
>>>> goto out;
>>>>
>>>> - trace_power_start(POWER_CSTATE, 1, smp_processor_id());
>>>> - trace_cpu_idle(1, smp_processor_id());
>>>> + cpu = get_cpu();
>>>> + trace_power_start(POWER_CSTATE, 1, cpu);
>>>> + trace_cpu_idle(1, cpu);
>>>>
>>>> omap_sram_idle();
>>>>
>>>> - trace_power_end(smp_processor_id());
>>>> - trace_cpu_idle(PWR_EVENT_EXIT, smp_processor_id());
>>>> + trace_power_end(cpu);
>>>> + trace_cpu_idle(PWR_EVENT_EXIT, cpu);
>>>> + put_cpu();
>>>>
>>>> out:
>>>> local_fiq_enable();
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c
>>>> index 69b36e1..138bf86 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c
>>>> @@ -169,7 +169,8 @@ static int _pwrdm_state_switch(struct powerdomain *pwrdm, int flag)
>>>> ((state & OMAP_POWERSTATE_MASK) << 8) |
>>>> ((prev & OMAP_POWERSTATE_MASK) << 0));
>>>> trace_power_domain_target(pwrdm->name, trace_state,
>>>> - smp_processor_id());
>>>> + get_cpu());
>>>> + put_cpu();
>>>> }
>>>> break;
>>>> default:
>>>> @@ -491,7 +492,8 @@ int pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(struct powerdomain *pwrdm, u8 pwrst)
>>>> if (arch_pwrdm && arch_pwrdm->pwrdm_set_next_pwrst) {
>>>> /* Trace the pwrdm desired target state */
>>>> trace_power_domain_target(pwrdm->name, pwrst,
>>>> - smp_processor_id());
>>>> + get_cpu());
>>>> + put_cpu();
>>>> /* Program the pwrdm desired target state */
>>>> ret = arch_pwrdm->pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(pwrdm, pwrst);
>>>> }
>>>> --
>>>> 1.7.4.1
>>>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@deeprootsystems.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] perf: Use pre-empt safe cpu_get/put insted of smp_processor_id
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:50:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k3w5jydz.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50499A5C.60006@ti.com> (Roger Quadros's message of "Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:55:24 +0300")
Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> writes:
> Hi Jean,
>
> My bad, I didn't follow up with this. My guess is that it has not been
> picked up. Tony, Kevin?
>
Wasn't picked up by me (but should've been, sorry.) Care to refresh
against v3.6-rc4 and resend?
Thanks,
Kevin
>
> On 09/06/2012 09:59 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
>> Fixed Paul's email address
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@newoldbits.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Roger,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> wrote:
>>>> gets rid of below messages with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT enabled
>>>>
>>>> [ 28.832916] debug_smp_processor_id: 18 callbacks suppressed
>>>> [ 28.832946] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: modprobe/1763
>>>> [ 28.841491] caller is pwrdm_set_next_pwrst+0x54/0x120
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
>>>
>>> What his the status of the patch? Has it been reviewed and taken in an
>>> integration tree? I cannot find anything about it in l-o and
>>> linux-next.
>>>
>>> I have some changes on-going in the OMAP PM code and I would like to
>>> know if $SUBJECT is applicable.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jean
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c | 9 ++++++---
>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 12 ++++++++----
>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c | 6 ++++--
>>>> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
>>>> index ea3f565..06747b6 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
>>>> @@ -285,7 +285,8 @@ void omap2_clk_disable(struct clk *clk)
>>>> pr_debug("clock: %s: disabling in hardware\n", clk->name);
>>>>
>>>> if (clk->ops && clk->ops->disable) {
>>>> - trace_clock_disable(clk->name, 0, smp_processor_id());
>>>> + trace_clock_disable(clk->name, 0, get_cpu());
>>>> + put_cpu();
>>>> clk->ops->disable(clk);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -339,7 +340,8 @@ int omap2_clk_enable(struct clk *clk)
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> if (clk->ops && clk->ops->enable) {
>>>> - trace_clock_enable(clk->name, 1, smp_processor_id());
>>>> + trace_clock_enable(clk->name, 1, get_cpu());
>>>> + put_cpu();
>>>> ret = clk->ops->enable(clk);
>>>> if (ret) {
>>>> WARN(1, "clock: %s: could not enable: %d\n",
>>>> @@ -380,7 +382,8 @@ int omap2_clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
>>>>
>>>> /* dpll_ck, core_ck, virt_prcm_set; plus all clksel clocks */
>>>> if (clk->set_rate) {
>>>> - trace_clock_set_rate(clk->name, rate, smp_processor_id());
>>>> + trace_clock_set_rate(clk->name, rate, get_cpu());
>>>> + put_cpu();
>>>> ret = clk->set_rate(clk, rate);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
>>>> index e4fc88c..81fec2e 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
>>>> @@ -357,18 +357,22 @@ void omap_sram_idle(void)
>>>>
>>>> static void omap3_pm_idle(void)
>>>> {
>>>> + unsigned cpu;
>>>> +
>>>> local_fiq_disable();
>>>>
>>>> if (omap_irq_pending())
>>>> goto out;
>>>>
>>>> - trace_power_start(POWER_CSTATE, 1, smp_processor_id());
>>>> - trace_cpu_idle(1, smp_processor_id());
>>>> + cpu = get_cpu();
>>>> + trace_power_start(POWER_CSTATE, 1, cpu);
>>>> + trace_cpu_idle(1, cpu);
>>>>
>>>> omap_sram_idle();
>>>>
>>>> - trace_power_end(smp_processor_id());
>>>> - trace_cpu_idle(PWR_EVENT_EXIT, smp_processor_id());
>>>> + trace_power_end(cpu);
>>>> + trace_cpu_idle(PWR_EVENT_EXIT, cpu);
>>>> + put_cpu();
>>>>
>>>> out:
>>>> local_fiq_enable();
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c
>>>> index 69b36e1..138bf86 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c
>>>> @@ -169,7 +169,8 @@ static int _pwrdm_state_switch(struct powerdomain *pwrdm, int flag)
>>>> ((state & OMAP_POWERSTATE_MASK) << 8) |
>>>> ((prev & OMAP_POWERSTATE_MASK) << 0));
>>>> trace_power_domain_target(pwrdm->name, trace_state,
>>>> - smp_processor_id());
>>>> + get_cpu());
>>>> + put_cpu();
>>>> }
>>>> break;
>>>> default:
>>>> @@ -491,7 +492,8 @@ int pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(struct powerdomain *pwrdm, u8 pwrst)
>>>> if (arch_pwrdm && arch_pwrdm->pwrdm_set_next_pwrst) {
>>>> /* Trace the pwrdm desired target state */
>>>> trace_power_domain_target(pwrdm->name, pwrst,
>>>> - smp_processor_id());
>>>> + get_cpu());
>>>> + put_cpu();
>>>> /* Program the pwrdm desired target state */
>>>> ret = arch_pwrdm->pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(pwrdm, pwrst);
>>>> }
>>>> --
>>>> 1.7.4.1
>>>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-07 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-10 14:05 [PATCH] perf: Use pre-empt safe cpu_get/put insted of smp_processor_id Roger Quadros
2012-08-10 14:05 ` Roger Quadros
2012-09-06 18:56 ` Jean Pihet
2012-09-06 18:56 ` Jean Pihet
2012-09-06 18:59 ` Jean Pihet
2012-09-06 18:59 ` Jean Pihet
2012-09-07 6:55 ` Roger Quadros
2012-09-07 6:55 ` Roger Quadros
2012-09-07 21:50 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-09-07 21:50 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k3w5jydz.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
--to=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=rogerq@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.